{"title":"The validity and reliability of the 10-meter walk test with obstacles in community-dwelling older adults.","authors":"Birol Önal, Ayşe Abit Kocaman","doi":"10.1097/MRR.0000000000000665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the 10-meter walk test modified by adding 5 and 17 cm obstacles (10MWT-O) in community-dwelling older adults and to examine its ability to differentiate between older and younger adults. The study included 65 older adults and 55 younger adults. 10MWT-O (obstacle height: 0, 5, 17 cm) was performed on two different days (day 1 and day 2). All participants were assessed by the same assessor on days 1 and 2. Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Time Up and Go (TUG) test, Mini Mental State Test, and Functional Reach Test (FRT) assessments were performed on day 1. 10MWT-O speed for all obstacle heights showed moderate to good correlations with FRT distance (r = 0.474-0.539, P < 0.001), TUG Test time (r = -0.722 to -0.671, P < 0.001), and BBS score (r = 0.619-0.660, P < 0.001). Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.924-0.960) was found to be within the excellent range for 10MWT-O speed across all obstacle heights. For obstacle heights of 0, 5, and 17 cm, the minimum detectable change for 10MWT-O speed was 0.16, 0.19, and 0.20 m/s, and the optimal cutoff values for differentiating older from young adults were 1.12, 0.98, and 0.85 m/s, respectively. The 10MWT-O is a reliable and valid clinical measure for assessing walking ability and adaptability in older adults. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06307769.</p>","PeriodicalId":14301,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rehabilitation Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0000000000000665","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the 10-meter walk test modified by adding 5 and 17 cm obstacles (10MWT-O) in community-dwelling older adults and to examine its ability to differentiate between older and younger adults. The study included 65 older adults and 55 younger adults. 10MWT-O (obstacle height: 0, 5, 17 cm) was performed on two different days (day 1 and day 2). All participants were assessed by the same assessor on days 1 and 2. Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Time Up and Go (TUG) test, Mini Mental State Test, and Functional Reach Test (FRT) assessments were performed on day 1. 10MWT-O speed for all obstacle heights showed moderate to good correlations with FRT distance (r = 0.474-0.539, P < 0.001), TUG Test time (r = -0.722 to -0.671, P < 0.001), and BBS score (r = 0.619-0.660, P < 0.001). Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.924-0.960) was found to be within the excellent range for 10MWT-O speed across all obstacle heights. For obstacle heights of 0, 5, and 17 cm, the minimum detectable change for 10MWT-O speed was 0.16, 0.19, and 0.20 m/s, and the optimal cutoff values for differentiating older from young adults were 1.12, 0.98, and 0.85 m/s, respectively. The 10MWT-O is a reliable and valid clinical measure for assessing walking ability and adaptability in older adults. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06307769.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Rehabilitation Research is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary forum for the publication of research into functioning, disability and contextual factors experienced by persons of all ages in both developed and developing societies. The wealth of information offered makes the journal a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and administrators in such fields as rehabilitation medicine, outcome measurement nursing, social and vocational rehabilitation/case management, return to work, special education, social policy, social work and social welfare, sociology, psychology, psychiatry assistive technology and environmental factors/disability. Areas of interest include functioning and disablement throughout the life cycle; rehabilitation programmes for persons with physical, sensory, mental and developmental disabilities; measurement of functioning and disability; special education and vocational rehabilitation; equipment access and transportation; information technology; independent living; consumer, legal, economic and sociopolitical aspects of functioning, disability and contextual factors.