Web-based interventions for treatment-seeking individuals with hazardous alcohol consumption: analysis of clinical characteristics and motives for abstinence.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Nathalie Stüben, Rosa Muscheidt, Falk Kiefer, Michael Soyka
{"title":"Web-based interventions for treatment-seeking individuals with hazardous alcohol consumption: analysis of clinical characteristics and motives for abstinence.","authors":"Nathalie Stüben, Rosa Muscheidt, Falk Kiefer, Michael Soyka","doi":"10.1093/alcalc/agaf015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study compared individuals with hazardous alcohol consumption who used the web-based intervention \"Ohne Alkohol mit Nathalie\" (OAMN) with individuals who relied exclusively on traditional support to enhance the understanding of OAMN user characteristics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey included 2460 treatment-seeking participants with Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test scores ≥8 indicating hazardous alcohol use. The OAMN group (n = 1825) included individuals who had used OAMN programs, while the non-OAMN group (n = 635) relied exclusively on traditional support. Analyses compared sociodemographic characteristics, psychiatric comorbidities, the extent to which OAMN was used as a standalone or complementary tool, alcohol consumption, and abstinence motives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups were predominantly female and highly educated, but these characteristics were more pronounced among OAMN users. About one-third of OAMN users relied exclusively on the examined intervention, while two-thirds combined it with other forms of support. Non-OAMN users exhibited higher psychiatric comorbidities and had higher Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test scores. Intrinsic motives were key drivers for abstinence in both groups, while these motives were more pronounced among OAMN users and extrinsic motives were more frequently reported by non-OAMN users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings show that OAMN primarily attracts well-educated women and that it's used as both a standalone and complementary intervention. OAMN users were more likely to report intrinsic motives such as improving well-being and autonomy as key drivers for abstinence and less likely to report extrinsic motives such as external expectations and fear. These insights enhance understanding of the characteristics and abstinence motives of individuals engaging with OAMN.</p>","PeriodicalId":7407,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol and alcoholism","volume":"60 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol and alcoholism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agaf015","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study compared individuals with hazardous alcohol consumption who used the web-based intervention "Ohne Alkohol mit Nathalie" (OAMN) with individuals who relied exclusively on traditional support to enhance the understanding of OAMN user characteristics.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey included 2460 treatment-seeking participants with Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test scores ≥8 indicating hazardous alcohol use. The OAMN group (n = 1825) included individuals who had used OAMN programs, while the non-OAMN group (n = 635) relied exclusively on traditional support. Analyses compared sociodemographic characteristics, psychiatric comorbidities, the extent to which OAMN was used as a standalone or complementary tool, alcohol consumption, and abstinence motives.

Results: Both groups were predominantly female and highly educated, but these characteristics were more pronounced among OAMN users. About one-third of OAMN users relied exclusively on the examined intervention, while two-thirds combined it with other forms of support. Non-OAMN users exhibited higher psychiatric comorbidities and had higher Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test scores. Intrinsic motives were key drivers for abstinence in both groups, while these motives were more pronounced among OAMN users and extrinsic motives were more frequently reported by non-OAMN users.

Conclusion: These findings show that OAMN primarily attracts well-educated women and that it's used as both a standalone and complementary intervention. OAMN users were more likely to report intrinsic motives such as improving well-being and autonomy as key drivers for abstinence and less likely to report extrinsic motives such as external expectations and fear. These insights enhance understanding of the characteristics and abstinence motives of individuals engaging with OAMN.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Alcohol and alcoholism
Alcohol and alcoholism 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Alcohol and Alcoholism publishes papers on the biomedical, psychological, and sociological aspects of alcoholism and alcohol research, provided that they make a new and significant contribution to knowledge in the field. Papers include new results obtained experimentally, descriptions of new experimental (including clinical) methods of importance to the field of alcohol research and treatment, or new interpretations of existing results. Theoretical contributions are considered equally with papers dealing with experimental work provided that such theoretical contributions are not of a largely speculative or philosophical nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信