{"title":"Global-scale improvement of terrestrial gross primary productivity estimation by integrating optical remote sensing with meteorological data","authors":"Yao Wenyu , Bie Qiang","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study integrates sunlight-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), meteorological factors, and various optical factors (such as LAI, FAPAR, and NDVI) to estimate global-scale gross primary productivity (GPP) using a random forest model (RF). The results show that the random forest model can significantly improve the GPP estimation accuracy, and its overall coefficient of determination (R<sup>2</sup>) is 0.84, the consistency index (IOA) is 0.97, and the root mean square error (RMSE) is only 1.73 g C m<sup>-</sup><sup>2</sup> d<sup>-1</sup>. As the core variable of the model, SIF showed significant contributions in all vegetation types, making up for the limitations of the traditional vegetation index in monitoring the dynamic changes of photosynthesis. The multi-source data fusion method effectively improves the adaptability and robustness of the model to the dynamic changes in GPP in complex ecosystems (such as wetlands and farmland). This study shows that the integration of SIF, meteorological factors and optical factors to construct a multi-source fusion model can not only improve the accuracy and spatiotemporal resolution ability of global-scale GPP estimation, but also provide scientific support for further research on the interaction between ecosystem carbon cycle and climate change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 113429"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study integrates sunlight-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), meteorological factors, and various optical factors (such as LAI, FAPAR, and NDVI) to estimate global-scale gross primary productivity (GPP) using a random forest model (RF). The results show that the random forest model can significantly improve the GPP estimation accuracy, and its overall coefficient of determination (R2) is 0.84, the consistency index (IOA) is 0.97, and the root mean square error (RMSE) is only 1.73 g C m-2 d-1. As the core variable of the model, SIF showed significant contributions in all vegetation types, making up for the limitations of the traditional vegetation index in monitoring the dynamic changes of photosynthesis. The multi-source data fusion method effectively improves the adaptability and robustness of the model to the dynamic changes in GPP in complex ecosystems (such as wetlands and farmland). This study shows that the integration of SIF, meteorological factors and optical factors to construct a multi-source fusion model can not only improve the accuracy and spatiotemporal resolution ability of global-scale GPP estimation, but also provide scientific support for further research on the interaction between ecosystem carbon cycle and climate change.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.