A Meta-Analysis Study to Define Variations In Murine Long Bone Biomechanical Testing.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Isabella Stewart, Mason Garcia, Namitha Alluri, Maria Buzo, Mario Keko, Ara Nazarian
{"title":"A Meta-Analysis Study to Define Variations In Murine Long Bone Biomechanical Testing.","authors":"Isabella Stewart, Mason Garcia, Namitha Alluri, Maria Buzo, Mario Keko, Ara Nazarian","doi":"10.1115/1.4068318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A systematic literature search and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the variability in biomechanical testing of murine long bones, specifically focused on point-bending tests of mice femora. Due to the lack of standardized protocols for these tests, the assessment quantifies the heterogeneity in reported mechanical properties across existing literature. This study followed PRISMA and STROBE guidelines to search publicly available databases for relevant studies. After title and abstract screening, full-text reviews identified 73 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted from these studies, including stiffness, maximum load, modulus, and ultimate stress values for both 3-point and 4-point bending tests. The data were analyzed through ANOVA and meta-regression to assess variability caused by age, sex, and genetic strain. The reviewers also assessed the quality of the included studies. The meta-analysis revealed significant heterogeneity in reported mechanical properties, with I2 values ranging from 72% to 100% in the 3 point-bending test of pooled genetic strains. This heterogeneity persisted even after accounting for age, sex, and genetic strain differences. The review concludes that nonstandardized testing setups are the likely major source of the observed variability in reported data more than the population characteristics of the mice, highlighting the need for more consistent testing methodologies in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":"1-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068318","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A systematic literature search and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the variability in biomechanical testing of murine long bones, specifically focused on point-bending tests of mice femora. Due to the lack of standardized protocols for these tests, the assessment quantifies the heterogeneity in reported mechanical properties across existing literature. This study followed PRISMA and STROBE guidelines to search publicly available databases for relevant studies. After title and abstract screening, full-text reviews identified 73 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Data were extracted from these studies, including stiffness, maximum load, modulus, and ultimate stress values for both 3-point and 4-point bending tests. The data were analyzed through ANOVA and meta-regression to assess variability caused by age, sex, and genetic strain. The reviewers also assessed the quality of the included studies. The meta-analysis revealed significant heterogeneity in reported mechanical properties, with I2 values ranging from 72% to 100% in the 3 point-bending test of pooled genetic strains. This heterogeneity persisted even after accounting for age, sex, and genetic strain differences. The review concludes that nonstandardized testing setups are the likely major source of the observed variability in reported data more than the population characteristics of the mice, highlighting the need for more consistent testing methodologies in future studies.

界定小鼠长骨生物力学测试差异的元分析研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信