5-5-5 ABRT (Dose of 5 Gy per Fraction for up to 5 Fractions Over 5 Weeks Adaptive Bridging Radiation Therapy)-Artificial Intelligence Enters the CAR (-T) (Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T) in Relapsed/Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma.
Hazim S Ababneh, Andrea K Ng, Joshua Wan, Tyler Walburn, Lin Zhu, Mislav Bobić, Patrick Connor Johnson, Jeremy Bredtfeld, Jonathan Leeman, Jacob Soumerai, Jeremy S Abramson, Jeffrey Barnes, Ronald Takvorian, Matthew J Frigault, Jennifer Pursley, Chirayu G Patel
{"title":"5-5-5 ABRT (Dose of 5 Gy per Fraction for up to 5 Fractions Over 5 Weeks Adaptive Bridging Radiation Therapy)-Artificial Intelligence Enters the CAR (-T) (Chimeric Antigen Receptor-T) in Relapsed/Refractory Large B Cell Lymphoma.","authors":"Hazim S Ababneh, Andrea K Ng, Joshua Wan, Tyler Walburn, Lin Zhu, Mislav Bobić, Patrick Connor Johnson, Jeremy Bredtfeld, Jonathan Leeman, Jacob Soumerai, Jeremy S Abramson, Jeffrey Barnes, Ronald Takvorian, Matthew J Frigault, Jennifer Pursley, Chirayu G Patel","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Bridging radiation therapy (BRT) is effective for local control in patients with relapsed or refractory large B cell lymphoma who are undergoing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. We hypothesized that adaptive BRT (ABRT), which can be used to personalize the radiation dose, fractionation, and volume based on real-time lymphoma target volume, is feasible, safe, and effective for local control.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>We conducted a pilot study to investigate, once weekly, computed tomography-based adaptive radiation therapy (Varian Ethos) at a dose of 5 Gy per fraction for up to 5 fractions over 5 weeks in patients referred for BRT (NCT06004167).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients were enrolled. Eleven sites were irradiated for palliative purposes, achieving an overall symptomatic response rate of 100%. Of the 40 total ABRT sessions, 26 fractions were delivered (65%). For 8 of the 11 target volumes treated, ABRT was held after the first 1 or 2 fractions. The in-field responses during ABRT pre-CAR T were: complete response (n = 3, 30%), partial response (n = 6, 60%), and in-field progression (n = 1, 10%). After CAR T cell infusion, the best overall response rate was 70% (n = 7), all of whom achieved complete response. Among all 10 patients, 3 experienced in-field recurrence after start date of BRT. Among those with immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (n = 6), grade 3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 50% (n = 3). No grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome events were reported. At the time of the last follow-up, 9 patients (90%) were still alive, and 1 patient (10%) died due to disease progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrate the safety and feasibility of ABRT at a dose of 5 Gy per fraction for up to 5 fractions over 5 weeks in this highly relapsed/refractory population, even in patients with high-volume disease, with the vast majority responding to 1 to 2 fractions of 5 Gy. All patients achieved symptomatic relief and were able to proceed to CAR T cell infusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Bridging radiation therapy (BRT) is effective for local control in patients with relapsed or refractory large B cell lymphoma who are undergoing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy. We hypothesized that adaptive BRT (ABRT), which can be used to personalize the radiation dose, fractionation, and volume based on real-time lymphoma target volume, is feasible, safe, and effective for local control.
Methods and materials: We conducted a pilot study to investigate, once weekly, computed tomography-based adaptive radiation therapy (Varian Ethos) at a dose of 5 Gy per fraction for up to 5 fractions over 5 weeks in patients referred for BRT (NCT06004167).
Results: Ten patients were enrolled. Eleven sites were irradiated for palliative purposes, achieving an overall symptomatic response rate of 100%. Of the 40 total ABRT sessions, 26 fractions were delivered (65%). For 8 of the 11 target volumes treated, ABRT was held after the first 1 or 2 fractions. The in-field responses during ABRT pre-CAR T were: complete response (n = 3, 30%), partial response (n = 6, 60%), and in-field progression (n = 1, 10%). After CAR T cell infusion, the best overall response rate was 70% (n = 7), all of whom achieved complete response. Among all 10 patients, 3 experienced in-field recurrence after start date of BRT. Among those with immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (n = 6), grade 3 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome occurred in 50% (n = 3). No grade 3 or higher cytokine release syndrome events were reported. At the time of the last follow-up, 9 patients (90%) were still alive, and 1 patient (10%) died due to disease progression.
Conclusions: We demonstrate the safety and feasibility of ABRT at a dose of 5 Gy per fraction for up to 5 fractions over 5 weeks in this highly relapsed/refractory population, even in patients with high-volume disease, with the vast majority responding to 1 to 2 fractions of 5 Gy. All patients achieved symptomatic relief and were able to proceed to CAR T cell infusion.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.