Impact of pullback speed on evaluation of lipid core plaque using near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound.

IF 3.1 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tetsuharu Kasahara, Hideki Kitahara, Kenta Takou, Kazuya Tateishi, Yuichi Saito, Ken Kato, Takashi Iimori, Yoshio Kobayashi
{"title":"Impact of pullback speed on evaluation of lipid core plaque using near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound.","authors":"Tetsuharu Kasahara, Hideki Kitahara, Kenta Takou, Kazuya Tateishi, Yuichi Saito, Ken Kato, Takashi Iimori, Yoshio Kobayashi","doi":"10.1007/s12928-025-01124-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) can assess the amount of lipid core plaque, and the latest generation catheter allows for imaging at several different pullback speeds. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of pullback speed on evaluation of lipid core plaque using the latest generation NIRS-IVUS catheter. Patients with coronary artery disease who underwent coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention with NIRS-IVUS examination at 2 different pullback speeds (0.5 and 2.0 mm/sec) for the same vessel were enrolled. The values of lipid core burden index (LCBI) and maxLCBI4mm were compared between the images recorded with pullback speeds of 0.5 and 2.0 mm/sec, and match or mismatch of the location where maxLCBI4mm was detected was investigated. In a total of 286 NIRS-IVUS image sets, the location of maxLCBI4mm measured at 0.5 and 2.0 mm/sec was mismatched in 81 (28.3%) image sets. In comparison by vessel type, 20.8% were mismatched in LAD, 31.1% in LCx, and 37.8% in RCA (p = 0.023). In 205 image sets with matched maxLCBI4mm location, the maxLCBI4mm value at 2.0 mm/sec was significantly greater compared with that at 0.5 mm/sec (348.0 vs. 302.0 in median, p < 0.001). In a substantial proportion of patients, the location of maxLCBI4mm values measured at 0.5 and 2.0 mm/sec was mismatched. In the image sets with matched maxLCBI4mm location, the maxLCBI4mm value at 2.0 mm/sec was significantly greater compared with that at 0.5 mm/sec. These results should be noted when applying the cut-off values of maxLCBI4mm recorded at 2.0 mm/sec.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-025-01124-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Near-infrared spectroscopy-intravascular ultrasound (NIRS-IVUS) can assess the amount of lipid core plaque, and the latest generation catheter allows for imaging at several different pullback speeds. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of pullback speed on evaluation of lipid core plaque using the latest generation NIRS-IVUS catheter. Patients with coronary artery disease who underwent coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention with NIRS-IVUS examination at 2 different pullback speeds (0.5 and 2.0 mm/sec) for the same vessel were enrolled. The values of lipid core burden index (LCBI) and maxLCBI4mm were compared between the images recorded with pullback speeds of 0.5 and 2.0 mm/sec, and match or mismatch of the location where maxLCBI4mm was detected was investigated. In a total of 286 NIRS-IVUS image sets, the location of maxLCBI4mm measured at 0.5 and 2.0 mm/sec was mismatched in 81 (28.3%) image sets. In comparison by vessel type, 20.8% were mismatched in LAD, 31.1% in LCx, and 37.8% in RCA (p = 0.023). In 205 image sets with matched maxLCBI4mm location, the maxLCBI4mm value at 2.0 mm/sec was significantly greater compared with that at 0.5 mm/sec (348.0 vs. 302.0 in median, p < 0.001). In a substantial proportion of patients, the location of maxLCBI4mm values measured at 0.5 and 2.0 mm/sec was mismatched. In the image sets with matched maxLCBI4mm location, the maxLCBI4mm value at 2.0 mm/sec was significantly greater compared with that at 0.5 mm/sec. These results should be noted when applying the cut-off values of maxLCBI4mm recorded at 2.0 mm/sec.

用近红外光谱-血管内超声评价回拉速度对脂质核心斑块的影响。
近红外光谱-血管内超声(NIRS-IVUS)可以评估脂质核心斑块的数量,最新一代导管允许在几种不同的回拉速度下成像。本研究的目的是研究使用最新一代NIRS-IVUS导管后拉速度对脂质核心斑块评估的影响。冠状动脉疾病患者接受冠状动脉造影或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗,并以2种不同的回拉速度(0.5和2.0 mm/sec)对同一条血管进行NIRS-IVUS检查。比较回拉速度为0.5 mm/sec和2.0 mm/sec时记录的图像的脂质核心负荷指数(LCBI)和maxLCBI4mm的值,并研究maxLCBI4mm检测位置的匹配或不匹配。在286个NIRS-IVUS图像集中,在0.5和2.0 mm/sec下测量的maxLCBI4mm图像集中,有81个(28.3%)图像集的位置不匹配。按血管类型比较,LAD错配率为20.8%,LCx为31.1%,RCA为37.8% (p = 0.023)。在205个匹配maxLCBI4mm位置的图像集中,2.0 mm/sec时的maxLCBI4mm值明显大于0.5 mm/sec时的maxLCBI4mm值(中位数为348.0比302.0,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) is an international journal covering the field of cardiovascular disease and includes cardiac (coronary and noncoronary) and peripheral interventions and therapeutics. Articles are subject to peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability. CVIT is an official journal of The Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信