Knowledge and perceptions of men towards vasectomy among men of reproductive age in Otuke District- Uganda.

IF 2.2 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Anna Grace Auma, Emmanuel Madira, Beth Namukwana, Ronald Izaruku, Amir Kabunga, Tamrat Endale WMichael
{"title":"Knowledge and perceptions of men towards vasectomy among men of reproductive age in Otuke District- Uganda.","authors":"Anna Grace Auma, Emmanuel Madira, Beth Namukwana, Ronald Izaruku, Amir Kabunga, Tamrat Endale WMichael","doi":"10.1186/s40834-025-00341-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess knowledge of and perceptions towards vasectomy as a family planning method among men of reproductive age in rural northern Uganda\".</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study involving 624 participants was conducted. Sociodemographic characteristics, use of vasectomy, number of children, and knowledge of vasectomy were assessed. Perceptions of vasectomy were measured, focusing on cultural, religious, and gender-related aspects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed a predominantly adult, married, and Catholic population with low educational attainment. 2% of participants had used vasectomy as a family planning method, this indicates the right to preference in choosing vasectomy as a family planning method. Approximately half of the participants demonstrated awareness of vasectomy, and negative perceptions were recorded, with 63.5% expressing their opinions. Cultural and religious beliefs, along with concerns about promiscuity, play a significant role in shaping the perceptions. The majority believed in male dominance in family planning decisions, and a considerable portion endorsed sterilization exclusively for women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the low utilization and negative perceptions of vasectomy among men in rural northern Uganda, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to address cultural and religious misconceptions and enhance education on family planning options. Public health campaigns should focus on dispelling misconceptions about vasectomy, particularly addressing cultural and spiritual concerns. Educational programs should target men and their communities, emphasizing the benefits of shared family planning decisions. Further research incorporating qualitative methods could provide a deeper understanding of the cultural aspects influencing vasectomy perceptions in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":93956,"journal":{"name":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","volume":"10 1","pages":"26"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959947/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception and reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-025-00341-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess knowledge of and perceptions towards vasectomy as a family planning method among men of reproductive age in rural northern Uganda".

Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 624 participants was conducted. Sociodemographic characteristics, use of vasectomy, number of children, and knowledge of vasectomy were assessed. Perceptions of vasectomy were measured, focusing on cultural, religious, and gender-related aspects.

Results: The study revealed a predominantly adult, married, and Catholic population with low educational attainment. 2% of participants had used vasectomy as a family planning method, this indicates the right to preference in choosing vasectomy as a family planning method. Approximately half of the participants demonstrated awareness of vasectomy, and negative perceptions were recorded, with 63.5% expressing their opinions. Cultural and religious beliefs, along with concerns about promiscuity, play a significant role in shaping the perceptions. The majority believed in male dominance in family planning decisions, and a considerable portion endorsed sterilization exclusively for women.

Conclusion: This study highlights the low utilization and negative perceptions of vasectomy among men in rural northern Uganda, emphasizing the need for targeted interventions to address cultural and religious misconceptions and enhance education on family planning options. Public health campaigns should focus on dispelling misconceptions about vasectomy, particularly addressing cultural and spiritual concerns. Educational programs should target men and their communities, emphasizing the benefits of shared family planning decisions. Further research incorporating qualitative methods could provide a deeper understanding of the cultural aspects influencing vasectomy perceptions in this population.

乌干达奥图克地区育龄男性对输精管切除术的认识和看法。
目的:本研究旨在评估知识和观念对输精管切除术作为一种计划生育方法在乌干达北部农村育龄男性”。方法:采用横断面研究,624人参与。评估了社会人口学特征、输精管结扎术的使用、儿童数量和输精管结扎术的知识。对输精管结扎术的看法进行了测量,重点是文化、宗教和性别相关方面。结果:研究显示,受教育程度较低的人口主要是成年人、已婚人士和天主教徒。2%的参与者曾将输精管结扎术作为计划生育方法,这表明选择输精管结扎术作为计划生育方法的优先权。大约一半的参与者表现出对输精管结扎术的意识,并记录了负面看法,63.5%的人表达了他们的意见。文化和宗教信仰,以及对滥交的担忧,在形成这种观念方面发挥了重要作用。大多数人认为男性在计划生育决定中占主导地位,相当一部分人赞成只对妇女进行绝育。结论:本研究强调了乌干达北部农村男性对输精管结扎术的低使用率和负面看法,强调需要有针对性的干预措施,以解决文化和宗教误解,并加强计划生育选择的教育。公共卫生运动应侧重于消除对输精管结扎术的误解,特别是解决文化和精神问题。教育项目应该针对男性和他们的社区,强调共同计划生育决策的好处。结合定性方法的进一步研究可以更深入地了解影响这一人群输精管结扎观念的文化方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信