Multispecialty sessions model for comprehensive care and decision-making in cancer patients.

IF 1.2 Q4 ONCOLOGY
ecancermedicalscience Pub Date : 2025-01-22 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3332/ecancer.2025.1830
Kiara S Berumen, Alberto Sánchez-Navarro, Andrea Velázquez, Manuel Solano, Francisco Anaya, Gustavo Rosales, Alexandra Díaz, Johana Jazer, Kathia Zamudio, Susana Suder, Marisol Quintero, Adriana González-Martínez, Luis A García
{"title":"Multispecialty sessions model for comprehensive care and decision-making in cancer patients.","authors":"Kiara S Berumen, Alberto Sánchez-Navarro, Andrea Velázquez, Manuel Solano, Francisco Anaya, Gustavo Rosales, Alexandra Díaz, Johana Jazer, Kathia Zamudio, Susana Suder, Marisol Quintero, Adriana González-Martínez, Luis A García","doi":"10.3332/ecancer.2025.1830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The management of the oncology patient is complex, due to late diagnosis, treatment and costs, affecting the medical, psychological, nutritional and economic areas. The creation of a multispecialty team, with specialists from health and other fields, is the characteristic of the institute. Since 1920, multidisciplinary has evolved and stood out in developed countries; in Mexico and continues to grow. Although it presents challenges, such as lack of time and coordination, its implementation significantly improves the comprehensive approach to patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study conducted at the Instituto Oncológico Nacional (ION) in Guadalajara, Mexico, was conducted from April 2019 to December 2023, involving multispecialty sessions via Zoom for oncology patients. Information were collected from medical records with specific inclusion criteria, for the creation of a database in Excel and subsequent analysis with the IBM SPSS Statistics 22 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>93.09% of the patients were placed in a specialised unit, while 6.91% in 'other tumours'. 37.2% of the sessions were held to establish treatment, 32% for diagnosis and 30.8% for both. The breast tumour unit had the most sessions (15%) and the robotic surgery unit had the least sessions (0.8%). 74.9% of the cases required one session and 25.1% required more sessions. An average saving of 5 consultations were generated; 68.8% of the sessions met their objectives and were followed up.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Multispecialty virtual sessions in ION generate significant benefits: they reduce waiting times, save resources, improve access to specialised units and a comprehensive approach. Success is due to team coordination, communication between specialists and patients and implementation of decision making. It is recommended to promote this approach to optimise clinical outcomes and quality of life, overcoming logistical barriers and evaluating its long-term impact.</p>","PeriodicalId":11460,"journal":{"name":"ecancermedicalscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1830"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ecancermedicalscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2025.1830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The management of the oncology patient is complex, due to late diagnosis, treatment and costs, affecting the medical, psychological, nutritional and economic areas. The creation of a multispecialty team, with specialists from health and other fields, is the characteristic of the institute. Since 1920, multidisciplinary has evolved and stood out in developed countries; in Mexico and continues to grow. Although it presents challenges, such as lack of time and coordination, its implementation significantly improves the comprehensive approach to patients.

Methods: A retrospective study conducted at the Instituto Oncológico Nacional (ION) in Guadalajara, Mexico, was conducted from April 2019 to December 2023, involving multispecialty sessions via Zoom for oncology patients. Information were collected from medical records with specific inclusion criteria, for the creation of a database in Excel and subsequent analysis with the IBM SPSS Statistics 22 tool.

Results: 93.09% of the patients were placed in a specialised unit, while 6.91% in 'other tumours'. 37.2% of the sessions were held to establish treatment, 32% for diagnosis and 30.8% for both. The breast tumour unit had the most sessions (15%) and the robotic surgery unit had the least sessions (0.8%). 74.9% of the cases required one session and 25.1% required more sessions. An average saving of 5 consultations were generated; 68.8% of the sessions met their objectives and were followed up.

Conclusion: Multispecialty virtual sessions in ION generate significant benefits: they reduce waiting times, save resources, improve access to specialised units and a comprehensive approach. Success is due to team coordination, communication between specialists and patients and implementation of decision making. It is recommended to promote this approach to optimise clinical outcomes and quality of life, overcoming logistical barriers and evaluating its long-term impact.

癌症患者综合护理和决策的多专科会议模式。
肿瘤患者的管理较为复杂,由于诊断晚、治疗费时,影响到医疗、心理、营养和经济等领域。该研究所的特点是建立了一个由卫生和其他领域的专家组成的多专业小组。自1920年以来,多学科发展并在发达国家脱颖而出;并且还在继续增长。尽管它存在挑战,如缺乏时间和协调,但它的实施显著改善了对患者的综合治疗方法。方法:2019年4月至2023年12月,在墨西哥瓜达拉哈拉的Oncológico国家研究所(ION)进行了一项回顾性研究,包括通过Zoom对肿瘤患者进行多专业会议。从具有特定纳入标准的病历中收集信息,在Excel中创建数据库,随后使用IBM SPSS Statistics 22工具进行分析。结果:93.09%的患者被安置在专科病房,而6.91%的患者被安置在“其他肿瘤”。37.2%的会议用于确定治疗,32%用于诊断,30.8%用于两者。乳腺肿瘤部门的疗程最多(15%),机器人手术部门的疗程最少(0.8%)。74.9%的病例需要一次治疗,25.1%的病例需要多次治疗。平均节省5次会诊;68.8%的会议达到了目标并采取了后续行动。结论:ION的多专业虚拟会议产生了显著的好处:它们减少了等待时间,节省了资源,改善了对专业单位的访问和综合方法。成功取决于团队的协调、专家与患者之间的沟通和决策的执行。建议推广这种方法,以优化临床结果和生活质量,克服后勤障碍并评估其长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
138
审稿时长
27 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信