Quality of intrapartum and newborn care in public healthcare facilities of Wolkite town, Central Ethiopia: facility-based cross-sectional study.

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2025.1444184
Berhanu Semra Mulat, Amare Zewdie, Abebaw Wasie Kasahun, Molla Gashu, Adiam Nega, Tamirat Melis
{"title":"Quality of intrapartum and newborn care in public healthcare facilities of Wolkite town, Central Ethiopia: facility-based cross-sectional study.","authors":"Berhanu Semra Mulat, Amare Zewdie, Abebaw Wasie Kasahun, Molla Gashu, Adiam Nega, Tamirat Melis","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2025.1444184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality of intrapartum and newborn care is increasingly recognized internationally as a critical aspect of the unfinished maternal and newborn health agenda. Although the world has made significant progress in reducing maternal and newborn mortality, there are still far too many preventable and treatable maternal and newborn deaths globally. Poor-quality intrapartum and newborn care along with inadequate access to basic maternal and newborn healthcare services has contributed to high maternal and child mortality in low- and middle-income countries. However, there is not enough evidence describing the status quality of intrapartum and newborn care in Ethiopia, specifically in the study area. Thus, this study aims to assess the quality of intrapartum and newborn care in public health facilities of Wolkite town, Central Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A facility-based cross-sectional study design was conducted from March to April 2023 among five public health facilities, and observation of health service provision was employed among 185 mothers. A consecutive random sampling method was applied. Data were collected through document review, interview, health service provision observation, and health facility audit against the standard checklist. Quality of intrapartum and newborn care was measured using standard intrapartum and newborn care criteria. Thus, good-quality care was considered if the mother and newborn scored 75% or more of the intrapartum criteria during childbirth. Data were entered, coded, and cleaned using EpiData version 4 and exported to SPSS version 25 for analysis. Descriptive summary statistics including proportions, mean, and median were computed to describe study variables. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors significantly associated with the outcome variable. Finally, adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals and <i>p</i>-values <0.05 were considered to declare the statistical significance level of a variable.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The study revealed that the level of good quality of intrapartum and newborn care was 35.1% and 69.7%, respectively. Input quality (AOR = 4.52; 95% CI 1.31, 14.98), health workers with 5 or more years of experience (AOR = 7.23; 95% CI 1.49, 35.84), received on job training (AOR = 5.82; 95% CI 1.91, 13.61), and friendly maternal and newborn care (AOR = 6.89; 95% CI 1.34, 35.62) were significantly associated with quality of intrapartum care.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The quality of intrapartum care is found poor in the study area. Clients are not getting intrapartum care with state-of-the-art knowledge and current clinical best practices. Input quality, the experience of healthcare providers, friendly care, and continuous training were factors associated with the quality of intrapartum care. Improving the availability of essential inputs, enhancing the performance of healthcare providers through training, and continuous objective monitoring of the standard clinical practices are crucial to ensuring the quality of intrapartum care.</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"6 ","pages":"1444184"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959051/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2025.1444184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quality of intrapartum and newborn care is increasingly recognized internationally as a critical aspect of the unfinished maternal and newborn health agenda. Although the world has made significant progress in reducing maternal and newborn mortality, there are still far too many preventable and treatable maternal and newborn deaths globally. Poor-quality intrapartum and newborn care along with inadequate access to basic maternal and newborn healthcare services has contributed to high maternal and child mortality in low- and middle-income countries. However, there is not enough evidence describing the status quality of intrapartum and newborn care in Ethiopia, specifically in the study area. Thus, this study aims to assess the quality of intrapartum and newborn care in public health facilities of Wolkite town, Central Ethiopia.

Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study design was conducted from March to April 2023 among five public health facilities, and observation of health service provision was employed among 185 mothers. A consecutive random sampling method was applied. Data were collected through document review, interview, health service provision observation, and health facility audit against the standard checklist. Quality of intrapartum and newborn care was measured using standard intrapartum and newborn care criteria. Thus, good-quality care was considered if the mother and newborn scored 75% or more of the intrapartum criteria during childbirth. Data were entered, coded, and cleaned using EpiData version 4 and exported to SPSS version 25 for analysis. Descriptive summary statistics including proportions, mean, and median were computed to describe study variables. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors significantly associated with the outcome variable. Finally, adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals and p-values <0.05 were considered to declare the statistical significance level of a variable.

Result: The study revealed that the level of good quality of intrapartum and newborn care was 35.1% and 69.7%, respectively. Input quality (AOR = 4.52; 95% CI 1.31, 14.98), health workers with 5 or more years of experience (AOR = 7.23; 95% CI 1.49, 35.84), received on job training (AOR = 5.82; 95% CI 1.91, 13.61), and friendly maternal and newborn care (AOR = 6.89; 95% CI 1.34, 35.62) were significantly associated with quality of intrapartum care.

Conclusion: The quality of intrapartum care is found poor in the study area. Clients are not getting intrapartum care with state-of-the-art knowledge and current clinical best practices. Input quality, the experience of healthcare providers, friendly care, and continuous training were factors associated with the quality of intrapartum care. Improving the availability of essential inputs, enhancing the performance of healthcare providers through training, and continuous objective monitoring of the standard clinical practices are crucial to ensuring the quality of intrapartum care.

埃塞俄比亚中部Wolkite镇公共医疗机构的产中和新生儿护理质量:基于设施的横断面研究
背景:产中和新生儿护理质量日益被国际公认为未完成的孕产妇和新生儿卫生议程的一个关键方面。尽管世界在降低孕产妇和新生儿死亡率方面取得了重大进展,但全球仍有太多可预防和可治疗的孕产妇和新生儿死亡。分娩和新生儿护理质量差,加上获得基本孕产妇和新生儿保健服务的机会不足,导致中低收入国家孕产妇和儿童死亡率高。然而,没有足够的证据来描述埃塞俄比亚,特别是在研究地区的产时和新生儿护理的现状和质量。因此,本研究旨在评估埃塞俄比亚中部Wolkite镇公共卫生设施的产时和新生儿护理质量。方法:采用基于机构的横断面研究设计,于2023年3月至4月对5家公共卫生机构进行调查,对185名产妇进行卫生服务提供情况观察。采用连续随机抽样方法。通过文件审查、访谈、卫生服务提供观察和卫生设施审计等方式收集数据。采用标准的产时和新生儿护理标准对产时和新生儿护理质量进行测量。因此,如果母亲和新生儿在分娩过程中达到75%或以上的产时标准,则认为护理质量良好。使用EpiData版本4输入、编码和清理数据,并导出到SPSS版本25进行分析。计算描述性汇总统计,包括比例、平均值和中位数来描述研究变量。进行多变量logistic回归分析以确定与结果变量显著相关的因素。结果:本研究显示产中护理质量优等水平为35.1%,新生儿护理质量优等水平为69.7%。输入质量(AOR = 4.52;95% CI 1.31, 14.98),具有5年或5年以上经验的卫生工作者(AOR = 7.23;95% CI 1.49, 35.84),接受过在职培训(AOR = 5.82;95% CI 1.91, 13.61),以及友好的母婴护理(AOR = 6.89;95% CI 1.34, 35.62)与产时护理质量显著相关。结论:研究区产妇产时护理质量较差。客户没有得到最先进的知识和当前临床最佳实践的分娩护理。输入质量、医疗保健提供者的经验、友好的护理和持续的培训是与产中护理质量相关的因素。改善基本投入的可用性,通过培训提高医疗保健提供者的绩效,以及对标准临床实践的持续客观监测,对于确保分娩时护理的质量至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信