Mingyu Chang , Yusheng Shen , Xi Zhang , Deng Gao , Xinyang Zhang , Lei-bin Zuo
{"title":"A novel flexible joint mechanical model and application in semi-analytical solution for longitudinal response of tunnel subjected to fault movement","authors":"Mingyu Chang , Yusheng Shen , Xi Zhang , Deng Gao , Xinyang Zhang , Lei-bin Zuo","doi":"10.1016/j.tust.2025.106590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The flexible joints and segmental lining serve as effective seismic measures for tunnel in high-intensity seismic area. However, the tunnel axial deformation at flexible joints has not been fully incorporated into analytical models. This study presents a novel mechanical model for flexible joints that considers tension (compression)-shear- rotation deformations, replacing the traditional shear-rotation springs model. An improved semi-analytical solution has been developed for the longitudinal response of a tunnel featuring a three-way flexible joint mechanical model subjected to fault movement. The nonlinear elastic–plastic foundation spring, the soil-lining tangential interaction, and the axial force of tunnel lining have been considered to improve the applicability and precision of proposed method. The proposed solution is compared with existing models, such as short beams connected by shear and rotation springs, by examining the predictions against numerical simulations. The results indicate that the predictions of the proposed model align much more closely with the outcomes of the numerical simulations than those of the existing models. For the working conditions selected in <span><span>section 4</span></span>, neglecting the tension–compression deformation at flexible joints an 81.8% error in the peak axial force of the tunnel and a 20.2% error in the peak bending moment. The reason is that ignoring the axial deformation of these joints results in a larger calculated axial force on the lining, which subsequently leads to increased bending moment and shear force. Finally, a parameter sensitivity analysis is conducted to investigate the effect of various factors, including flexible joint stiffness, segmental lining length, and the length of the tunnel fortification zone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49414,"journal":{"name":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","volume":"162 ","pages":"Article 106590"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0886779825002287","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The flexible joints and segmental lining serve as effective seismic measures for tunnel in high-intensity seismic area. However, the tunnel axial deformation at flexible joints has not been fully incorporated into analytical models. This study presents a novel mechanical model for flexible joints that considers tension (compression)-shear- rotation deformations, replacing the traditional shear-rotation springs model. An improved semi-analytical solution has been developed for the longitudinal response of a tunnel featuring a three-way flexible joint mechanical model subjected to fault movement. The nonlinear elastic–plastic foundation spring, the soil-lining tangential interaction, and the axial force of tunnel lining have been considered to improve the applicability and precision of proposed method. The proposed solution is compared with existing models, such as short beams connected by shear and rotation springs, by examining the predictions against numerical simulations. The results indicate that the predictions of the proposed model align much more closely with the outcomes of the numerical simulations than those of the existing models. For the working conditions selected in section 4, neglecting the tension–compression deformation at flexible joints an 81.8% error in the peak axial force of the tunnel and a 20.2% error in the peak bending moment. The reason is that ignoring the axial deformation of these joints results in a larger calculated axial force on the lining, which subsequently leads to increased bending moment and shear force. Finally, a parameter sensitivity analysis is conducted to investigate the effect of various factors, including flexible joint stiffness, segmental lining length, and the length of the tunnel fortification zone.
期刊介绍:
Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology is an international journal which publishes authoritative articles encompassing the development of innovative uses of underground space and the results of high quality research into improved, more cost-effective techniques for the planning, geo-investigation, design, construction, operation and maintenance of underground and earth-sheltered structures. The journal provides an effective vehicle for the improved worldwide exchange of information on developments in underground technology - and the experience gained from its use - and is strongly committed to publishing papers on the interdisciplinary aspects of creating, planning, and regulating underground space.