Soil Temperatures Predict Smaller Niche Shifts Than Air Temperatures in Introduced Ant Species

IF 6.3 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY
Olivia K. Bates, Sébastien Ollier, Cleo Bertelsmeier
{"title":"Soil Temperatures Predict Smaller Niche Shifts Than Air Temperatures in Introduced Ant Species","authors":"Olivia K. Bates,&nbsp;Sébastien Ollier,&nbsp;Cleo Bertelsmeier","doi":"10.1111/geb.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>Introduced species can establish in climates outside of their native niche and undergo ‘niche shifts’. However, studies of niche shifts generally rely on above-ground climate data, neglecting the potential buffering effect of ground-level or soil climates.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Location</h3>\n \n <p>Global.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Time Period</h3>\n \n <p>Present.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Major Taxa Studied</h3>\n \n <p>\n <i>Formicidae.</i>\n </p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Here, we investigated the impact of soil temperatures on niche shifts in 95 introduced ant species using both ordination and hypervolume-based approaches. We compared niche shifts using air temperature and soil temperature.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Overall, between 65.2% and 82% of species (depending on the metric) exhibited smaller niche shifts when considering soil temperature, with varying levels of correlation between air- and soil-temperature niche shifts across species (Correlation coefficient range: 0.56–0.73). Furthermore, air and soil climate conditions were generally more uncoupled than expected at random. This suggests that species use microrefugia and that this may explain the lower levels of niche shifts observed when using microclimatic conditions. Ecological traits, nesting type, forest cover and spatial spread did not consistently impact the differences across metrics in soil temperature buffering of niche shifts among species. This highlights the need for experimental microclimatic research to explore species differences in air- versus ground-climatic niche shifts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We overall highlight the importance of incorporating ecologically relevant microclimatic data, particularly for small, ground-dwelling organisms like ants. This study emphasises the ongoing need for a nuanced understanding of the intricate interplay between air and soil temperatures in the context of niche dynamics. Ultimately, soil-level datasets may improve habitat suitability models, leading to more accurate predictions of establishment success for introduced species.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":176,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","volume":"34 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Biogeography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/geb.70038","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Introduced species can establish in climates outside of their native niche and undergo ‘niche shifts’. However, studies of niche shifts generally rely on above-ground climate data, neglecting the potential buffering effect of ground-level or soil climates.

Location

Global.

Time Period

Present.

Major Taxa Studied

Formicidae.

Methods

Here, we investigated the impact of soil temperatures on niche shifts in 95 introduced ant species using both ordination and hypervolume-based approaches. We compared niche shifts using air temperature and soil temperature.

Results

Overall, between 65.2% and 82% of species (depending on the metric) exhibited smaller niche shifts when considering soil temperature, with varying levels of correlation between air- and soil-temperature niche shifts across species (Correlation coefficient range: 0.56–0.73). Furthermore, air and soil climate conditions were generally more uncoupled than expected at random. This suggests that species use microrefugia and that this may explain the lower levels of niche shifts observed when using microclimatic conditions. Ecological traits, nesting type, forest cover and spatial spread did not consistently impact the differences across metrics in soil temperature buffering of niche shifts among species. This highlights the need for experimental microclimatic research to explore species differences in air- versus ground-climatic niche shifts.

Main Conclusions

We overall highlight the importance of incorporating ecologically relevant microclimatic data, particularly for small, ground-dwelling organisms like ants. This study emphasises the ongoing need for a nuanced understanding of the intricate interplay between air and soil temperatures in the context of niche dynamics. Ultimately, soil-level datasets may improve habitat suitability models, leading to more accurate predictions of establishment success for introduced species.

在引进的蚂蚁物种中,土壤温度预测的生态位变化比空气温度预测的要小
目的引进的物种可以在其原生生态位以外的气候中生存,并经历“生态位转移”。然而,生态位变化的研究通常依赖于地面气候数据,忽视了地面或土壤气候的潜在缓冲作用。位置 全球。时间:现在。蚁科主要分类群研究。方法采用排序法和超体积法研究了土壤温度对95种引进蚂蚁生态位变化的影响。我们利用空气温度和土壤温度比较生态位的变化。结果总体而言,考虑土壤温度时,65.2% ~ 82%的物种(取决于度量)表现出较小的生态位变化,不同物种间空气和土壤温度生态位变化的相关程度不同(相关系数范围为0.56 ~ 0.73)。此外,空气和土壤气候条件通常比随机预期的更不耦合。这表明物种使用微避难所,这可能解释了当使用微气候条件时观察到的生态位变化水平较低。生态性状、筑巢类型、森林覆盖和空间扩散对物种间土壤温度缓冲生态位变化的影响不一致。这突出了实验性小气候研究的必要性,以探索空气与地面气候生态位变化的物种差异。我们总体上强调了纳入生态相关小气候数据的重要性,特别是对于像蚂蚁这样的小型地面生物。这项研究强调了在生态位动力学背景下,对空气和土壤温度之间错综复杂的相互作用进行细致入微的理解的持续需求。最终,土壤水平数据集可以改进生境适宜性模型,从而更准确地预测引入物种的建立成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Biogeography
Global Ecology and Biogeography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
3.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Biogeography (GEB) welcomes papers that investigate broad-scale (in space, time and/or taxonomy), general patterns in the organization of ecological systems and assemblages, and the processes that underlie them. In particular, GEB welcomes studies that use macroecological methods, comparative analyses, meta-analyses, reviews, spatial analyses and modelling to arrive at general, conceptual conclusions. Studies in GEB need not be global in spatial extent, but the conclusions and implications of the study must be relevant to ecologists and biogeographers globally, rather than being limited to local areas, or specific taxa. Similarly, GEB is not limited to spatial studies; we are equally interested in the general patterns of nature through time, among taxa (e.g., body sizes, dispersal abilities), through the course of evolution, etc. Further, GEB welcomes papers that investigate general impacts of human activities on ecological systems in accordance with the above criteria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信