Collective memories and understandings of human societies.

IF 16.6 1区心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

Behavioral and Brain Sciences Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1017/S0140525X2400116X

Ana Figueiredo, Magdalena Bobowik, Emanuele Politi

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Moffett's article asserts that human societies are distinct from other social groups because they must maintain control over specific territories. In our commentary, we challenge this argument, aiming to enrich it by highlighting the pivotal role of history and collective memories and their underestimated significance in shaping societies across time and beyond territorial ownership and resource control.

查看原文本刊更多论文

集体记忆和对人类社会的理解。

莫菲特的文章断言，人类社会有别于其他社会群体，因为它们必须保持对特定领土的控制。在我们的评论中，我们对这一论点提出了质疑，旨在通过强调历史和集体记忆的关键作用，以及它们在塑造跨越时间、超越领土所有权和资源控制的社会方面被低估的意义，来丰富这一论点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 医学-行为科学

CiteScore

1.40

自引率

1.70%

发文量

353

期刊介绍： Behavioral and Brain Sciences (BBS) is a highly respected journal that employs an innovative approach called Open Peer Commentary. This format allows for the publication of noteworthy and contentious research from various fields including psychology, neuroscience, behavioral biology, and cognitive science. Each article is accompanied by 20-40 commentaries from experts across these disciplines, as well as a response from the author themselves. This unique setup creates a captivating forum for the exchange of ideas, critical analysis, and the integration of research within the behavioral and brain sciences, spanning topics from molecular neurobiology and artificial intelligence to the philosophy of the mind.