Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in the World Trade Center Health Program General Responder Cohort

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Christopher R. Dasaro, Ahmad Sabra, Henry S. Sacks, Benjamin J. Luft, Denise J. Harrison, Iris G. Udasin, Michael A. Crane, Jacqueline M. Moline, Winston Kwa, Andrew C. Todd, Nancy L. Sloan, Susan L. Teitelbaum
{"title":"Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in the World Trade Center Health Program General Responder Cohort","authors":"Christopher R. Dasaro,&nbsp;Ahmad Sabra,&nbsp;Henry S. Sacks,&nbsp;Benjamin J. Luft,&nbsp;Denise J. Harrison,&nbsp;Iris G. Udasin,&nbsp;Michael A. Crane,&nbsp;Jacqueline M. Moline,&nbsp;Winston Kwa,&nbsp;Andrew C. Todd,&nbsp;Nancy L. Sloan,&nbsp;Susan L. Teitelbaum","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>People participating in the rescue, recovery, and clean-up effort after the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center (WTC) were exposed to a complex mix of noxious substances and subsequently experienced elevated gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) incidence, the second-most-common WTC-related condition.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Longitudinal WTC Health Program data, collected between July 2002 and December 2022, were used to describe the sample characteristics, diagnostic procedures, and treatment of consenting cohort members with self-reported GERD who reported incident GERD for a year or longer (<i>n</i> = 19,067). Cross-tabulations and binomial logistic regression, adjusted for confounders including comorbidities, assessed the associations with intermittent and resolved, compared with unresolved, GERD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>12.6% of the study cohort reported intermittent GERD; 5.5% reported GERD resolution. Analyses indicated that most GERD resolution was reported by people of color and those with body mass index &lt;25, and by cohort members who had longer postdiagnosis follow-up and implemented dietary modifications together with proton pump inhibitors or Program-approved antacids. GERD-certified members who underwent endoscopy, used medications without dietary modifications, or used bed head-elevation, and those with Barrett's disease (5.8%) or esophageal cancer (0.1%) may have had more severe GERD and reported little resolution.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The use of GERD services was consistent with clinical guidelines. Members' implementing dietary modifications in conjunction with proton pump inhibitors or Program-approved antacids reported more resolution and may have had less severe GERD. Earlier diagnosis and intervention might increase earlier therapeutic resolution.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"68 5","pages":"473-483"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajim.23721","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

People participating in the rescue, recovery, and clean-up effort after the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center (WTC) were exposed to a complex mix of noxious substances and subsequently experienced elevated gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) incidence, the second-most-common WTC-related condition.

Methods

Longitudinal WTC Health Program data, collected between July 2002 and December 2022, were used to describe the sample characteristics, diagnostic procedures, and treatment of consenting cohort members with self-reported GERD who reported incident GERD for a year or longer (n = 19,067). Cross-tabulations and binomial logistic regression, adjusted for confounders including comorbidities, assessed the associations with intermittent and resolved, compared with unresolved, GERD.

Results

12.6% of the study cohort reported intermittent GERD; 5.5% reported GERD resolution. Analyses indicated that most GERD resolution was reported by people of color and those with body mass index <25, and by cohort members who had longer postdiagnosis follow-up and implemented dietary modifications together with proton pump inhibitors or Program-approved antacids. GERD-certified members who underwent endoscopy, used medications without dietary modifications, or used bed head-elevation, and those with Barrett's disease (5.8%) or esophageal cancer (0.1%) may have had more severe GERD and reported little resolution.

Conclusions

The use of GERD services was consistent with clinical guidelines. Members' implementing dietary modifications in conjunction with proton pump inhibitors or Program-approved antacids reported more resolution and may have had less severe GERD. Earlier diagnosis and intervention might increase earlier therapeutic resolution.

世界贸易中心健康计划一般应答者队列中的胃食管反流病
背景:2001年9月11日世界贸易中心(WTC)遇袭后,参与救援、恢复和清理工作的人们暴露于复杂的有毒物质混合物中,随后经历了胃食管反流病(GERD)发病率升高,这是世界贸易中心(WTC)相关的第二大常见疾病。方法:从2002年7月至2022年12月收集的纵向WTC健康计划数据用于描述样本特征、诊断程序和同意自报告发生GERD一年或更长时间的GERD队列成员的治疗(n = 19,067)。交叉表和二项逻辑回归,调整混杂因素,包括合并症,评估间歇性和消退性胃食管反流与未消退性胃食管反流的关系。结果:12.6%的研究队列报告间歇性胃食管反流;5.5%报告GERD解决。分析表明,有色人种和有体重指数的人报告了大多数胃食管反流的消退。结论:使用胃食管反流服务符合临床指南。与质子泵抑制剂或项目批准的抗酸剂一起实施饮食调整的成员报告了更多的解决方案,并且可能减轻了严重的胃反流。早期诊断和干预可能会增加早期治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
American journal of industrial medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信