Use of self-test to increase HIV testing among men who have sex with men and transgender women-overview of systematic reviews.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Ana Regina Tavares Cairo Azevêdo, Joyce Costa Melgaço Faria, Gustavo Machado Rocha, Cristiane Aparecida Menezes de Pádua
{"title":"Use of self-test to increase HIV testing among men who have sex with men and transgender women-overview of systematic reviews.","authors":"Ana Regina Tavares Cairo Azevêdo, Joyce Costa Melgaço Faria, Gustavo Machado Rocha, Cristiane Aparecida Menezes de Pádua","doi":"10.1080/09540121.2025.2484331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>ABSTRACT</b>Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection is stigmatizing, especially for key populations, who are disproportionately affected by Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs). The stigma and discrimination suffered by these groups are among the main obstacles to HIV prevention, treatment and care, which is why the World Health Organization recommends the use of self-tests to increase HIV testing and achieve the 95-95-95 target by 2030 proposed by the United Nations. We conducted an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, searching for free and indexed terms in nine databases, and using the acronym PICO as an inclusion criterion. Two independent reviewers performed the selection in two stages, and disagreements were resolved by consensus with a third reviewer. Quality analysis was performed using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews, version 2 (AMSTAR 2) tool. Four studies were included, one evaluating men who have sex with men (MSM), one evaluating MSM and another key population, and two evaluating MSM and transgender women (TGW). HIVST was effective in increasing testing frequency and uptake and was considered as good as or better in detecting new HIV infections. However, the presence of more than one critical weakness and multiple non-critical flaws reduced the overall confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":48370,"journal":{"name":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aids Care-Psychological and Socio-Medical Aspects of Aids/hiv","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2025.2484331","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTHuman Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infection is stigmatizing, especially for key populations, who are disproportionately affected by Sexually Transmitted Infections (STIs). The stigma and discrimination suffered by these groups are among the main obstacles to HIV prevention, treatment and care, which is why the World Health Organization recommends the use of self-tests to increase HIV testing and achieve the 95-95-95 target by 2030 proposed by the United Nations. We conducted an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, searching for free and indexed terms in nine databases, and using the acronym PICO as an inclusion criterion. Two independent reviewers performed the selection in two stages, and disagreements were resolved by consensus with a third reviewer. Quality analysis was performed using the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews, version 2 (AMSTAR 2) tool. Four studies were included, one evaluating men who have sex with men (MSM), one evaluating MSM and another key population, and two evaluating MSM and transgender women (TGW). HIVST was effective in increasing testing frequency and uptake and was considered as good as or better in detecting new HIV infections. However, the presence of more than one critical weakness and multiple non-critical flaws reduced the overall confidence.

使用自我检测增加男男性行为者和变性妇女的艾滋病毒检测——系统评价综述
人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染是一种耻辱,特别是对于那些不成比例地受到性传播感染(STIs)影响的关键人群。这些群体所遭受的耻辱和歧视是艾滋病毒预防、治疗和护理的主要障碍之一,因此,世界卫生组织建议使用自我检测来增加艾滋病毒检测,并在2030年前实现联合国提出的95-95-95目标。我们进行了系统综述和荟萃分析,在9个数据库中搜索免费和已索引的术语,并使用首字母缩略词PICO作为纳入标准。两名独立的审稿人分两个阶段进行选择,分歧通过与第三名审稿人达成共识来解决。质量分析使用评估系统评价的方法学质量,版本2 (AMSTAR 2)工具进行。包括四项研究,一项评估男男性行为者(MSM),一项评估MSM和另一个关键人群,两项评估MSM和变性女性(TGW)。艾滋病毒检测在增加检测频率和接受度方面是有效的,在检测新的艾滋病毒感染方面被认为是一样好或更好的。然而,一个以上的关键弱点和多个非关键缺陷的存在降低了整体的信心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
172
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信