Transit-based job accessibility of workers with different educational attainments in México City: gaps with public transportation potential needs indices

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Dorian Antonio Bautista-Hernández
{"title":"Transit-based job accessibility of workers with different educational attainments in México City: gaps with public transportation potential needs indices","authors":"Dorian Antonio Bautista-Hernández","doi":"10.1007/s11116-025-10603-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Evaluating spatial access to urban opportunities (such as jobs) has been an emergent approach to studying urban inequities. Unlike in developed countries, where scholars have identified a significant correlation between socioeconomic inequality and residential segregation, Mexico City exhibits relatively high levels of inequality but not extensive segregation in terms of educational outcomes. What is the role of this phenomenon in job access for workers with different educational attainments? This study in the Greater Mexico City area calculates access by public transport using a competitive measure and evaluates the spatial overlapping with other potential socioeconomic groups at a disadvantage. Transit potential needs indices were computed using scaling and exploratory factor analysis. Then, a spatial overlap analysis evaluated where the most significant gaps exist. Results showed that job access by transit decreases with increasing levels of education. This was explained by the location of stationary jobs in specific central corridors for the highly educated and a relative increase in educational outcomes of the population living toward the outskirts (increasing spatial mismatch). The gaps with each transit potential needs index were discussed regarding geographical patterns and potential population groups at a disadvantage. This work contributes to a better understanding of transit disadvantage conditions in the developing context.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10603-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluating spatial access to urban opportunities (such as jobs) has been an emergent approach to studying urban inequities. Unlike in developed countries, where scholars have identified a significant correlation between socioeconomic inequality and residential segregation, Mexico City exhibits relatively high levels of inequality but not extensive segregation in terms of educational outcomes. What is the role of this phenomenon in job access for workers with different educational attainments? This study in the Greater Mexico City area calculates access by public transport using a competitive measure and evaluates the spatial overlapping with other potential socioeconomic groups at a disadvantage. Transit potential needs indices were computed using scaling and exploratory factor analysis. Then, a spatial overlap analysis evaluated where the most significant gaps exist. Results showed that job access by transit decreases with increasing levels of education. This was explained by the location of stationary jobs in specific central corridors for the highly educated and a relative increase in educational outcomes of the population living toward the outskirts (increasing spatial mismatch). The gaps with each transit potential needs index were discussed regarding geographical patterns and potential population groups at a disadvantage. This work contributes to a better understanding of transit disadvantage conditions in the developing context.

墨西哥城不同教育程度工人的公交就业可达性:与公共交通潜在需求指数的差距
评估城市机会(如就业)的空间可及性已成为研究城市不平等的新兴方法。在发达国家,学者们已经发现了社会经济不平等与居住隔离之间的显著相关性。与发达国家不同,墨西哥城在教育成果方面表现出相对较高的不平等水平,但没有广泛的隔离。这种现象在不同教育程度的工人的就业机会中起什么作用?本研究在大墨西哥城地区使用竞争性措施计算公共交通的可达性,并评估与其他潜在的处于不利地位的社会经济群体的空间重叠。利用标度法和探索性因子分析法计算交通潜在需求指数。然后,空间重叠分析评估了最显著的差距存在的地方。结果表明,交通工具的就业机会随着教育水平的提高而降低。这可以解释为,高学历人群的固定工作地点位于特定的中央走廊,而居住在郊区的人口的教育成果相对增加(增加了空间不匹配)。就地理格局和处于不利地位的潜在人口群体讨论了与每个过境潜在需求指数之间的差距。这项工作有助于更好地了解发展中国家的过境不利条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信