{"title":"Effects of different energy and protein levels on growth performance, carcass traits, and meat quality of Pekin ducks.","authors":"P Y Zhao, X Ao, W Zhao, L Zhou","doi":"10.3389/fvets.2025.1438526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study was conducted to determine the effects of different energy and protein levels on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, and taste scores of Pekin ducks. A total of 1,800 numbers of 15-day-old ducks (10 replicate pens, 60 birds/pen, 819 ± 18 g/duck) were blocked based on body weight (BW) and randomly allotted to three treatments with different metabolizable energy (ME) and crude protein (CP) levels in this 28-day experiment. Dietary treatments were as follows: (1) low energy protein (LEP), 3,150 kcal/kg and 16% for the grower diet and 3,250 kcal/kg and 15% for the finisher diet; (2) medium energy protein (MEP), 3,250 kcal/kg and 16.5% for the grower diet and 3,350 kcal/kg and 15.5% for the finisher diet; (3) high energy protein (HEP), 3,350 kcal/kg and 17% for the grower diet and 3,450 kcal/kg and 16% for the finisher diet. During days 15-28, body weight gain (BWG) in the LEP group was higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas FI, F/G, and caloric conversion were lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) in the MEP and HEP groups. During days 29-42, birds fed with LEP and HEP diets had lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) BWG but higher F/G and caloric conversion compared with those fed with the MEP diet. Birds fed with the LEP diet had higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) BWG than those fed with MEP and HEP diets throughout the experiment. The abdominal fat yield in the LEP group was lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than in the HEP group. Birds fed with the LEP diet had higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) left breast meat yields than those fed with MEP and HEP diets. The roasting loss in the LEP and HEP groups was lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05) than in the MEP group. Birds fed with LEP and HEP diets had higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) comprehensive scores, flavor scores, scent scores, and taste scores, but lower color scores compared with those fed with the MEP diet. In summary, the LEP diet with the lowest cost may be the most appropriate based on growth performance, roasting loss, and taste scores.</p>","PeriodicalId":12772,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","volume":"12 ","pages":"1438526"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11961882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Veterinary Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1438526","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study was conducted to determine the effects of different energy and protein levels on growth performance, carcass traits, meat quality, and taste scores of Pekin ducks. A total of 1,800 numbers of 15-day-old ducks (10 replicate pens, 60 birds/pen, 819 ± 18 g/duck) were blocked based on body weight (BW) and randomly allotted to three treatments with different metabolizable energy (ME) and crude protein (CP) levels in this 28-day experiment. Dietary treatments were as follows: (1) low energy protein (LEP), 3,150 kcal/kg and 16% for the grower diet and 3,250 kcal/kg and 15% for the finisher diet; (2) medium energy protein (MEP), 3,250 kcal/kg and 16.5% for the grower diet and 3,350 kcal/kg and 15.5% for the finisher diet; (3) high energy protein (HEP), 3,350 kcal/kg and 17% for the grower diet and 3,450 kcal/kg and 16% for the finisher diet. During days 15-28, body weight gain (BWG) in the LEP group was higher (p < 0.05), whereas FI, F/G, and caloric conversion were lower (p < 0.05) in the MEP and HEP groups. During days 29-42, birds fed with LEP and HEP diets had lower (p < 0.05) BWG but higher F/G and caloric conversion compared with those fed with the MEP diet. Birds fed with the LEP diet had higher (p < 0.05) BWG than those fed with MEP and HEP diets throughout the experiment. The abdominal fat yield in the LEP group was lower (p < 0.05) than in the HEP group. Birds fed with the LEP diet had higher (p < 0.05) left breast meat yields than those fed with MEP and HEP diets. The roasting loss in the LEP and HEP groups was lower (p < 0.05) than in the MEP group. Birds fed with LEP and HEP diets had higher (p < 0.05) comprehensive scores, flavor scores, scent scores, and taste scores, but lower color scores compared with those fed with the MEP diet. In summary, the LEP diet with the lowest cost may be the most appropriate based on growth performance, roasting loss, and taste scores.
期刊介绍:
Frontiers in Veterinary Science is a global, peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that bridges animal and human health, brings a comparative approach to medical and surgical challenges, and advances innovative biotechnology and therapy.
Veterinary research today is interdisciplinary, collaborative, and socially relevant, transforming how we understand and investigate animal health and disease. Fundamental research in emerging infectious diseases, predictive genomics, stem cell therapy, and translational modelling is grounded within the integrative social context of public and environmental health, wildlife conservation, novel biomarkers, societal well-being, and cutting-edge clinical practice and specialization. Frontiers in Veterinary Science brings a 21st-century approach—networked, collaborative, and Open Access—to communicate this progress and innovation to both the specialist and to the wider audience of readers in the field.
Frontiers in Veterinary Science publishes articles on outstanding discoveries across a wide spectrum of translational, foundational, and clinical research. The journal''s mission is to bring all relevant veterinary sciences together on a single platform with the goal of improving animal and human health.