Lead Solubility in Drinking Water: A Comparison of Experimental Lead Solubility and Geochemical Modeling Predictions

Emory Hayden-Kaplan, Madeline Larsen, David Cornwell, Nancy McTigue, Jean-Claude Bonzongo, Benjamin Swaringen
{"title":"Lead Solubility in Drinking Water: A Comparison of Experimental Lead Solubility and Geochemical Modeling Predictions","authors":"Emory Hayden-Kaplan,&nbsp;Madeline Larsen,&nbsp;David Cornwell,&nbsp;Nancy McTigue,&nbsp;Jean-Claude Bonzongo,&nbsp;Benjamin Swaringen","doi":"10.1002/aws2.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Geochemical solubility modeling is a cost-effective method to estimate equilibrium lead (Pb) concentrations in drinking water under specific environmental conditions. Laboratory Pb-solubility studies (sometimes called coupon studies) are also economical and can generate comparative Pb solubility data for different water qualities. Both methods are widely used by utilities in screening corrosion control treatment, and both methods are assumed to provide insights on CCT for Pb without the influence of years of built-up scale. No research has compared the two methods to see if they give similar results for the same water. While these techniques have limitations and do not always represent Pb levels in service lines and premise plumbing, they are valuable for predicting Pb solubility trends under controlled conditions. In this study, Pb coupons immersed in chemically diverse waters provided experimental data on Pb solubility, which was then compared to predictions from two widely used geochemical models, MINEQL+ and LEADSOL. In tests without orthophosphate (PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup>), experimental Pb concentrations increased as pH decreased, consistent with model predictions. Between pH 7.5 and 8.5, Pb levels slightly declined as predicted by the model but were less dependent on dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) than model predictions. However, at pH 8.5–10, Pb concentrations remained constant experimentally, whereas the model predicted significant reductions in Pb. Neither MINEQL+ nor LEADSOL models and experimental data were statistically the same using the built-in constants. Adjusting Log K<sub><i>sp</i></sub> for hydrocerussite allowed the data and models to be statistically the same. In waters with PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup>, high DIC (50 mg/L as C) experimental results matched model predictions. At low DIC (3 mg/L as C), Pb concentrations varied less than modeled, and higher PO<sub>4</sub><sup>3−</sup> doses were needed to reduce Pb levels compared to low-DIC waters. Overall, geochemical modeling and Pb solubility studies provide critical insights into Pb control strategies, and either or both methods can help screen the impact of possible water quality changes on Pb levels. Solubility testing is preferred, as site-specific solubility constants are generally unknown. Using the solubility models' adjustments to Log <i>K</i><sub><i>sp</i></sub> described in this paper is recommended if the site-specific Log <i>K</i><sub><i>sp</i></sub> is unknown.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":101301,"journal":{"name":"AWWA water science","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AWWA water science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/aws2.70020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geochemical solubility modeling is a cost-effective method to estimate equilibrium lead (Pb) concentrations in drinking water under specific environmental conditions. Laboratory Pb-solubility studies (sometimes called coupon studies) are also economical and can generate comparative Pb solubility data for different water qualities. Both methods are widely used by utilities in screening corrosion control treatment, and both methods are assumed to provide insights on CCT for Pb without the influence of years of built-up scale. No research has compared the two methods to see if they give similar results for the same water. While these techniques have limitations and do not always represent Pb levels in service lines and premise plumbing, they are valuable for predicting Pb solubility trends under controlled conditions. In this study, Pb coupons immersed in chemically diverse waters provided experimental data on Pb solubility, which was then compared to predictions from two widely used geochemical models, MINEQL+ and LEADSOL. In tests without orthophosphate (PO43−), experimental Pb concentrations increased as pH decreased, consistent with model predictions. Between pH 7.5 and 8.5, Pb levels slightly declined as predicted by the model but were less dependent on dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) than model predictions. However, at pH 8.5–10, Pb concentrations remained constant experimentally, whereas the model predicted significant reductions in Pb. Neither MINEQL+ nor LEADSOL models and experimental data were statistically the same using the built-in constants. Adjusting Log Ksp for hydrocerussite allowed the data and models to be statistically the same. In waters with PO43−, high DIC (50 mg/L as C) experimental results matched model predictions. At low DIC (3 mg/L as C), Pb concentrations varied less than modeled, and higher PO43− doses were needed to reduce Pb levels compared to low-DIC waters. Overall, geochemical modeling and Pb solubility studies provide critical insights into Pb control strategies, and either or both methods can help screen the impact of possible water quality changes on Pb levels. Solubility testing is preferred, as site-specific solubility constants are generally unknown. Using the solubility models' adjustments to Log Ksp described in this paper is recommended if the site-specific Log Ksp is unknown.

饮用水中的铅溶解度:实验铅溶解度与地球化学模拟预测的比较
地球化学溶解度模型是估算特定环境条件下饮用水中铅平衡浓度的一种经济有效的方法。实验室的铅溶解度研究(有时被称为券研究)也是经济的,可以产生不同水质的比较铅溶解度数据。这两种方法都被广泛应用于公用事业公司的筛选腐蚀控制处理中,并且两种方法都被认为可以在不受多年积垢影响的情况下提供铅的CCT。目前还没有研究对这两种方法进行比较,看看它们是否对同样的水得出相似的结果。虽然这些技术存在局限性,并且并不总是能够代表服务管道和前提管道中的铅水平,但它们对于预测受控条件下的铅溶解度趋势是有价值的。在这项研究中,铅券浸没在化学成分不同的水中,提供了铅溶解度的实验数据,然后将其与两种广泛使用的地球化学模型(MINEQL+和LEADSOL)的预测结果进行了比较。在没有正磷酸盐(PO43−)的试验中,实验铅浓度随着pH的降低而增加,与模型预测一致。pH值在7.5 ~ 8.5之间,Pb水平与模型预测的略有下降,但对溶解无机碳(DIC)的依赖程度低于模型预测。然而,在pH 8.5-10时,Pb浓度在实验中保持不变,而模型预测Pb浓度显著降低。使用内置常数时,MINEQL+和LEADSOL模型和实验数据在统计学上都不相同。调整氢铈矿的测井Ksp使数据和模型在统计上保持一致。在PO43−水体中,高DIC (50 mg/L as C)实验结果与模型预测相符。在低DIC (3 mg/L as C)下,Pb浓度变化小于模型,与低DIC相比,需要更高的PO43 -剂量来降低Pb水平。总体而言,地球化学建模和铅溶解度研究为铅控制策略提供了重要的见解,两种方法中的一种或两种方法都可以帮助筛选可能的水质变化对铅水平的影响。溶解度测试是首选,因为特定位点的溶解度常数通常是未知的。如果特定位点的Log Ksp未知,建议使用溶解度模型对本文中描述的Log Ksp进行调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信