Lead Solubility in Drinking Water: A Comparison of Experimental Lead Solubility and Geochemical Modeling Predictions

Emory Hayden-Kaplan, Madeline Larsen, David Cornwell, Nancy McTigue, Jean-Claude Bonzongo, Benjamin Swaringen
{"title":"Lead Solubility in Drinking Water: A Comparison of Experimental Lead Solubility and Geochemical Modeling Predictions","authors":"Emory Hayden-Kaplan,&nbsp;Madeline Larsen,&nbsp;David Cornwell,&nbsp;Nancy McTigue,&nbsp;Jean-Claude Bonzongo,&nbsp;Benjamin Swaringen","doi":"10.1002/aws2.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Geochemical solubility modeling is a cost-effective method to estimate equilibrium lead (Pb) concentrations in drinking water under specific environmental conditions. Laboratory Pb-solubility studies (sometimes called coupon studies) are also economical and can generate comparative Pb solubility data for different water qualities. Both methods are widely used by utilities in screening corrosion control treatment, and both methods are assumed to provide insights on CCT for Pb without the influence of years of built-up scale. No research has compared the two methods to see if they give similar results for the same water. While these techniques have limitations and do not always represent Pb levels in service lines and premise plumbing, they are valuable for predicting Pb solubility trends under controlled conditions. In this study, Pb coupons immersed in chemically diverse waters provided experimental data on Pb solubility, which was then compared to predictions from two widely used geochemical models, MINEQL+ and LEADSOL. In tests without orthophosphate (PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup>), experimental Pb concentrations increased as pH decreased, consistent with model predictions. Between pH 7.5 and 8.5, Pb levels slightly declined as predicted by the model but were less dependent on dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) than model predictions. However, at pH 8.5–10, Pb concentrations remained constant experimentally, whereas the model predicted significant reductions in Pb. Neither MINEQL+ nor LEADSOL models and experimental data were statistically the same using the built-in constants. Adjusting Log K<sub><i>sp</i></sub> for hydrocerussite allowed the data and models to be statistically the same. In waters with PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup>, high DIC (50 mg/L as C) experimental results matched model predictions. At low DIC (3 mg/L as C), Pb concentrations varied less than modeled, and higher PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup> doses were needed to reduce Pb levels compared to low-DIC waters. Overall, geochemical modeling and Pb solubility studies provide critical insights into Pb control strategies, and either or both methods can help screen the impact of possible water quality changes on Pb levels. Solubility testing is preferred, as site-specific solubility constants are generally unknown. Using the solubility models' adjustments to Log <i>K</i><sub><i>sp</i></sub> described in this paper is recommended if the site-specific Log <i>K</i><sub><i>sp</i></sub> is unknown.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":101301,"journal":{"name":"AWWA water science","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AWWA water science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aws2.70020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geochemical solubility modeling is a cost-effective method to estimate equilibrium lead (Pb) concentrations in drinking water under specific environmental conditions. Laboratory Pb-solubility studies (sometimes called coupon studies) are also economical and can generate comparative Pb solubility data for different water qualities. Both methods are widely used by utilities in screening corrosion control treatment, and both methods are assumed to provide insights on CCT for Pb without the influence of years of built-up scale. No research has compared the two methods to see if they give similar results for the same water. While these techniques have limitations and do not always represent Pb levels in service lines and premise plumbing, they are valuable for predicting Pb solubility trends under controlled conditions. In this study, Pb coupons immersed in chemically diverse waters provided experimental data on Pb solubility, which was then compared to predictions from two widely used geochemical models, MINEQL+ and LEADSOL. In tests without orthophosphate (PO43−), experimental Pb concentrations increased as pH decreased, consistent with model predictions. Between pH 7.5 and 8.5, Pb levels slightly declined as predicted by the model but were less dependent on dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) than model predictions. However, at pH 8.5–10, Pb concentrations remained constant experimentally, whereas the model predicted significant reductions in Pb. Neither MINEQL+ nor LEADSOL models and experimental data were statistically the same using the built-in constants. Adjusting Log Ksp for hydrocerussite allowed the data and models to be statistically the same. In waters with PO43−, high DIC (50 mg/L as C) experimental results matched model predictions. At low DIC (3 mg/L as C), Pb concentrations varied less than modeled, and higher PO43− doses were needed to reduce Pb levels compared to low-DIC waters. Overall, geochemical modeling and Pb solubility studies provide critical insights into Pb control strategies, and either or both methods can help screen the impact of possible water quality changes on Pb levels. Solubility testing is preferred, as site-specific solubility constants are generally unknown. Using the solubility models' adjustments to Log Ksp described in this paper is recommended if the site-specific Log Ksp is unknown.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信