Evaluating nurse preferences for a novel on-body delivery system vs. manual syringes for large-volume subcutaneous drug administration: a survey study.

IF 6.5 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drug Delivery Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1080/10717544.2025.2484278
Mehul Desai, Beth Faiman, Lisa A Gorski, Ashley Miles, Valentina Sterlin, Nicole Curry
{"title":"Evaluating nurse preferences for a novel on-body delivery system vs. manual syringes for large-volume subcutaneous drug administration: a survey study.","authors":"Mehul Desai, Beth Faiman, Lisa A Gorski, Ashley Miles, Valentina Sterlin, Nicole Curry","doi":"10.1080/10717544.2025.2484278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While nurses report challenges with the manual administration of large-volume subcutaneous drugs, these challenges and potential solutions are not captured in the literature. In this cross-sectional study, 45 nurses with experience administering large-volume subcutaneous biologics completed an 18-item survey about preferences for syringes vs. on-body delivery systems. 100% responded that an on-body delivery system seemed easy to learn and use and preferable to syringes. In a drug delivery scenario including comprehensive administration details and assuming equivalent safety and efficacy, 97.78% preferred the on-body delivery system to a daratumumab/hyaluronidase syringe. In the total sample, this preference was primarily attributed to (1) reduced nurse effort due to hands-free delivery, (2) decreased patient pain due to a thinner needle, (3) elimination of needlestick injuries due to a hidden needle, and (4) increased clinic efficiency due to hands-free delivery. 95.56% felt that the on-body delivery system would improve clinic throughput better than syringes. Nurses reported that an on-body delivery system would be easy to learn and use and would improve clinic efficiency and safety. They underscored the importance of decreasing nurse physical burden, needlestick injuries, and patient needle phobia. Contrary to the assumption that speed is paramount, nurses prioritized reducing effort, enhancing administration safety, and improving patient comfort over injection speed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11679,"journal":{"name":"Drug Delivery","volume":"32 1","pages":"2484278"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10717544.2025.2484278","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While nurses report challenges with the manual administration of large-volume subcutaneous drugs, these challenges and potential solutions are not captured in the literature. In this cross-sectional study, 45 nurses with experience administering large-volume subcutaneous biologics completed an 18-item survey about preferences for syringes vs. on-body delivery systems. 100% responded that an on-body delivery system seemed easy to learn and use and preferable to syringes. In a drug delivery scenario including comprehensive administration details and assuming equivalent safety and efficacy, 97.78% preferred the on-body delivery system to a daratumumab/hyaluronidase syringe. In the total sample, this preference was primarily attributed to (1) reduced nurse effort due to hands-free delivery, (2) decreased patient pain due to a thinner needle, (3) elimination of needlestick injuries due to a hidden needle, and (4) increased clinic efficiency due to hands-free delivery. 95.56% felt that the on-body delivery system would improve clinic throughput better than syringes. Nurses reported that an on-body delivery system would be easy to learn and use and would improve clinic efficiency and safety. They underscored the importance of decreasing nurse physical burden, needlestick injuries, and patient needle phobia. Contrary to the assumption that speed is paramount, nurses prioritized reducing effort, enhancing administration safety, and improving patient comfort over injection speed.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Drug Delivery
Drug Delivery 医学-药学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
250
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Drug Delivery is an open access journal serving the academic and industrial communities with peer reviewed coverage of basic research, development, and application principles of drug delivery and targeting at molecular, cellular, and higher levels. Topics covered include all delivery systems including oral, pulmonary, nasal, parenteral and transdermal, and modes of entry such as controlled release systems; microcapsules, liposomes, vesicles, and macromolecular conjugates; antibody targeting; protein/peptide delivery; DNA, oligonucleotide and siRNA delivery. Papers on drug dosage forms and their optimization will not be considered unless they directly relate to the original drug delivery issues. Published articles present original research and critical reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信