Ashish Sahu , Mahender Singh , Adnan Amin , Monisa Mehboob Malik , Shariq Nazir Qadri , Adnan Abubakr , S.Surya Teja , Shabir Ahmad Dar , Ishtiyaq Ahmad
{"title":"A systematic review on environmental DNA (eDNA) Science: An eco-friendly survey method for conservation and restoration of fragile ecosystems","authors":"Ashish Sahu , Mahender Singh , Adnan Amin , Monisa Mehboob Malik , Shariq Nazir Qadri , Adnan Abubakr , S.Surya Teja , Shabir Ahmad Dar , Ishtiyaq Ahmad","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The conservation and restoration of fragile ecosystems and their genetic resources depends on precisely assessing species diversity and richness, understanding spatiotemporal dynamics, and stock structure analysis. Traditional monitoring methods like visual surveys, physical captures, individual counting, sibling or cryptic species identification, and immature life stages (juveniles) of animals are often intrusive, time-consuming, and provide rough estimates. Environmental DNA (eDNA) has emerged as a novel powerful tool for detecting and quantifying the presence or absence of species through genetic traces left in the environment. It is particularly suited for vulnerable habitats that are sensitive to human disturbance. Herein, we present a temporal analysis from 2008 to 2024, which indicates a consistent increase in eDNA research across fragile ecosystems and their living microbes and microorganisms. Freshwater eDNA studies contribute the highest (33.93%), followed by brackish (26.19%) and marine waters (27.38%). There is a notable focus on invasive (25.48%) and endangered species (22.36%). This systematic review provides an overview of the standard methodological considerations for eDNA science, covering stages from sample collection to advanced bioinformatics processing. It addresses various pipelines, databases, and software tools, essential for accurate data interpretation. The areas for improvement in eDNA science and future directions are also presented that can improve sensitivity, scalability, and reliability. Further, the review highlights important worldwide facilities, organizations, and laboratories leading in eDNA research, along with societies, projects, and programs promoting knowledge exchange.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"173 ","pages":"Article 113441"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25003711","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The conservation and restoration of fragile ecosystems and their genetic resources depends on precisely assessing species diversity and richness, understanding spatiotemporal dynamics, and stock structure analysis. Traditional monitoring methods like visual surveys, physical captures, individual counting, sibling or cryptic species identification, and immature life stages (juveniles) of animals are often intrusive, time-consuming, and provide rough estimates. Environmental DNA (eDNA) has emerged as a novel powerful tool for detecting and quantifying the presence or absence of species through genetic traces left in the environment. It is particularly suited for vulnerable habitats that are sensitive to human disturbance. Herein, we present a temporal analysis from 2008 to 2024, which indicates a consistent increase in eDNA research across fragile ecosystems and their living microbes and microorganisms. Freshwater eDNA studies contribute the highest (33.93%), followed by brackish (26.19%) and marine waters (27.38%). There is a notable focus on invasive (25.48%) and endangered species (22.36%). This systematic review provides an overview of the standard methodological considerations for eDNA science, covering stages from sample collection to advanced bioinformatics processing. It addresses various pipelines, databases, and software tools, essential for accurate data interpretation. The areas for improvement in eDNA science and future directions are also presented that can improve sensitivity, scalability, and reliability. Further, the review highlights important worldwide facilities, organizations, and laboratories leading in eDNA research, along with societies, projects, and programs promoting knowledge exchange.
期刊介绍:
The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published.
• All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices.
• New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use.
• Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources.
• Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators.
• Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs.
• How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes.
• Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators.
• Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.