Analysis on the treatment compliance of patients with androgenetic alopecia and its influencing factors: based on the comparison between microneedle therapy and drug therapy

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Xiaojin Wu, Yanli Tang, Ningning Shen, Zhongyun Wang
{"title":"Analysis on the treatment compliance of patients with androgenetic alopecia and its influencing factors: based on the comparison between microneedle therapy and drug therapy","authors":"Xiaojin Wu,&nbsp;Yanli Tang,&nbsp;Ningning Shen,&nbsp;Zhongyun Wang","doi":"10.1007/s00403-025-04211-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study is to analyze treatment adherence and its influencing factors in patients with androgenetic alopecia (AGA). Clinical data from 156 AGA patients, including 89 males and 67 females, were collected. The patients were assigned to either medication group (<i>n</i> = 86) or microneedling group (<i>n</i> = 70). Treatment adherence was assessed using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MGL). Additional data on the patients’ basic information, annual income, education level, side effects, treatment efficacy, disease severity, and mental health (anxiety and depression) were also recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with treatment adherence. The results showed that patients in the microneedling group demonstrated significantly higher treatment adherence compared to those in the medication group (<i>P</i> = 0.032). Within the microneedling group, adherence was significantly associated with age, education level, annual income, treatment duration, and side effects (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.05). Specifically, patients over the age of 30, those with higher incomes, higher educational levels, and those with treatment durations of less than 3 months exhibited better adherence. Additionally, both treatment efficacy improvement and reduced anxiety were strongly correlated with better adherence (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001, <i>P</i> = 0.010). In the medication group, side effects and treatment efficacy were significant factors influencing adherence (<i>P</i> = 0.001, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that, within the microneedling group, patients with at least a middle school education or higher (OR = 0.031, <i>P</i> = 0.035; OR = 0.016, <i>P</i> = 0.041) and those who experienced improved treatment outcomes (OR = 0.002, <i>P</i> = 0.006) were more likely to adhere to treatment. On the other hand, the occurrence of side effects significantly increased the likelihood of non-adherence (OR = 92.358, <i>P</i> = 0.019). Patients with more severe conditions were more likely to adhere to treatment (OR = 0.035, <i>P</i> = 0.038). In the medication group, those with stable or improved treatment outcomes showed better adherence (OR = 0.004, <i>P</i> = 0.010; OR = 0.005, <i>P</i> = 0.012). However, patients with more severe conditions were more likely to discontinue treatment (OR = 204.058, <i>P</i> = 0.029), and depression was identified as a significant risk factor for non-adherence (OR = 586.074, <i>P</i> = 0.004). Microneedling therapy demonstrates significant advantages in improving patient adherence, particularly by reducing side effects, enhancing perceived treatment efficacy, and improving mental health. Treatment efficacy and side effects are key determinants of treatment adherence, with patient age, education level, and income also playing an important role. Future studies should further explore the long-term efficacy and safety of microneedling therapy across different patient populations to optimize treatment protocols and improve adherence.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8203,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Dermatological Research","volume":"317 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Dermatological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00403-025-04211-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study is to analyze treatment adherence and its influencing factors in patients with androgenetic alopecia (AGA). Clinical data from 156 AGA patients, including 89 males and 67 females, were collected. The patients were assigned to either medication group (n = 86) or microneedling group (n = 70). Treatment adherence was assessed using the Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MGL). Additional data on the patients’ basic information, annual income, education level, side effects, treatment efficacy, disease severity, and mental health (anxiety and depression) were also recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify factors associated with treatment adherence. The results showed that patients in the microneedling group demonstrated significantly higher treatment adherence compared to those in the medication group (P = 0.032). Within the microneedling group, adherence was significantly associated with age, education level, annual income, treatment duration, and side effects (P < 0.05). Specifically, patients over the age of 30, those with higher incomes, higher educational levels, and those with treatment durations of less than 3 months exhibited better adherence. Additionally, both treatment efficacy improvement and reduced anxiety were strongly correlated with better adherence (P < 0.001, P = 0.010). In the medication group, side effects and treatment efficacy were significant factors influencing adherence (P = 0.001, P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis revealed that, within the microneedling group, patients with at least a middle school education or higher (OR = 0.031, P = 0.035; OR = 0.016, P = 0.041) and those who experienced improved treatment outcomes (OR = 0.002, P = 0.006) were more likely to adhere to treatment. On the other hand, the occurrence of side effects significantly increased the likelihood of non-adherence (OR = 92.358, P = 0.019). Patients with more severe conditions were more likely to adhere to treatment (OR = 0.035, P = 0.038). In the medication group, those with stable or improved treatment outcomes showed better adherence (OR = 0.004, P = 0.010; OR = 0.005, P = 0.012). However, patients with more severe conditions were more likely to discontinue treatment (OR = 204.058, P = 0.029), and depression was identified as a significant risk factor for non-adherence (OR = 586.074, P = 0.004). Microneedling therapy demonstrates significant advantages in improving patient adherence, particularly by reducing side effects, enhancing perceived treatment efficacy, and improving mental health. Treatment efficacy and side effects are key determinants of treatment adherence, with patient age, education level, and income also playing an important role. Future studies should further explore the long-term efficacy and safety of microneedling therapy across different patient populations to optimize treatment protocols and improve adherence.

雄激素源性脱发患者治疗依从性及影响因素分析:基于微针治疗与药物治疗的比较
本研究的目的是分析雄激素性脱发(AGA)患者的治疗依从性及其影响因素。收集了156例AGA患者的临床资料,其中男性89例,女性67例。将患者分为药物组(n = 86)和微针组(n = 70)。采用Morisky药物依从性量表(MGL)评估治疗依从性。患者的基本信息、年收入、教育程度、副作用、治疗效果、疾病严重程度和心理健康(焦虑和抑郁)等附加数据也被记录下来。单变量和多变量分析用于确定与治疗依从性相关的因素。结果显示,微针组患者的治疗依从性明显高于药物组(P = 0.032)。在微针组中,依从性与年龄、教育程度、年收入、治疗时间和不良反应显著相关(P < 0.05)。具体而言,年龄超过30岁、收入较高、受教育程度较高、治疗时间小于3个月的患者依从性更好。此外,治疗效果的改善和焦虑的减少与更好的依从性密切相关(P < 0.001, P = 0.010)。在给药组,不良反应和治疗效果是影响依从性的显著因素(P = 0.001, P < 0.001)。Logistic回归分析显示,在微针组中,中学及以上文化程度的患者(or = 0.031, P = 0.035;OR = 0.016, P = 0.041),治疗效果改善的患者(OR = 0.002, P = 0.006)更有可能坚持治疗。另一方面,不良反应的发生显著增加了不依从的可能性(OR = 92.358, P = 0.019)。病情越严重的患者越有可能坚持治疗(OR = 0.035, P = 0.038)。在药物组中,治疗结果稳定或改善的患者依从性更好(or = 0.004, P = 0.010;Or = 0.005, p = 0.012)。然而,病情更严重的患者更有可能停止治疗(OR = 204.058, P = 0.029),抑郁症被确定为不遵守治疗的重要危险因素(OR = 586.074, P = 0.004)。微针疗法在提高患者依从性方面具有显著优势,特别是在减少副作用、提高治疗效果和改善心理健康方面。治疗效果和副作用是治疗依从性的关键决定因素,患者的年龄、教育程度和收入也起着重要作用。未来的研究应进一步探索微针治疗在不同患者群体中的长期疗效和安全性,以优化治疗方案并提高依从性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Dermatological Research is a highly rated international journal that publishes original contributions in the field of experimental dermatology, including papers on biochemistry, morphology and immunology of the skin. The journal is among the few not related to dermatological associations or belonging to respective societies which guarantees complete independence. This English-language journal also offers a platform for review articles in areas of interest for dermatologists and for publication of innovative clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信