Variability in Learner Performance Using the ACGME Harmonized Milestones During the First Year of Postgraduate Training.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Sally A Santen, Michael S Ryan, Tonya L Fancher, Tyler Carcamo, Sean O Hogan, Laurah Turner, Jeffery J H Cheung, Kate Berg, Moshe Feldman, Eric S Holmboe, Yoon Soo Park
{"title":"Variability in Learner Performance Using the ACGME Harmonized Milestones During the First Year of Postgraduate Training.","authors":"Sally A Santen, Michael S Ryan, Tonya L Fancher, Tyler Carcamo, Sean O Hogan, Laurah Turner, Jeffery J H Cheung, Kate Berg, Moshe Feldman, Eric S Holmboe, Yoon Soo Park","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000006053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Postgraduate medical training in the United States requires formative assessments of learners using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones system. With Milestones 2.0, Harmonized Milestones (HMs) for 4 competency domains (professionalism, communication and interpersonal skills, systems-based practice, and practice-based learning and improvement) across specialties were developed. Performance of postgraduate trainees across specialties and at the transition to residency can be explored with the HMs. This study examined the factors that contribute to the variability in the assessments of postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) learners as measured using Milestones 2.0.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This retrospective study assessed national ACGME HM data from PGY-1 residents at U.S. medical schools in July 2021 and 2022 from the 6 largest specialties: emergency medicine, family medicine, internal medicine, general surgery, psychiatry, and pediatrics. Variance component analyses were conducted using cross-classified random-effects models, accounting for clustering; estimated variance components were used to generate inference on contribution of learner variability due to residency program, medical school, and specialty and make inferences on HM rating practices, including straight-lining.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included 57,132 PGY-1 residents (2,430 programs). Specialty accounted for the largest variance (22%) across HM competency domains. Within specialty, variance components for trainees, residency programs, and medical schools accounted for 22%, 35%, and 2% of total variance, respectively. Straight-lining was found at 6 months for 6,827 of 56,804 PGY-1 residents (12%), with the greatest amount in surgery (2,105 of 5,559 [38%]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found variability in HM performance across 6 specialties due to medical schools, specialty, residency programs, and trainees with limited variability attributed to medical school and learner. Substantial differences across specialties call for the need for clinical educators, researchers, and accreditors to create a shared mental model to bolster the evaluative strength of milestones and prepare residents for the needs of health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000006053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Postgraduate medical training in the United States requires formative assessments of learners using the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) milestones system. With Milestones 2.0, Harmonized Milestones (HMs) for 4 competency domains (professionalism, communication and interpersonal skills, systems-based practice, and practice-based learning and improvement) across specialties were developed. Performance of postgraduate trainees across specialties and at the transition to residency can be explored with the HMs. This study examined the factors that contribute to the variability in the assessments of postgraduate year 1 (PGY-1) learners as measured using Milestones 2.0.

Method: This retrospective study assessed national ACGME HM data from PGY-1 residents at U.S. medical schools in July 2021 and 2022 from the 6 largest specialties: emergency medicine, family medicine, internal medicine, general surgery, psychiatry, and pediatrics. Variance component analyses were conducted using cross-classified random-effects models, accounting for clustering; estimated variance components were used to generate inference on contribution of learner variability due to residency program, medical school, and specialty and make inferences on HM rating practices, including straight-lining.

Results: The sample included 57,132 PGY-1 residents (2,430 programs). Specialty accounted for the largest variance (22%) across HM competency domains. Within specialty, variance components for trainees, residency programs, and medical schools accounted for 22%, 35%, and 2% of total variance, respectively. Straight-lining was found at 6 months for 6,827 of 56,804 PGY-1 residents (12%), with the greatest amount in surgery (2,105 of 5,559 [38%]).

Conclusions: This study found variability in HM performance across 6 specialties due to medical schools, specialty, residency programs, and trainees with limited variability attributed to medical school and learner. Substantial differences across specialties call for the need for clinical educators, researchers, and accreditors to create a shared mental model to bolster the evaluative strength of milestones and prepare residents for the needs of health care.

在研究生培训的第一年,使用ACGME协调里程碑的学习者表现的可变性。
目的:美国的研究生医学培训需要使用研究生医学教育认证委员会(ACGME)里程碑系统对学习者进行形成性评估。随着里程碑2.0,协调里程碑(HMs)的4个能力领域(专业,沟通和人际交往能力,系统为基础的实践,实践为基础的学习和改进)跨专业发展。研究生实习生跨专业的表现以及在向住院医师过渡期间的表现可以与HMs一起探讨。本研究考察了影响研究生一年级(PGY-1)学习者评估可变性的因素,采用里程碑2.0进行测量。方法:本回顾性研究评估了2021年7月和2022年7月美国医学院PGY-1住院医师的全国ACGME HM数据,这些数据来自6个最大的专业:急诊医学、家庭医学、内科、普外科、精神病学和儿科。方差成分分析采用交叉分类随机效应模型,考虑聚类;使用估计方差分量来推断由于住院医师计划、医学院和专业导致的学习者可变性的贡献,并推断HM评级实践,包括直线。结果:样本包括57,132名PGY-1居民(2,430个项目)。专业在HM能力领域中占最大的差异(22%)。在专业中,实习生、住院医师项目和医学院的方差成分分别占总方差的22%、35%和2%。56,804名PGY-1患者中有6,827人(12%)在6个月时发现直线,手术中最多(5,559名患者中有2,105名[38%])。结论:本研究发现,由于医学院、专业、住院医师计划和受训者的不同,6个专业的HM表现存在差异,而医学院和学习者的差异有限。不同专业之间的巨大差异要求临床教育工作者、研究人员和认证人员创建一个共享的心理模型,以加强里程碑的评估强度,并为住院医生的医疗需求做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信