{"title":"Empathy and moral judgment: Systematic review and meta-analysis of ERP studies.","authors":"Youran Zhang, Zhiqiang Yan, Yiyi Wang, Yanjie Su","doi":"10.3758/s13415-025-01287-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the bidirectional relationship between empathy and moral judgment has been extensively investigated, the underlying neural mechanisms remain elusive. The current study examined 19 event-related potential studies to explore the relationship between empathy and moral judgment, including 60 effect sizes. It was found that individuals with higher levels of empathy exhibited a significantly increased amplitude in the N2 component during moral judgment tasks when presented with moral versus immoral scenarios (r<sub>N2</sub> = 0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.04, 0.31], p = 0.010). However, the empathy response toward the target person is also influenced by the moral characteristics of the individual, as evidenced by the enhanced amplitude of P3 and LPP components in the empathic response toward high-moral individuals (r<sub>P3</sub> = 0.30, 95% CI [0.16, 0.42], p < 0.001; r<sub>LPP</sub> = 0.16, 95% CI [0.04, 0.28], p = 0.011). These results suggest that the effect of empathy on moral judgment involves early attention allocation, while the influence of moral judgment on empathy likely involves top-down cognitive regulation. The findings of the present study reveal distinct neural processes between empathy and moral judgment, extending dual-process theories and aiding in developing programs for moral behavior and empathy intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-025-01287-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although the bidirectional relationship between empathy and moral judgment has been extensively investigated, the underlying neural mechanisms remain elusive. The current study examined 19 event-related potential studies to explore the relationship between empathy and moral judgment, including 60 effect sizes. It was found that individuals with higher levels of empathy exhibited a significantly increased amplitude in the N2 component during moral judgment tasks when presented with moral versus immoral scenarios (rN2 = 0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) [0.04, 0.31], p = 0.010). However, the empathy response toward the target person is also influenced by the moral characteristics of the individual, as evidenced by the enhanced amplitude of P3 and LPP components in the empathic response toward high-moral individuals (rP3 = 0.30, 95% CI [0.16, 0.42], p < 0.001; rLPP = 0.16, 95% CI [0.04, 0.28], p = 0.011). These results suggest that the effect of empathy on moral judgment involves early attention allocation, while the influence of moral judgment on empathy likely involves top-down cognitive regulation. The findings of the present study reveal distinct neural processes between empathy and moral judgment, extending dual-process theories and aiding in developing programs for moral behavior and empathy intervention.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.