Knowledge and perceptions of regional anesthesia and block room usage among orthopaedic surgeons and nurses.

Porto biomedical journal Pub Date : 2025-04-01 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000288
Ângela Barbosa Mendes, Carlota Carvalho da Silva, Raquel Dias, Catarina S Nunes, Humberto Machado, Neusa Lages
{"title":"Knowledge and perceptions of regional anesthesia and block room usage among orthopaedic surgeons and nurses.","authors":"Ângela Barbosa Mendes, Carlota Carvalho da Silva, Raquel Dias, Catarina S Nunes, Humberto Machado, Neusa Lages","doi":"10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The performance of regional anesthesia (RA) in a block room (BR) may have an impact on the efficiency of the orthopaedics operating room (OR). The aim of this study was to understand the knowledge of healthcare professionals regarding RA and BR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two types of pilot surveys were developed and applied in three independent hospitals. Statistical validation of the survey was performed (Cronbach alpha coefficient and factor analysis), followed by its restructuring. Validated surveys were randomly delivered to orthopaedists and OR nurses from our institution, and a descriptive analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pilot surveys presented a Cronbach alpha of 0.533 and 0.417 in the orthopaedic and OR nurse groups, respectively. Two questions in each survey were removed, increasing the internal consistency of the final restructured surveys. There was a total of 126 validated surveys completed (46 by orthopaedists and 76 by OR nurses). Both groups consider that, compared with general anesthesia, RA is associated with better pain control (95.7%/93.4%), fewer side effects (63%/73.7%), and improved patient satisfaction (84.7%/69.7%). Both groups would choose RA for themselves (89.1%/89.5%) and recommend it to a family member (89.1%/92.1%). Regarding BR, 80.4% of orthopaedists agreed that it is associated with less time wasted in anesthetic preparation, higher productivity (65.2%), and greater efficacy (65.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most orthopaedists and OR nurses recognized the various benefits of RA. Orthopaedists agreed that BR improves outcomes and provides efficiency gains in the OR. Genuine support from the entire OR team can play a critical role in the change.</p>","PeriodicalId":74479,"journal":{"name":"Porto biomedical journal","volume":"10 2","pages":"e288"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957638/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Porto biomedical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pbj.0000000000000288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The performance of regional anesthesia (RA) in a block room (BR) may have an impact on the efficiency of the orthopaedics operating room (OR). The aim of this study was to understand the knowledge of healthcare professionals regarding RA and BR.

Methods: Two types of pilot surveys were developed and applied in three independent hospitals. Statistical validation of the survey was performed (Cronbach alpha coefficient and factor analysis), followed by its restructuring. Validated surveys were randomly delivered to orthopaedists and OR nurses from our institution, and a descriptive analysis was performed.

Results: The pilot surveys presented a Cronbach alpha of 0.533 and 0.417 in the orthopaedic and OR nurse groups, respectively. Two questions in each survey were removed, increasing the internal consistency of the final restructured surveys. There was a total of 126 validated surveys completed (46 by orthopaedists and 76 by OR nurses). Both groups consider that, compared with general anesthesia, RA is associated with better pain control (95.7%/93.4%), fewer side effects (63%/73.7%), and improved patient satisfaction (84.7%/69.7%). Both groups would choose RA for themselves (89.1%/89.5%) and recommend it to a family member (89.1%/92.1%). Regarding BR, 80.4% of orthopaedists agreed that it is associated with less time wasted in anesthetic preparation, higher productivity (65.2%), and greater efficacy (65.2%).

Conclusions: Most orthopaedists and OR nurses recognized the various benefits of RA. Orthopaedists agreed that BR improves outcomes and provides efficiency gains in the OR. Genuine support from the entire OR team can play a critical role in the change.

骨科医生和护士对区域麻醉和阻滞室使用的知识和认知。
背景:阻滞室(BR)区域麻醉(RA)的表现可能会影响骨科手术室(OR)的效率。本研究的目的是了解卫生保健专业人员对RA和BR的认识。方法:在三家独立医院开展两种类型的试点调查。对调查进行统计验证(Cronbach alpha系数和因子分析),然后对其进行重组。随机向本院骨科医生和手术室护士发放有效的调查问卷,并进行描述性分析。结果:试点调查显示骨科组和手术室护士组的Cronbach alpha分别为0.533和0.417。每项调查中的两个问题被删除,增加了最后改组调查的内部一致性。共完成126份有效调查(骨科医生46份,手术室护士76份)。两组均认为,与全麻相比,RA具有更好的疼痛控制(95.7%/93.4%)、更少的副作用(63%/73.7%)和更高的患者满意度(84.7%/69.7%)。两组患者均会自行选择RA(89.1%/89.5%),并向家人推荐RA(89.1%/92.1%)。关于BR, 80.4%的骨科医生认为它与麻醉准备浪费的时间更少、生产率更高(65.2%)和疗效更高(65.2%)有关。结论:大多数骨科医生和手术室护士认识到RA的各种益处。骨科医生一致认为,BR改善了手术结果,提高了手术效率。来自整个OR团队的真诚支持可以在变革中发挥关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信