Early identification of functional high-risk multiple myeloma patients after transplant: the predictive power of fat fraction and Response Assessment Category score in diffusion-weighted whole-body magnetic resonance imaging.
Angelo Belotti, Barbara Frittoli, Sofia Terlizzi, Rossella Ribolla, Claudia Crippa, Chiara Saeli, Samantha Ferrari, Nicola Bianchetti, Chiara Bottelli, Chiara Cattaneo, Carmela Carbone, Alessandro Gullino, Marco Chiarini, Viviana Giustini, Aldo Roccaro, Luigi Grazioli, Alessandra Tucci
{"title":"Early identification of functional high-risk multiple myeloma patients after transplant: the predictive power of fat fraction and Response Assessment Category score in diffusion-weighted whole-body magnetic resonance imaging.","authors":"Angelo Belotti, Barbara Frittoli, Sofia Terlizzi, Rossella Ribolla, Claudia Crippa, Chiara Saeli, Samantha Ferrari, Nicola Bianchetti, Chiara Bottelli, Chiara Cattaneo, Carmela Carbone, Alessandro Gullino, Marco Chiarini, Viviana Giustini, Aldo Roccaro, Luigi Grazioli, Alessandra Tucci","doi":"10.3324/haematol.2025.287409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Functional high-risk (FHR) multiple myeloma (MM) patients, defined as those with early relapse despite optimal initial therapy, represent an unmet clinical need. Diffusion-weighted whole-body MRI (DW-MRI) is increasingly used in MM management due to its high sensitivity in assessing treatment response. The Myeloma Response Assessment and Diagnosis System (MYRADS) established the Response Assessment Category (RAC), a 5-point scale ranging from complete response (RAC 1) to progressive disease (RAC 5), which independently stratifies patients with different outcomes after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The relative fat fraction (rFF), derived from DW-MRI, provides additional prognostic insights into bone marrow composition. This study aimed to evaluate whether the combined assessment of RAC and rFF could identify FHR MM patients at risk of early relapse, defined as progression within 18 months post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Ninety-seven MM patients were retrospectively analyzed after ASCT, before maintenance, with a median follow-up of 47 months. An rFF threshold of 17.2% predicted early relapse with 83% sensitivity and 85% specificity. Patients with rFF >17.2% had significantly improved post-ASCT progression-free survival (PFS, median not reached [NR] vs. 13.7 months, HR 0.18; 95% CI: 0.08-0.43) and overall survival (OS, 3-year rate: 96% vs. 62%, HR 0.12; 95% CI: 0.03-0.45) compared to rFF ≤17.2%. Patients with RAC 1/rFF High had the best outcomes, while RAC ≥2/rFF Low had the worst prognosis (median PFS: NR vs. 12.3 months, HR 0.21; 95% CI: 0.07-0.62). rFF complements RAC for response assessment after ASCT, enabling early identification of FHR patients with poor prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12964,"journal":{"name":"Haematologica","volume":" ","pages":"2151-2159"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12399935/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haematologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2025.287409","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Functional high-risk (FHR) multiple myeloma (MM) patients, defined as those with early relapse despite optimal initial therapy, represent an unmet clinical need. Diffusion-weighted whole-body MRI (DW-MRI) is increasingly used in MM management due to its high sensitivity in assessing treatment response. The Myeloma Response Assessment and Diagnosis System (MYRADS) established the Response Assessment Category (RAC), a 5-point scale ranging from complete response (RAC 1) to progressive disease (RAC 5), which independently stratifies patients with different outcomes after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The relative fat fraction (rFF), derived from DW-MRI, provides additional prognostic insights into bone marrow composition. This study aimed to evaluate whether the combined assessment of RAC and rFF could identify FHR MM patients at risk of early relapse, defined as progression within 18 months post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Ninety-seven MM patients were retrospectively analyzed after ASCT, before maintenance, with a median follow-up of 47 months. An rFF threshold of 17.2% predicted early relapse with 83% sensitivity and 85% specificity. Patients with rFF >17.2% had significantly improved post-ASCT progression-free survival (PFS, median not reached [NR] vs. 13.7 months, HR 0.18; 95% CI: 0.08-0.43) and overall survival (OS, 3-year rate: 96% vs. 62%, HR 0.12; 95% CI: 0.03-0.45) compared to rFF ≤17.2%. Patients with RAC 1/rFF High had the best outcomes, while RAC ≥2/rFF Low had the worst prognosis (median PFS: NR vs. 12.3 months, HR 0.21; 95% CI: 0.07-0.62). rFF complements RAC for response assessment after ASCT, enabling early identification of FHR patients with poor prognosis.
功能性高风险(FHR)多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者,定义为尽管初始治疗最佳,但早期复发的患者,代表了未满足的临床需求。扩散加权全身MRI (DW-MRI)因其在评估治疗反应方面的高灵敏度而越来越多地用于MM管理。骨髓瘤反应评估和诊断系统(MY-RADS)建立了反应评估分类(RAC),这是一个从完全缓解(RAC 1)到进展性疾病(RAC 5)的5分制,它独立地对自体干细胞移植(ASCT)后不同结局的患者进行分层。来自DW-MRI的相对脂肪分数(rFF)为骨髓组成提供了额外的预后见解。本研究旨在评估RAC和rFF联合评估是否可以识别有早期复发风险的FHR MM患者,早期复发定义为asct后18个月内的进展。回顾性分析97例MM患者ASCT后,维持前,中位随访时间为47个月。rFF阈值为17.2%预测早期复发,敏感性为83%,特异性为85%。rFF患者的无进展生存期(PFS,中位未达到vs. 13.7个月,HR 0.18;95% CI 0.08-0.43)和总生存率(OS, 3年生存率:96% vs. 62%, HR 0.12;95% CI 0.03-0.45),而rFF≤17.2%。RAC 1/rFF高的患者预后最好,而RAC≥2/rFF低的患者预后最差(中位PFS: NR vs. 12.3个月,HR 0.21;95% ci 0.07-0.62)。rFF补充RAC用于ASCT后的疗效评估,能够早期识别预后不良的FHR患者。
期刊介绍:
Haematologica is a journal that publishes articles within the broad field of hematology. It reports on novel findings in basic, clinical, and translational research.
Scope:
The scope of the journal includes reporting novel research results that:
Have a significant impact on understanding normal hematology or the development of hematological diseases.
Are likely to bring important changes to the diagnosis or treatment of hematological diseases.