Xiao Chen, Junji Cao, Robert L Sinsabaugh, Daryl L Moorhead, Richard D Bardgett, Nicolas Fanin, Andrew T Nottingham, Xunhua Zheng, Ji Chen
{"title":"Soil extracellular enzymes as drivers of soil carbon storage under nitrogen addition.","authors":"Xiao Chen, Junji Cao, Robert L Sinsabaugh, Daryl L Moorhead, Richard D Bardgett, Nicolas Fanin, Andrew T Nottingham, Xunhua Zheng, Ji Chen","doi":"10.1111/brv.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enhanced anthropogenic nitrogen (N) inputs to ecosystems may have substantial impacts on microbially mediated soil organic carbon (SOC) cycling. One way to link species-rich soil microbial communities with SOC cycling processes is via soil extracellular enzyme activities (EEAs). However, the effects of N addition on EEAs and the associated driving factors remain poorly understood. By conducting a meta-analysis, we find that N addition increases hydrolytic C-degrading EEAs that target simple polysaccharides decomposition by 12.8%, but decreases oxidative C-degrading EEAs that degrade complex phenolic macromolecules by 11.9%. The net effect of N addition on SOC storage is determined by the shifts between these two types of C-degrading EEAs, and the impacts varied across different ecosystem types. These insights highlight the crucial but understudied roles of hydrolytic and oxidative C-degrading EEAs on SOC dynamics with ongoing enhanced anthropogenic N loading. Understanding the mechanisms behind these C-degrading EEAs could help optimize SOC sequestration and inform climate mitigation strategies across different ecosystems.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.70021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Enhanced anthropogenic nitrogen (N) inputs to ecosystems may have substantial impacts on microbially mediated soil organic carbon (SOC) cycling. One way to link species-rich soil microbial communities with SOC cycling processes is via soil extracellular enzyme activities (EEAs). However, the effects of N addition on EEAs and the associated driving factors remain poorly understood. By conducting a meta-analysis, we find that N addition increases hydrolytic C-degrading EEAs that target simple polysaccharides decomposition by 12.8%, but decreases oxidative C-degrading EEAs that degrade complex phenolic macromolecules by 11.9%. The net effect of N addition on SOC storage is determined by the shifts between these two types of C-degrading EEAs, and the impacts varied across different ecosystem types. These insights highlight the crucial but understudied roles of hydrolytic and oxidative C-degrading EEAs on SOC dynamics with ongoing enhanced anthropogenic N loading. Understanding the mechanisms behind these C-degrading EEAs could help optimize SOC sequestration and inform climate mitigation strategies across different ecosystems.
期刊介绍:
Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly.
The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions.
The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field.
Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.