Use of self-test to increase HIV testing among men who have sex with men and transgender women-overview of systematic reviews.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Ana Regina Tavares Cairo Azevêdo, Joyce Costa Melgaço Faria, Gustavo Machado Rocha, Cristiane Aparecida Menezes de Pádua
{"title":"Use of self-test to increase HIV testing among men who have sex with men and transgender women-overview of systematic reviews.","authors":"Ana Regina Tavares Cairo Azevêdo, Joyce Costa Melgaço Faria, Gustavo Machado Rocha, Cristiane Aparecida Menezes de Pádua","doi":"10.1080/09540121.2025.2484331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b>Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection is stigmatizing, especially for key populations, who are disproportionately affected by Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs). The stigma and discrimination suffered by these groups are among the main obstacles to HIV prevention, treatment and care, which is why the World Health Organization recommends the use of self-tests to increase HIV testing and achieve the 95-95-95 target by 2030 proposed by the United Nations. We conducted an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, searching for free and indexed terms in nine databases, and using the acronym PICO as an inclusion criterion. Two independent reviewers performed the selection in two stages, and disagreements were resolved by consensus with a third reviewer. Quality analysis was performed using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews, version 2 (AMSTAR 2) tool. Four studies were included, one evaluating men who have sex with men (MSM), one evaluating MSM and another key population, and two evaluating MSM and transgender women (TGW). HIVST was effective in increasing testing frequency and uptake and was considered as good as or better in detecting new HIV infections. However, the presence of more than one critical weakness and multiple non-critical flaws reduced the overall confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48370,"journal":{"name":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2025.2484331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTHuman Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection is stigmatizing, especially for key populations, who are disproportionately affected by Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs). The stigma and discrimination suffered by these groups are among the main obstacles to HIV prevention, treatment and care, which is why the World Health Organization recommends the use of self-tests to increase HIV testing and achieve the 95-95-95 target by 2030 proposed by the United Nations. We conducted an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, searching for free and indexed terms in nine databases, and using the acronym PICO as an inclusion criterion. Two independent reviewers performed the selection in two stages, and disagreements were resolved by consensus with a third reviewer. Quality analysis was performed using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews, version 2 (AMSTAR 2) tool. Four studies were included, one evaluating men who have sex with men (MSM), one evaluating MSM and another key population, and two evaluating MSM and transgender women (TGW). HIVST was effective in increasing testing frequency and uptake and was considered as good as or better in detecting new HIV infections. However, the presence of more than one critical weakness and multiple non-critical flaws reduced the overall confidence.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
172
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信