A Kaleckian growth model of secular stagnation with induced innovation

IF 1 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS
Metroeconomica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1111/meca.12486
Marco Stamegna
{"title":"A Kaleckian growth model of secular stagnation with induced innovation","authors":"Marco Stamegna","doi":"10.1111/meca.12486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper works out a demand-led growth model that draws on the Kaleckian-Steindlian tradition to examine the relationships between income distribution, capacity utilization, and capital accumulation; on Goodwin-type growth cycle models to investigate the dynamic interaction between labour market and distributive conflict; and on the induced innovation literature to link labour productivity growth to income distribution. We find that: (i) an increase in the labour share driven by stronger workers' bargaining power leads to faster capital accumulation and labour productivity growth in the long run, irrespective of the short-run growth regime of the economy; (ii) a positive institutional shock to the labour share can either increase or decrease the long-run employment rate, depending on the short-run growth regime; and (iii) an increase in the labour share driven by negative technology shocks leads to faster capital accumulation and labour productivity growth in the long run only if the economy exhibits a short-run wage-led regime. This model then unifies classical/neo-Goodwinian and Kaleckian views on the long-run relationships between the labour share, employment, and growth within a more general Kaleckian framework of a labour-constrained economy with induced technical change.</p>","PeriodicalId":46885,"journal":{"name":"Metroeconomica","volume":"76 2","pages":"340-371"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metroeconomica","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/meca.12486","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper works out a demand-led growth model that draws on the Kaleckian-Steindlian tradition to examine the relationships between income distribution, capacity utilization, and capital accumulation; on Goodwin-type growth cycle models to investigate the dynamic interaction between labour market and distributive conflict; and on the induced innovation literature to link labour productivity growth to income distribution. We find that: (i) an increase in the labour share driven by stronger workers' bargaining power leads to faster capital accumulation and labour productivity growth in the long run, irrespective of the short-run growth regime of the economy; (ii) a positive institutional shock to the labour share can either increase or decrease the long-run employment rate, depending on the short-run growth regime; and (iii) an increase in the labour share driven by negative technology shocks leads to faster capital accumulation and labour productivity growth in the long run only if the economy exhibits a short-run wage-led regime. This model then unifies classical/neo-Goodwinian and Kaleckian views on the long-run relationships between the labour share, employment, and growth within a more general Kaleckian framework of a labour-constrained economy with induced technical change.

长期停滞与诱导创新的卡列奇增长模型
本文利用kaleckin - steindlian传统,构建了一个需求导向的增长模型来考察收入分配、产能利用和资本积累之间的关系;基于古德温型增长周期模型研究劳动力市场与分配冲突的动态交互作用;以及将劳动生产率增长与收入分配联系起来的诱导创新文献。我们发现:(1)无论经济的短期增长机制如何,由更强的工人议价能力驱动的劳动份额的增加,在长期内会导致更快的资本积累和劳动生产率增长;(ii)对劳动收入占比的积极制度性冲击可能会增加或降低长期就业率,这取决于短期增长机制;(iii)只有当经济表现出短期工资主导的体制时,由负面技术冲击驱动的劳动收入占比的增加,才能在长期内导致更快的资本积累和劳动生产率增长。然后,该模型将古典/新古德温主义和卡莱肯主义关于劳动份额、就业和增长之间长期关系的观点统一起来,并将其置于更一般的卡莱肯劳动约束经济框架中,并引入技术变革。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Metroeconomica
Metroeconomica ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信