The safety and efficacy of BCG combined with mitomycin C compared with BCG monotherapy in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Open Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-26 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1515/med-2024-1134
Jianping Liu, Weijian Zhou, Wei Zhang, Congwang Chang, Peng Zhang, Guanghua Fu
{"title":"The safety and efficacy of BCG combined with mitomycin C compared with BCG monotherapy in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jianping Liu, Weijian Zhou, Wei Zhang, Congwang Chang, Peng Zhang, Guanghua Fu","doi":"10.1515/med-2024-1134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) combined with mitomycin C (MMC) compared with BCG monotherapy in intravesical therapies for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We followed the recommended PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. Systematic literatures were performed on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, VIP, Wan Fang, and Clinical Trials.gov. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BCG combined with MMC and BCG monotherapy in intravesical therapies for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients were searched until August 1, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This meta-analysis included 11 RCTs with a total of 1,349 subjects. Compared with BCG monotherapy, BCG combined with MMC was associated with lower disease recurrence rate (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.77, <i>P</i> < 0.00001), disease progression rate (RR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.44-0.84, <i>P</i> = 0.003), and disease-specific mortality (RR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26-0.78, <i>P</i> = 0.004). However, there was a higher incidence of systemic adverse reactions (RR 1.57, 95% CI: 1.22-2.02, <i>P</i> = 0.0004). There was no significant difference in the incidence of local adverse reactions (RR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.95-1.20, <i>P</i> = 0.26) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.62-1.03, <i>P</i> = 0.08) between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>BCG combined with MMC was associated with a decreased risk of bladder cancer recurrence and disease progression compared with BCG monotherapy. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of local adverse events and all-cause mortality between the two groups. Due to the limitations of the number and quality of the included studies, more high-quality RCTs are needed to further explore the efficacy and safety of combined therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19715,"journal":{"name":"Open Medicine","volume":"20 1","pages":"20241134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11964182/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/med-2024-1134","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We sought to determine the efficacy and safety of Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) combined with mitomycin C (MMC) compared with BCG monotherapy in intravesical therapies for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC).

Methods: We followed the recommended PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. Systematic literatures were performed on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CNKI, CBM, VIP, Wan Fang, and Clinical Trials.gov. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BCG combined with MMC and BCG monotherapy in intravesical therapies for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients were searched until August 1, 2023.

Results: This meta-analysis included 11 RCTs with a total of 1,349 subjects. Compared with BCG monotherapy, BCG combined with MMC was associated with lower disease recurrence rate (relative risk [RR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.77, P < 0.00001), disease progression rate (RR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.44-0.84, P = 0.003), and disease-specific mortality (RR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26-0.78, P = 0.004). However, there was a higher incidence of systemic adverse reactions (RR 1.57, 95% CI: 1.22-2.02, P = 0.0004). There was no significant difference in the incidence of local adverse reactions (RR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.95-1.20, P = 0.26) and all-cause mortality (RR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.62-1.03, P = 0.08) between the two groups.

Conclusions: BCG combined with MMC was associated with a decreased risk of bladder cancer recurrence and disease progression compared with BCG monotherapy. However, there was no significant difference in the incidence of local adverse events and all-cause mortality between the two groups. Due to the limitations of the number and quality of the included studies, more high-quality RCTs are needed to further explore the efficacy and safety of combined therapies.

卡介苗联合丝裂霉素C与卡介苗单药治疗非肌浸润性膀胱癌的安全性和有效性比较:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
前言:我们试图确定卡介苗联合丝裂霉素C (MMC)与卡介苗单药在膀胱内治疗非肌肉侵袭性膀胱癌(NMIBC)中的疗效和安全性。方法:我们遵循PRISMA推荐的指南进行系统评价。在PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、CNKI、CBM、VIP、万方和Clinical Trials.gov上进行系统文献检索。截至2023年8月1日,研究人员检索了比较卡介苗联合MMC和卡介苗单药治疗膀胱内治疗非肌肉侵袭性膀胱癌患者的随机对照试验(RCTs)。结果:本荟萃分析包括11项随机对照试验,共1,349名受试者。与卡介苗单药治疗相比,卡介苗联合MMC的疾病复发率(相对危险度[RR] 0.66, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.56 ~ 0.77, P < 0.00001)、疾病进展率(RR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.44 ~ 0.84, P = 0.003)和疾病特异性死亡率(RR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.26 ~ 0.78, P = 0.004)较低。然而,全身性不良反应发生率较高(RR 1.57, 95% CI: 1.22-2.02, P = 0.0004)。两组局部不良反应发生率(RR 1.07, 95% CI: 0.95 ~ 1.20, P = 0.26)和全因死亡率(RR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.62 ~ 1.03, P = 0.08)差异无统计学意义。结论:与卡介苗单药治疗相比,卡介苗联合MMC可降低膀胱癌复发和疾病进展的风险。然而,两组之间的局部不良事件发生率和全因死亡率没有显著差异。由于纳入研究数量和质量的限制,需要更多高质量的rct来进一步探讨联合治疗的疗效和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Medicine
Open Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Medicine is an open access journal that provides users with free, instant, and continued access to all content worldwide. The primary goal of the journal has always been a focus on maintaining the high quality of its published content. Its mission is to facilitate the exchange of ideas between medical science researchers from different countries. Papers connected to all fields of medicine and public health are welcomed. Open Medicine accepts submissions of research articles, reviews, case reports, letters to editor and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信