Feed intake, milk production and feed conversion of dairy cows fed re-ensiled press cake from grass-clover silage compared to unprocessed grass-clover silage.

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Georg Terler, Manuel Winter, Reinhard Resch, Hannes Rohrer, Christian Fasching, Michael Mandl, Joseph Sweeney, Kevin McDonnell, Andreas Steinwidder
{"title":"Feed intake, milk production and feed conversion of dairy cows fed re-ensiled press cake from grass-clover silage compared to unprocessed grass-clover silage.","authors":"Georg Terler, Manuel Winter, Reinhard Resch, Hannes Rohrer, Christian Fasching, Michael Mandl, Joseph Sweeney, Kevin McDonnell, Andreas Steinwidder","doi":"10.1080/1745039X.2025.2473590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Press cake silage (PCS) is a by-product of biorefining, which can substitute unprocessed grass or grass-clover silage (GCS) in ruminant feeding. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of including re-ensiled PCS from GCS in dairy cows' diet on feed intake, milk production and composition, feed conversion, apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) as well as feed sorting and rumination behaviour compared to a control ration. Three total mixed rations (TMR) were tested in this experiment differing in PCS and GCS proportion in forage: 0% PCS and 50% GCS (CON), 25% PCS and 25% GCS (PCS25) and 50% PCS and 0% GCS (PCS50). The study was designed as a cross-over trial with six Holstein Friesian and nine Simmental cows (average 624 ± 68 kg body weight and 60 ± 20 days in milk at the start of the trial). The experiment consisted of three experimental runs, each lasting for 35 days with a 14 days adaptation phase and a 21 days measurement period. Diets were fed as TMR containing 37% grass silage, 26% concentrates and differing proportions of PCS or GCS depending on experimental group (37% GCS in CON, 18.5% PCS and 18.5% GCS in PCS25, 37% PCS in PCS50). Dry matter intake of dairy cows was higher in the PCS25 compared to the PCS50 group with both groups being not different from the CON treatment. Energy-corrected milk (ECM) production was lowest in the PCS50 group but did not differ significantly between treatments. Milk composition was also similar in all three treatments, except for milk urea content, which was lower in the PCS50 group. Moreover, ATTD of crude protein and ruminal nitrogen balance as well as phosphorus intake and the phosphorus effort for production of 1 kg ECM decreased with rising PCS inclusion in the diet. In contrast, no differences between treatments were found for dry matter, crude protein and energy effort for ECM production as well as for feed sorting and rumination behaviour. In conclusion, replacing GCS by re-ensiled PCS in TMR-diets did not affect ECM production and feed conversion of dairy cows while increasing the utilisation of crude protein and phosphorus. Therefore, re-ensiled PCS can substitute GCS in dairy cows' TMR-diets. However, the long-term effects of decreased phosphorus intake and ATTD of crude protein in cows fed PCS-rich diets should be examined in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8157,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Animal Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Animal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2025.2473590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Press cake silage (PCS) is a by-product of biorefining, which can substitute unprocessed grass or grass-clover silage (GCS) in ruminant feeding. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of including re-ensiled PCS from GCS in dairy cows' diet on feed intake, milk production and composition, feed conversion, apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) as well as feed sorting and rumination behaviour compared to a control ration. Three total mixed rations (TMR) were tested in this experiment differing in PCS and GCS proportion in forage: 0% PCS and 50% GCS (CON), 25% PCS and 25% GCS (PCS25) and 50% PCS and 0% GCS (PCS50). The study was designed as a cross-over trial with six Holstein Friesian and nine Simmental cows (average 624 ± 68 kg body weight and 60 ± 20 days in milk at the start of the trial). The experiment consisted of three experimental runs, each lasting for 35 days with a 14 days adaptation phase and a 21 days measurement period. Diets were fed as TMR containing 37% grass silage, 26% concentrates and differing proportions of PCS or GCS depending on experimental group (37% GCS in CON, 18.5% PCS and 18.5% GCS in PCS25, 37% PCS in PCS50). Dry matter intake of dairy cows was higher in the PCS25 compared to the PCS50 group with both groups being not different from the CON treatment. Energy-corrected milk (ECM) production was lowest in the PCS50 group but did not differ significantly between treatments. Milk composition was also similar in all three treatments, except for milk urea content, which was lower in the PCS50 group. Moreover, ATTD of crude protein and ruminal nitrogen balance as well as phosphorus intake and the phosphorus effort for production of 1 kg ECM decreased with rising PCS inclusion in the diet. In contrast, no differences between treatments were found for dry matter, crude protein and energy effort for ECM production as well as for feed sorting and rumination behaviour. In conclusion, replacing GCS by re-ensiled PCS in TMR-diets did not affect ECM production and feed conversion of dairy cows while increasing the utilisation of crude protein and phosphorus. Therefore, re-ensiled PCS can substitute GCS in dairy cows' TMR-diets. However, the long-term effects of decreased phosphorus intake and ATTD of crude protein in cows fed PCS-rich diets should be examined in future studies.

草叶苜蓿青贮再青贮压榨饼与未加工草叶苜蓿青贮的采食量、产奶量和饲料转化率比较
压榨饼青贮(PCS)是生物精炼的副产品,可以替代未加工的草或草三叶草青贮(GCS)用于反刍动物的饲养。本研究旨在研究与对照日粮相比,在奶牛日粮中添加GCS再青贮PCS对采食量、产奶量和成分、饲料转化率、表观全消化道消化率(ATTD)以及饲料分选和反刍行为的影响。本试验采用三种不同PCS和GCS在饲料中比例的全混合日粮(TMR): 0% PCS和50% GCS (CON)、25% PCS和25% GCS (PCS25)和50% PCS和0% GCS (PCS50)。本研究采用交叉试验设计,选用6头荷斯坦弗里西亚奶牛和9头西蒙塔尔奶牛(试验开始时平均体重624±68 kg,泌乳60±20 d)。试验分3期进行,每期35 d,其中预试期14 d,正试期21 d。饲粮中添加37%的草青贮、26%的精料和不同比例的PCS或GCS (CON为37% GCS, PCS25为18.5% PCS和18.5% GCS, PCS50为37% PCS)。PCS25组奶牛干物质采食量高于PCS50组,且与CON处理无显著差异。能量校正乳(ECM)产量在PCS50组最低,但处理间无显著差异。除PCS50组乳尿素含量较低外,三种处理的乳成分也相似。随着饲料中PCS添加量的增加,粗蛋白质ATTD、瘤胃氮平衡、磷采食量和生产1 kg ECM所需的磷努力量均降低。相比之下,不同处理之间的干物质、粗蛋白质和能量消耗以及饲料分选和反刍行为没有差异。综上所述,在tmr饲粮中,用重青贮PCS替代GCS不影响奶牛的ECM产量和饲料转化率,但提高了粗蛋白质和磷的利用率。因此,再青贮PCS可以替代奶牛tmr饲粮中的GCS。然而,在未来的研究中,应进一步研究富pcs日粮中磷摄入量和粗蛋白质ATTD的降低对奶牛的长期影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of Animal Nutrition
Archives of Animal Nutrition 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
5.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Animal Nutrition is an international journal covering the biochemical and physiological basis of animal nutrition. Emphasis is laid on original papers on protein and amino acid metabolism, energy transformation, mineral metabolism, vitamin metabolism, nutritional effects on intestinal and body functions in combination with performance criteria, respectively. It furthermore deals with recent developments in practical animal feeding, feedstuff theory, mode of action of feed additives, feedstuff preservation and feedstuff processing. The spectrum covers all relevant animal species including food producing and companion animals, but not aquatic species. Seldom can priority be given to papers covering more descriptive studies, even if they may be interesting and technically sound or of impact for animal production, or for topics of relevance for only particular regional conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信