Rachel M Bond , Kendra Ivy , Tre'Cherie Crumbs , Vikram Purewal , Samed Obang , Dan Inder S Sraow
{"title":"Coronary microvascular dysfunction and its role in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction for future prevention and treatment","authors":"Rachel M Bond , Kendra Ivy , Tre'Cherie Crumbs , Vikram Purewal , Samed Obang , Dan Inder S Sraow","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpc.2025.100983","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Ischemic heart disease has long been established as the leading cause of heart failure, typically as a result of hemodynamically significant and obstructive coronary anatomy. Since, the role of dysfunctional coronary microvascular pathophysiologic mechanisms have also been associated with the development of congestive heart failure (CHF), most notably heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) although with limited clinical evidence. Conventional cardiometabolic and behavioral risk factors common to HFpEF such as diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, and chronic kidney disease foster a pro-inflammatory environment conducive to endothelial dysfunction and improper regulation of vasoactive substances. The impaired relaxation and increased vasoconstriction of damaged endothelium gives rise to impaired coronary blood flow and episodes of transient ischemia. Such coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) has its own implication on cardiovascular pathophysiologic mechanisms beyond symptomatic coronary and myocardial ischemia, and thus its own potential prevention goals and treatment targets for patients with HFpEF, where previous management had been limited. As such, we conducted a literature review to address the current landscape of data which links CMD to HFpEF. Furthermore, we considered the implications of biopsychosocial elements such as race, ethnicity, sex, gender, and the social determinants of health as they relate to the disparate health outcomes of those most at risk for CMD and HFpEF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72173,"journal":{"name":"American journal of preventive cardiology","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article 100983"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of preventive cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666667725000558","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ischemic heart disease has long been established as the leading cause of heart failure, typically as a result of hemodynamically significant and obstructive coronary anatomy. Since, the role of dysfunctional coronary microvascular pathophysiologic mechanisms have also been associated with the development of congestive heart failure (CHF), most notably heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) although with limited clinical evidence. Conventional cardiometabolic and behavioral risk factors common to HFpEF such as diabetes mellitus (DM), obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, smoking, and chronic kidney disease foster a pro-inflammatory environment conducive to endothelial dysfunction and improper regulation of vasoactive substances. The impaired relaxation and increased vasoconstriction of damaged endothelium gives rise to impaired coronary blood flow and episodes of transient ischemia. Such coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) has its own implication on cardiovascular pathophysiologic mechanisms beyond symptomatic coronary and myocardial ischemia, and thus its own potential prevention goals and treatment targets for patients with HFpEF, where previous management had been limited. As such, we conducted a literature review to address the current landscape of data which links CMD to HFpEF. Furthermore, we considered the implications of biopsychosocial elements such as race, ethnicity, sex, gender, and the social determinants of health as they relate to the disparate health outcomes of those most at risk for CMD and HFpEF.