Transit-based job accessibility of workers with different educational attainments in México City: gaps with public transportation potential needs indices
{"title":"Transit-based job accessibility of workers with different educational attainments in México City: gaps with public transportation potential needs indices","authors":"Dorian Antonio Bautista-Hernández","doi":"10.1007/s11116-025-10603-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Evaluating spatial access to urban opportunities (such as jobs) has been an emergent approach to studying urban inequities. Unlike in developed countries, where scholars have identified a significant correlation between socioeconomic inequality and residential segregation, Mexico City exhibits relatively high levels of inequality but not extensive segregation in terms of educational outcomes. What is the role of this phenomenon in job access for workers with different educational attainments? This study in the Greater Mexico City area calculates access by public transport using a competitive measure and evaluates the spatial overlapping with other potential socioeconomic groups at a disadvantage. Transit potential needs indices were computed using scaling and exploratory factor analysis. Then, a spatial overlap analysis evaluated where the most significant gaps exist. Results showed that job access by transit decreases with increasing levels of education. This was explained by the location of stationary jobs in specific central corridors for the highly educated and a relative increase in educational outcomes of the population living toward the outskirts (increasing spatial mismatch). The gaps with each transit potential needs index were discussed regarding geographical patterns and potential population groups at a disadvantage. This work contributes to a better understanding of transit disadvantage conditions in the developing context.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10603-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Evaluating spatial access to urban opportunities (such as jobs) has been an emergent approach to studying urban inequities. Unlike in developed countries, where scholars have identified a significant correlation between socioeconomic inequality and residential segregation, Mexico City exhibits relatively high levels of inequality but not extensive segregation in terms of educational outcomes. What is the role of this phenomenon in job access for workers with different educational attainments? This study in the Greater Mexico City area calculates access by public transport using a competitive measure and evaluates the spatial overlapping with other potential socioeconomic groups at a disadvantage. Transit potential needs indices were computed using scaling and exploratory factor analysis. Then, a spatial overlap analysis evaluated where the most significant gaps exist. Results showed that job access by transit decreases with increasing levels of education. This was explained by the location of stationary jobs in specific central corridors for the highly educated and a relative increase in educational outcomes of the population living toward the outskirts (increasing spatial mismatch). The gaps with each transit potential needs index were discussed regarding geographical patterns and potential population groups at a disadvantage. This work contributes to a better understanding of transit disadvantage conditions in the developing context.
期刊介绍:
In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world.
These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.