Alberto Guijosa, Shayna Sarosiek, Jorge J Castillo
{"title":"Current and emerging treatment perspectives for adults with Waldenström macroglobulinemia.","authors":"Alberto Guijosa, Shayna Sarosiek, Jorge J Castillo","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2025.2488312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) is distinguished from other indolent lymphomas by its unique molecular landscape and clinical behavior. With the emergence of new therapeutic options and improved survival rates, it has become increasingly important to balance the goal of prolonging survival with minimizing treatment-related toxicities.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review focuses on the current therapeutic strategies for WM, emphasizing the clinical effectiveness of various agents and treatment groups and their associated toxicity profiles. Additionally, we discuss emerging therapies and combinations, which have shown encouraging preliminary results.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>WM remains an incurable disease, yet its indolent nature and the growing array of therapeutic options have significantly improved outcomes in first- and subsequent-line settings. Chemoimmunotherapy and BTK inhibitors have demonstrated high efficacy and durable responses, with the latter offering a stem-cell-sparing approach. However, unlike in CLL or multiple myeloma, evidence supporting the superiority of targeted agents over chemoimmunotherapy is not available. Consequently, treatment decisions depend on patient characteristics and shared decision-making to carefully balance risks, select appropriate regimens, and encourage clinical trial participation to advance in understanding this rare disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2025.2488312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) is distinguished from other indolent lymphomas by its unique molecular landscape and clinical behavior. With the emergence of new therapeutic options and improved survival rates, it has become increasingly important to balance the goal of prolonging survival with minimizing treatment-related toxicities.
Areas covered: This review focuses on the current therapeutic strategies for WM, emphasizing the clinical effectiveness of various agents and treatment groups and their associated toxicity profiles. Additionally, we discuss emerging therapies and combinations, which have shown encouraging preliminary results.
Expert opinion: WM remains an incurable disease, yet its indolent nature and the growing array of therapeutic options have significantly improved outcomes in first- and subsequent-line settings. Chemoimmunotherapy and BTK inhibitors have demonstrated high efficacy and durable responses, with the latter offering a stem-cell-sparing approach. However, unlike in CLL or multiple myeloma, evidence supporting the superiority of targeted agents over chemoimmunotherapy is not available. Consequently, treatment decisions depend on patient characteristics and shared decision-making to carefully balance risks, select appropriate regimens, and encourage clinical trial participation to advance in understanding this rare disease.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.