The learning curve for lumbar discectomy in unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery using the cumulative summation method.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Takaki Yoshimizu, Sanshiro Saito, Teruaki Miyake, Tetsutaro Mizuno, Ushio Nosaka, Keisuke Ishii, Mizuki Watanabe, Kanji Sasaki
{"title":"The learning curve for lumbar discectomy in unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery using the cumulative summation method.","authors":"Takaki Yoshimizu, Sanshiro Saito, Teruaki Miyake, Tetsutaro Mizuno, Ushio Nosaka, Keisuke Ishii, Mizuki Watanabe, Kanji Sasaki","doi":"10.1186/s13018-025-05763-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is gaining popularity owing to its versatility as a spinal endoscopic procedure. However, the general value of the learning curve for discectomy by UBE is unknown. This retrospective study aimed to determine the learning curve of UBE for lumbar discectomy using a cumulative summation (CUSUM) method. We examined the learning curves of four surgeons at an institution and factors that shortened the learning curves.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 200 patients (mean age 44.2 years) who underwent lumbar discectomy by UBE at our hospital and four male orthopedic surgeons who had performed 50 UBE discectomies. An approximate curve using the CUSUM method was created using the mean operative time for each case as the target. All surgeons had performed lumbar discectomy and over 200 spinal surgeries before inducing UBE. Surgeon A received specialized training in shoulder arthroscopic surgery. The surgical times before and after the curve reached its maximum value were compared; a point of significant difference was defined as case to proficiency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean operative times for surgeons A, B, C, and D were 48, 66, 90, and 87 min, respectively. The approximate curves obtained using the CUSUM method had maxima at x = 22, 20, 27, and 13. The operating times of Surgeons A and B showed significant differences before and after the maxima (59 vs. 39 and 75 vs. 60), whereas those of Surgeons C and D did not (96 vs. 84 and 95 vs. 85).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>UBE is generally considered to have a steep learning curve; in this study, the learning curve differed depending on the surgeon. The surgeon with the best learning curve was trained as an arthroscopic surgeon. Coordination for endoscopic surgery influenced the learning curve compared to the experience with spine surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":16629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","volume":"20 1","pages":"335"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11963341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-025-05763-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) is gaining popularity owing to its versatility as a spinal endoscopic procedure. However, the general value of the learning curve for discectomy by UBE is unknown. This retrospective study aimed to determine the learning curve of UBE for lumbar discectomy using a cumulative summation (CUSUM) method. We examined the learning curves of four surgeons at an institution and factors that shortened the learning curves.

Methods: The study included 200 patients (mean age 44.2 years) who underwent lumbar discectomy by UBE at our hospital and four male orthopedic surgeons who had performed 50 UBE discectomies. An approximate curve using the CUSUM method was created using the mean operative time for each case as the target. All surgeons had performed lumbar discectomy and over 200 spinal surgeries before inducing UBE. Surgeon A received specialized training in shoulder arthroscopic surgery. The surgical times before and after the curve reached its maximum value were compared; a point of significant difference was defined as case to proficiency.

Results: The mean operative times for surgeons A, B, C, and D were 48, 66, 90, and 87 min, respectively. The approximate curves obtained using the CUSUM method had maxima at x = 22, 20, 27, and 13. The operating times of Surgeons A and B showed significant differences before and after the maxima (59 vs. 39 and 75 vs. 60), whereas those of Surgeons C and D did not (96 vs. 84 and 95 vs. 85).

Conclusions: UBE is generally considered to have a steep learning curve; in this study, the learning curve differed depending on the surgeon. The surgeon with the best learning curve was trained as an arthroscopic surgeon. Coordination for endoscopic surgery influenced the learning curve compared to the experience with spine surgery.

单侧双侧内窥镜脊柱手术中腰椎间盘切除术的学习曲线,采用累积求和法。
背景:单侧双门静脉内窥镜(UBE)由于其作为脊柱内窥镜手术的多功能性而越来越受欢迎。然而,UBE椎间盘切除术的学习曲线的一般价值尚不清楚。本回顾性研究旨在利用累积求和(CUSUM)方法确定UBE用于腰椎间盘切除术的学习曲线。我们研究了一家机构的四位外科医生的学习曲线以及缩短学习曲线的因素。方法:本研究纳入200例在我院行UBE腰椎间盘切除术的患者(平均年龄44.2岁)和4名实施50例UBE手术的男性骨科医生。采用CUSUM方法,以每个病例的平均手术时间为目标,绘制近似曲线。所有外科医生在诱发UBE前都进行了腰椎间盘切除术和200多例脊柱手术。外科医生A接受过肩关节镜手术的专门训练。比较曲线达到最大值前后的手术次数;一个显著差异点被定义为从案例到熟练程度。结果:A、B、C、D术者的平均手术时间分别为48、66、90、87 min。使用CUSUM方法得到的近似曲线在x = 22、20、27和13处有最大值。A、B外科医生的手术时间在最大值前后有显著差异(59 vs. 39, 75 vs. 60),而C、D外科医生的手术时间无显著差异(96 vs. 84, 95 vs. 85)。结论:UBE通常被认为具有陡峭的学习曲线;在这项研究中,学习曲线因外科医生而异。学习曲线最好的外科医生被训练成关节镜外科医生。与脊柱外科经验相比,内窥镜手术的协调性影响了学习曲线。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
494
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of clinical and basic research studies related to musculoskeletal issues. Orthopaedic research is conducted at clinical and basic science levels. With the advancement of new technologies and the increasing expectation and demand from doctors and patients, we are witnessing an enormous growth in clinical orthopaedic research, particularly in the fields of traumatology, spinal surgery, joint replacement, sports medicine, musculoskeletal tumour management, hand microsurgery, foot and ankle surgery, paediatric orthopaedic, and orthopaedic rehabilitation. The involvement of basic science ranges from molecular, cellular, structural and functional perspectives to tissue engineering, gait analysis, automation and robotic surgery. Implant and biomaterial designs are new disciplines that complement clinical applications. JOSR encourages the publication of multidisciplinary research with collaboration amongst clinicians and scientists from different disciplines, which will be the trend in the coming decades.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信