{"title":"Age at entry into the Dutch child protection system of children of parents with intellectual disability: A case-control study","authors":"Lianne Bakkum, Carlo Schuengel","doi":"10.1016/j.chipro.2025.100142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>It is well established that children of parents with intellectual disability (ID) are disproportionately involved in child protection. It is important to identify the characteristics of their child protection trajectories.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Children of parents with and without ID were compared on the following characteristics of care: age at entry (weeks), duration of the first intervention (weeks), and the likelihood of having a sibling involved in child protection.</div></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><div>Dutch population-level administrative data were used. Children of parents with ID (cases) were 1:1 matched with controls. The following samples were used: <em>N</em> = 4526 cases in child protection; <em>N</em> = 3200 cases in youth services with child protection; <em>N</em> = 318 cases in youth services without child protection.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Linear and logistic regression models were used.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Children of parents with ID were younger at entry into child protection (<em>B</em> = −176.76, [-187.68; −165.83]), youth services with child protection (<em>B</em> = −152.73, [-165.97; −139.48]), and youth services without child protection (<em>B</em> = −143.10, [-188.72; −97.47]), and they had longer initial child protection interventions (<em>B</em> = 34.68, [25.94; 43.42]). Further, these children were more likely to have a sibling in child protection (OR 1.28, [1.18; 1.40]), youth services with child protection (OR 1.14, [1.02; 1.27]), and youth services without child protection (OR 69.23, [30.84; 198.00]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Children of parents with ID enter child protection and youth services at younger ages and for longer periods, more often accompanied by a sibling. This study highlights the need to investigate contextual factors contributing to this differential treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100237,"journal":{"name":"Child Protection and Practice","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Child Protection and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S295019382500049X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
It is well established that children of parents with intellectual disability (ID) are disproportionately involved in child protection. It is important to identify the characteristics of their child protection trajectories.
Objective
Children of parents with and without ID were compared on the following characteristics of care: age at entry (weeks), duration of the first intervention (weeks), and the likelihood of having a sibling involved in child protection.
Participants and setting
Dutch population-level administrative data were used. Children of parents with ID (cases) were 1:1 matched with controls. The following samples were used: N = 4526 cases in child protection; N = 3200 cases in youth services with child protection; N = 318 cases in youth services without child protection.
Methods
Linear and logistic regression models were used.
Findings
Children of parents with ID were younger at entry into child protection (B = −176.76, [-187.68; −165.83]), youth services with child protection (B = −152.73, [-165.97; −139.48]), and youth services without child protection (B = −143.10, [-188.72; −97.47]), and they had longer initial child protection interventions (B = 34.68, [25.94; 43.42]). Further, these children were more likely to have a sibling in child protection (OR 1.28, [1.18; 1.40]), youth services with child protection (OR 1.14, [1.02; 1.27]), and youth services without child protection (OR 69.23, [30.84; 198.00]).
Conclusion
Children of parents with ID enter child protection and youth services at younger ages and for longer periods, more often accompanied by a sibling. This study highlights the need to investigate contextual factors contributing to this differential treatment.