Comparison of Event-based Analysis Versus Trend-based Analysis in the Detection of Glaucoma Progression by Optical Coherence Tomography 3-Dimensional Rim Measurements.
Tamara D Scott, Maria A Guzman Aparicio, Kitiya Ratanawongphaibul, Hang Lee, Michele Zemplenyi, Edem Tsikata, Milica A Margeta, Courtney L Ondeck, Anne L Coleman, Fei Yu, Johannes F de Boer, Teresa C Chen
{"title":"Comparison of Event-based Analysis Versus Trend-based Analysis in the Detection of Glaucoma Progression by Optical Coherence Tomography 3-Dimensional Rim Measurements.","authors":"Tamara D Scott, Maria A Guzman Aparicio, Kitiya Ratanawongphaibul, Hang Lee, Michele Zemplenyi, Edem Tsikata, Milica A Margeta, Courtney L Ondeck, Anne L Coleman, Fei Yu, Johannes F de Boer, Teresa C Chen","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>Compared with trend-based analysis, event-based analysis detects OCT structural progression in more patients and at an earlier time point. Using event-based analysis, MDB rim thickness detects progression more often than RNFL thickness.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether event-based or trend-based analysis best detects glaucoma progression using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and minimum distance band (MDB) neuroretinal rim measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Over 5 years, 124 open angle glaucoma patients had yearly dilated eye examinations, disc photography, Humphrey visual field (HVF 24-2) testing, 2-dimensional (2D) OCT RNFL thickness measurements, and 3-dimensional (3D) OCT MDB rim measurements, all on the same day. One eye of each patient was analyzed, which was randomly selected if both eyes from a patient were eligible. Using global RNFL thickness and global MDB rim thickness, event-based progression was defined as change greater than normal aging change and expected inter-test variability. Trend-based analysis used linear regression with progression defined as rate of decline greater than age-related decline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average follow-up for the 124 open angle glaucoma patients was 66.9±16.4 months. Event-based analysis was better than trend-based analysis because it detected progression in more patients (15.3% by RNFL event-based analysis versus 8.1% by RNFL trend-based analysis, P =0.025; 52.4% by MDB event-based analysis versus 9.7% by MDB trend-based analysis, P <0.001) and earlier (RNFL: mean 28.8 vs. 63.2 mo; P <0.001; MDB: mean 30.7 vs. 56.2 mo; P <0.003) whether using MDB rim thickness or RNFL thickness. Using event-based analysis, MDB rim thickness detected progression more often than RNFL thickness (52.4% vs. 15.3%; P <0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with trend-based analysis, event-based analysis detected OCT structural progression in more glaucoma patients and at an earlier time point.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":"616-624"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12323761/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002573","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Prcis: Compared with trend-based analysis, event-based analysis detects OCT structural progression in more patients and at an earlier time point. Using event-based analysis, MDB rim thickness detects progression more often than RNFL thickness.
Purpose: To determine whether event-based or trend-based analysis best detects glaucoma progression using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness and minimum distance band (MDB) neuroretinal rim measurements.
Methods: Over 5 years, 124 open angle glaucoma patients had yearly dilated eye examinations, disc photography, Humphrey visual field (HVF 24-2) testing, 2-dimensional (2D) OCT RNFL thickness measurements, and 3-dimensional (3D) OCT MDB rim measurements, all on the same day. One eye of each patient was analyzed, which was randomly selected if both eyes from a patient were eligible. Using global RNFL thickness and global MDB rim thickness, event-based progression was defined as change greater than normal aging change and expected inter-test variability. Trend-based analysis used linear regression with progression defined as rate of decline greater than age-related decline.
Results: The average follow-up for the 124 open angle glaucoma patients was 66.9±16.4 months. Event-based analysis was better than trend-based analysis because it detected progression in more patients (15.3% by RNFL event-based analysis versus 8.1% by RNFL trend-based analysis, P =0.025; 52.4% by MDB event-based analysis versus 9.7% by MDB trend-based analysis, P <0.001) and earlier (RNFL: mean 28.8 vs. 63.2 mo; P <0.001; MDB: mean 30.7 vs. 56.2 mo; P <0.003) whether using MDB rim thickness or RNFL thickness. Using event-based analysis, MDB rim thickness detected progression more often than RNFL thickness (52.4% vs. 15.3%; P <0.001).
Conclusions: Compared with trend-based analysis, event-based analysis detected OCT structural progression in more glaucoma patients and at an earlier time point.
与基于趋势的分析相比,基于事件的分析在更多的患者和更早的时间点检测到OCT结构进展。使用基于事件的分析,MDB边缘厚度比RNFL厚度更容易检测到进展。目的:通过光谱域光学相干断层扫描(OCT)、视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)厚度和最小距离带(MDB)神经视网膜边缘测量,确定基于事件或基于趋势的分析是否能最好地检测青光眼的进展。方法:124例开角型青光眼患者在5年多的时间里,每年进行一次扩眼检查,椎间盘摄影,Humphrey视野(HVF 24-2)测试,二维(2D) OCT RNFL厚度测量,三维(3D) OCT MDB边缘测量,所有这些都在同一天进行。分析每位患者的一只眼睛,如果患者的两只眼睛都符合条件,则随机选择。使用全局RNFL厚度和全局MDB边缘厚度,基于事件的进展被定义为大于正常老化变化和预期测试间变异性的变化。基于趋势的分析使用线性回归,将递进定义为递进率大于年龄相关的递进率。结果:124例开角型青光眼患者平均随访66.9±16.4个月。基于事件的分析优于基于趋势的分析,因为它检测到更多患者的进展(基于RNFL事件的分析为15.3%,而基于RNFL趋势的分析为8.1%,P=0.025;结论:与基于趋势的分析相比,基于事件的分析在更多的青光眼患者中检测到OCT结构进展,并且在更早的时间点。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.