Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Intensive Antihypertensive Treatment Goals: Brazilian Society of Cardiology (SBC) Recommendation.

Andréa Araujo Brandão, Cibele Isaac Saad Rodrigues, Luiz Aparecido Bortolotto, Leonardo Castro Luna, Bruno Monteiro Barros, Mario Fritsch Toros Neves, Ana Flávia de Souza Moura, Frida Liane Plavnik, Luciano Ferreira Drager, Osni Moreira Filho, Weimar Kunz Sebba Barroso de Souza, Wilson Nadruz
{"title":"Systematic Review of the Effectiveness of Intensive Antihypertensive Treatment Goals: Brazilian Society of Cardiology (SBC) Recommendation.","authors":"Andréa Araujo Brandão, Cibele Isaac Saad Rodrigues, Luiz Aparecido Bortolotto, Leonardo Castro Luna, Bruno Monteiro Barros, Mario Fritsch Toros Neves, Ana Flávia de Souza Moura, Frida Liane Plavnik, Luciano Ferreira Drager, Osni Moreira Filho, Weimar Kunz Sebba Barroso de Souza, Wilson Nadruz","doi":"10.36660/abc.20240761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Strict blood pressure control has been investigated as a strategy to reduce severe cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension. However, there are still doubts about the impact of intensive antihypertensive treatment goals (< 130/80 mmHg) compared to conventional goals (≥ 130/80 mmHg) in preventing myocardial infarction, stroke, mortality, and possible treatment-related adverse effects.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness of intensive antihypertensive treatment goals in reducing critical cardiovascular events compared to usual goals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intensive blood pressure control goals with conventional goals in adults aged 18 years or older. Studies with at least one of the following outcomes were included: mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, progression to stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease, need for dialysis, or kidney transplantation. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to May 2024. Risk of bias assessment was performed by two independent reviewers using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. Synthesis of results was conducted through meta-analysis for the composite outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality. The certainty of scientific evidence and strength of recommendation followed the methods proposed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine RCTs with more than 34,000 participants were included. Intensive treatment was associated with a 13% reduction in cardiovascular events. In the studies with low risk of bias, the reduction was 17%, with high certainty of evidence. Separately, a significant reduction was observed in the outcomes of myocardial infarction and stroke, but not in all-cause mortality. Limited data were found on the progression of kidney disease and the need for dialysis or kidney transplantation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-quality evidence suggests that more intensive antihypertensive treatment goals significantly reduce cardiovascular events. However, the choice of treatment goals should be individualized, considering factors such as age, frailty, individual cardiovascular risk, and the possibility of adverse events. Adherence to treatment is essential to therapeutic success.</p>","PeriodicalId":93887,"journal":{"name":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","volume":"122 3","pages":"e20240761"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36660/abc.20240761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Strict blood pressure control has been investigated as a strategy to reduce severe cardiovascular events in patients with hypertension. However, there are still doubts about the impact of intensive antihypertensive treatment goals (< 130/80 mmHg) compared to conventional goals (≥ 130/80 mmHg) in preventing myocardial infarction, stroke, mortality, and possible treatment-related adverse effects.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of intensive antihypertensive treatment goals in reducing critical cardiovascular events compared to usual goals.

Methods: This systematic review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared intensive blood pressure control goals with conventional goals in adults aged 18 years or older. Studies with at least one of the following outcomes were included: mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, progression to stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease, need for dialysis, or kidney transplantation. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to May 2024. Risk of bias assessment was performed by two independent reviewers using the Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) tool. Synthesis of results was conducted through meta-analysis for the composite outcome of myocardial infarction, stroke, and all-cause mortality. The certainty of scientific evidence and strength of recommendation followed the methods proposed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool.

Results: Nine RCTs with more than 34,000 participants were included. Intensive treatment was associated with a 13% reduction in cardiovascular events. In the studies with low risk of bias, the reduction was 17%, with high certainty of evidence. Separately, a significant reduction was observed in the outcomes of myocardial infarction and stroke, but not in all-cause mortality. Limited data were found on the progression of kidney disease and the need for dialysis or kidney transplantation.

Conclusion: High-quality evidence suggests that more intensive antihypertensive treatment goals significantly reduce cardiovascular events. However, the choice of treatment goals should be individualized, considering factors such as age, frailty, individual cardiovascular risk, and the possibility of adverse events. Adherence to treatment is essential to therapeutic success.

背景:严格控制血压是减少高血压患者严重心血管事件的一种策略。然而,与常规目标(≥ 130/80 mmHg)相比,强化降压治疗目标(< 130/80 mmHg)在预防心肌梗死、中风、死亡率以及可能与治疗相关的不良反应方面的影响仍存在疑问:与常规目标相比,评估强化降压治疗目标在减少严重心血管事件方面的有效性:本系统综述纳入了在 18 岁或以上成年人中比较强化血压控制目标与常规目标的随机对照试验(RCT)。纳入的研究至少包含以下一种结果:死亡率、心肌梗死、中风、慢性肾脏病进展至 4 期或 5 期、需要透析或肾移植。对 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库的检索截止到 2024 年 5 月。由两名独立审稿人使用 Cochrane 协作组织的偏倚风险 2 (RoB 2) 工具进行偏倚风险评估。通过对心肌梗死、中风和全因死亡率的综合结果进行荟萃分析,对结果进行综合。科学证据的确定性和推荐强度遵循推荐评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE)工具提出的方法:结果:共纳入了九项研究性临床试验,参与人数超过 34,000 人。强化治疗可使心血管事件减少 13%。在偏倚风险较低的研究中,心血管事件减少了 17%,证据的确定性较高。另外,还观察到心肌梗死和中风的死亡率明显降低,但全因死亡率却没有明显降低。关于肾脏疾病进展以及透析或肾移植需求的数据有限:高质量的证据表明,更强化的降压治疗目标可显著减少心血管事件的发生。然而,治疗目标的选择应因人而异,考虑到年龄、体弱程度、个人心血管风险以及不良事件发生的可能性等因素。坚持治疗是治疗成功的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信