The role of power and kinetic asymmetry in differentiating elite vs. sub-elite wheelchair rugby sprint performance.

IF 2.3 2区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Thomas J O'Brien, Simon J Briley, Conor Murphy, Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey
{"title":"The role of power and kinetic asymmetry in differentiating elite vs. sub-elite wheelchair rugby sprint performance.","authors":"Thomas J O'Brien, Simon J Briley, Conor Murphy, Victoria L Goosey-Tolfrey","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2481346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wheelchair sprint performance varies by sports classification. Yet, it is unclear how spatio-temporal, kinetic and kinetic asymmetries of wheelchair sprinting differ among wheelchair rugby players of different performance standard. The study purpose was to examine the associations between 30s sprint performances and spatio-temporal, kinetic and kinetic asymmetries on a dual-roller ergometer in elite and sub-elite wheelchair rugby players (<i>n</i> = 20). Kinetic differences between groups were investigated using statistical parametric mapping. Peak velocities were associated with the acceleration phase and higher peak power (<i>r</i> = 0.62, <i>p</i> = 0.003) and lower push times (<i>r</i>=-0.50, <i>p</i> = 0.020). Greater distance travelled during the acceleration phase were correlated with lower asymmetries in peak power (<i>r</i>=-0.58, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Overall, both peak velocity and total distance covered during the entire sprint was correlated with lower push times (<i>r</i>=-0.61, <i>p</i> = 0.003 and <i>r</i>=-0.62, <i>p</i> = 0.003) but greater peak power (<i>r</i>=-0.61, <i>p</i> = 0.003 and <i>r</i>=-0.62, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Elite players had lower power asymmetries between 1 to 15% and 95 to 100% of the push phase during the acceleration phase, accompanied by a lower initial contact asymmetry (<i>p</i> = 0.011). While power is an essential feature of sprinting, our findings show that how it is applied, in terms of asymmetry and coordination might differentiate the performance in wheelchair rugby.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2481346","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wheelchair sprint performance varies by sports classification. Yet, it is unclear how spatio-temporal, kinetic and kinetic asymmetries of wheelchair sprinting differ among wheelchair rugby players of different performance standard. The study purpose was to examine the associations between 30s sprint performances and spatio-temporal, kinetic and kinetic asymmetries on a dual-roller ergometer in elite and sub-elite wheelchair rugby players (n = 20). Kinetic differences between groups were investigated using statistical parametric mapping. Peak velocities were associated with the acceleration phase and higher peak power (r = 0.62, p = 0.003) and lower push times (r=-0.50, p = 0.020). Greater distance travelled during the acceleration phase were correlated with lower asymmetries in peak power (r=-0.58, p = 0.005). Overall, both peak velocity and total distance covered during the entire sprint was correlated with lower push times (r=-0.61, p = 0.003 and r=-0.62, p = 0.003) but greater peak power (r=-0.61, p = 0.003 and r=-0.62, p = 0.003). Elite players had lower power asymmetries between 1 to 15% and 95 to 100% of the push phase during the acceleration phase, accompanied by a lower initial contact asymmetry (p = 0.011). While power is an essential feature of sprinting, our findings show that how it is applied, in terms of asymmetry and coordination might differentiate the performance in wheelchair rugby.

力量和运动不对称在区分精英和次精英轮椅橄榄球短跑成绩中的作用。
轮椅冲刺的表现因运动类别而异。然而,不同成绩标准的轮椅橄榄球运动员在轮椅短跑的时空、运动和运动不对称性方面的差异尚不清楚。采用双滚轴测力仪对20名优秀和次优秀轮椅橄榄球运动员30岁短跑成绩与时空、运动和运动不对称之间的关系进行了研究。使用统计参数映射来研究组间的动力学差异。峰值速度与加速阶段、更高的峰值功率(r= 0.62, p = 0.003)和更低的推动次数(r=-0.50, p = 0.020)相关。在加速阶段行驶的距离越大,峰值功率的不对称性越低(r=-0.58, p = 0.005)。总的来说,在整个冲刺过程中,峰值速度和总距离与较低的推动次数(r=-0.61, p = 0.003和r=-0.62, p = 0.003)和较大的峰值功率(r=-0.61, p = 0.003和r=-0.62, p = 0.003)相关。在加速阶段,精英选手的力量不对称在1 - 15%和95 - 100%之间,伴随着较低的初始接触不对称(p = 0.011)。虽然力量是短跑的基本特征,但我们的研究结果表明,在不对称和协调方面,力量的运用方式可能会使轮椅橄榄球的表现有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Sports Sciences
Journal of Sports Sciences 社会科学-运动科学
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
147
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives. The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信