Qi Cui , Xinyu Zhang , Lingyu Yang , Tariq Ali , Yong Yang , Hui Wang , Ruoyu Liu
{"title":"Assessing decarbonization pathways by weighing carbon mitigation efficiency and risks in China's energy system","authors":"Qi Cui , Xinyu Zhang , Lingyu Yang , Tariq Ali , Yong Yang , Hui Wang , Ruoyu Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2025.107935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As the world's leading developing nation, China faces significant challenges in balancing carbon reduction with socioeconomic development. Selecting the most effective decarbonization pathway is crucial for achieving China's carbon neutrality target by 2060. However, previous studies primarily focused on carbon mitigation efficiency while overlooking the operational risks associated with energy system transitions. This study couples a CGE model (CHINAGEM) and an energy system model (EnergyPLAN) through a soft-linkage method to comprehensively evaluate the environmental, economic, and energy impacts of various decarbonization pathways in China. By balancing carbon mitigation efficiency against operational risks, the study identifies the most suitable strategies for carbon neutrality. The findings show that increasing electricity generation and greater renewable energy penetration heighten power generation fluctuations, raising operational risks. Although pathways emphasizing renewable energy and end-use electrification can achieve higher carbon mitigation efficiency, they also pose greater operational risks to energy system. Implementing energy efficiency policies can mitigate these risks. Therefore, pathways that effectively balance high mitigation efficiency with lower operational risk are the most suitable for achieving China's carbon neutrality goals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 107935"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925525001325","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As the world's leading developing nation, China faces significant challenges in balancing carbon reduction with socioeconomic development. Selecting the most effective decarbonization pathway is crucial for achieving China's carbon neutrality target by 2060. However, previous studies primarily focused on carbon mitigation efficiency while overlooking the operational risks associated with energy system transitions. This study couples a CGE model (CHINAGEM) and an energy system model (EnergyPLAN) through a soft-linkage method to comprehensively evaluate the environmental, economic, and energy impacts of various decarbonization pathways in China. By balancing carbon mitigation efficiency against operational risks, the study identifies the most suitable strategies for carbon neutrality. The findings show that increasing electricity generation and greater renewable energy penetration heighten power generation fluctuations, raising operational risks. Although pathways emphasizing renewable energy and end-use electrification can achieve higher carbon mitigation efficiency, they also pose greater operational risks to energy system. Implementing energy efficiency policies can mitigate these risks. Therefore, pathways that effectively balance high mitigation efficiency with lower operational risk are the most suitable for achieving China's carbon neutrality goals.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.