"So, This Is Actually Going to Somebody, Right?": Critical Reflections on Participatory Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Peer Support Group for Parents From Historically Marginalized Communities.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Qualitative Health Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1177/10497323251320521
Camille Collins Lovell, Alexandria Richard, Alin Sanchez, Jessamyn Smyth, Aline Gubrium, Elizabeth S Valdez
{"title":"\"So, This Is Actually Going to Somebody, Right?\": Critical Reflections on Participatory Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation of a Peer Support Group for Parents From Historically Marginalized Communities.","authors":"Camille Collins Lovell, Alexandria Richard, Alin Sanchez, Jessamyn Smyth, Aline Gubrium, Elizabeth S Valdez","doi":"10.1177/10497323251320521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Community-engaged, participatory approaches to designing and evaluating public health initiatives center the experiences, perspectives, and knowledge of community members at every stage of the process. A peer support group for racialized and minoritized parents under 25 years of age in the northeastern United States was designed, facilitated, and evaluated with the participation of peer leaders who shared expertise and strategies for navigating complex albeit imperfect bureaucratic systems on which they depend for social services. This paper explores key tensions between the experiences and expectations of peer leaders and the academic researchers involved in the project, and examines the limitations of culturally responsive evaluation to address the structural constraints of the neoliberal university.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":"35 4-5","pages":"554-569"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251320521","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community-engaged, participatory approaches to designing and evaluating public health initiatives center the experiences, perspectives, and knowledge of community members at every stage of the process. A peer support group for racialized and minoritized parents under 25 years of age in the northeastern United States was designed, facilitated, and evaluated with the participation of peer leaders who shared expertise and strategies for navigating complex albeit imperfect bureaucratic systems on which they depend for social services. This paper explores key tensions between the experiences and expectations of peer leaders and the academic researchers involved in the project, and examines the limitations of culturally responsive evaluation to address the structural constraints of the neoliberal university.

“所以,这实际上是给某人的,对吗?”对历史上被边缘化社区的父母的同伴支持小组的参与式规划、实施和评估的批判性反思。
设计和评估公共卫生举措的社区参与、参与性方法以社区成员在这一进程的每个阶段的经验、观点和知识为中心。在美国东北部为25岁以下的种族和少数族裔父母设计了一个同伴支持小组,在同伴领导的参与下进行了设计、促进和评估,他们分享了在复杂而不完善的官僚体系中导航的专业知识和策略,他们依赖于这些体系获得社会服务。本文探讨了同行领导者和参与该项目的学术研究人员的经验和期望之间的关键紧张关系,并考察了文化响应性评估在解决新自由主义大学结构约束方面的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信