Identifying main drivers for students and staff members’ choice or to work/study from home or attend university campus and their transport mode choice: a case study in Australia
Camila Balbontin, John D. Nelson, David A. Hensher, Matthew J. Beck
{"title":"Identifying main drivers for students and staff members’ choice or to work/study from home or attend university campus and their transport mode choice: a case study in Australia","authors":"Camila Balbontin, John D. Nelson, David A. Hensher, Matthew J. Beck","doi":"10.1007/s11116-025-10606-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Universities are major trip attractors and generators in large cities, and they have a significant influence on the transport network particularly in high-density areas. The trips to and from university campuses are made by staff, students, and visitors, with an important daily rotation of people (e.g., students who leave early, arrive later, etc.). In this study, we aim to improve our understanding of the trips made to the University of Sydney campuses, one of the largest universities in Australia, through investigation of how individuals (namely, staff and students) choose to study/work from home and their modes of transport used to go to campus on different days of the week. We have collected three sets of data: one in 2022 and two in 2023, using a survey answered by both staff and students. A hybrid logit model including latent variables is estimated to understand the motivations and main drivers to work/study from home and to choose different modes of transport when attending campus. The results indicate that while travel times and costs/fare are important, they are not the primary factors influencing travel behaviour and mode choices. One key factor was whether staff and students worked or studied from home and campus on the same day, with these individuals more likely to use active transport modes, which is also associated with living closer to campus. Students living farther from campus tend to attend more frequently and primarily use public transport. Social connections and a preference for in-person activities are significant motivations that drive different weekly mobility decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-025-10606-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Universities are major trip attractors and generators in large cities, and they have a significant influence on the transport network particularly in high-density areas. The trips to and from university campuses are made by staff, students, and visitors, with an important daily rotation of people (e.g., students who leave early, arrive later, etc.). In this study, we aim to improve our understanding of the trips made to the University of Sydney campuses, one of the largest universities in Australia, through investigation of how individuals (namely, staff and students) choose to study/work from home and their modes of transport used to go to campus on different days of the week. We have collected three sets of data: one in 2022 and two in 2023, using a survey answered by both staff and students. A hybrid logit model including latent variables is estimated to understand the motivations and main drivers to work/study from home and to choose different modes of transport when attending campus. The results indicate that while travel times and costs/fare are important, they are not the primary factors influencing travel behaviour and mode choices. One key factor was whether staff and students worked or studied from home and campus on the same day, with these individuals more likely to use active transport modes, which is also associated with living closer to campus. Students living farther from campus tend to attend more frequently and primarily use public transport. Social connections and a preference for in-person activities are significant motivations that drive different weekly mobility decisions.
期刊介绍:
In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world.
These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.