Assessing decarbonization pathways by weighing carbon mitigation efficiency and risks in China's energy system

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Qi Cui , Xinyu Zhang , Lingyu Yang , Tariq Ali , Yong Yang , Hui Wang , Ruoyu Liu
{"title":"Assessing decarbonization pathways by weighing carbon mitigation efficiency and risks in China's energy system","authors":"Qi Cui ,&nbsp;Xinyu Zhang ,&nbsp;Lingyu Yang ,&nbsp;Tariq Ali ,&nbsp;Yong Yang ,&nbsp;Hui Wang ,&nbsp;Ruoyu Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the world's leading developing nation, China faces significant challenges in balancing carbon reduction with socioeconomic development. Selecting the most effective decarbonization pathway is crucial for achieving China's carbon neutrality target by 2060. However, previous studies primarily focused on carbon mitigation efficiency while overlooking the operational risks associated with energy system transitions. This study couples a CGE model (CHINAGEM) and an energy system model (EnergyPLAN) through a soft-linkage method to comprehensively evaluate the environmental, economic, and energy impacts of various decarbonization pathways in China. By balancing carbon mitigation efficiency against operational risks, the study identifies the most suitable strategies for carbon neutrality. The findings show that increasing electricity generation and greater renewable energy penetration heighten power generation fluctuations, raising operational risks. Although pathways emphasizing renewable energy and end-use electrification can achieve higher carbon mitigation efficiency, they also pose greater operational risks to energy system. Implementing energy efficiency policies can mitigate these risks. Therefore, pathways that effectively balance high mitigation efficiency with lower operational risk are the most suitable for achieving China's carbon neutrality goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 107935"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525001325","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the world's leading developing nation, China faces significant challenges in balancing carbon reduction with socioeconomic development. Selecting the most effective decarbonization pathway is crucial for achieving China's carbon neutrality target by 2060. However, previous studies primarily focused on carbon mitigation efficiency while overlooking the operational risks associated with energy system transitions. This study couples a CGE model (CHINAGEM) and an energy system model (EnergyPLAN) through a soft-linkage method to comprehensively evaluate the environmental, economic, and energy impacts of various decarbonization pathways in China. By balancing carbon mitigation efficiency against operational risks, the study identifies the most suitable strategies for carbon neutrality. The findings show that increasing electricity generation and greater renewable energy penetration heighten power generation fluctuations, raising operational risks. Although pathways emphasizing renewable energy and end-use electrification can achieve higher carbon mitigation efficiency, they also pose greater operational risks to energy system. Implementing energy efficiency policies can mitigate these risks. Therefore, pathways that effectively balance high mitigation efficiency with lower operational risk are the most suitable for achieving China's carbon neutrality goals.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信