Comparison of Analgesic Efficiency between Local Infiltration of a Long-Acting Analgesic and Regional Nerve Block among Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 1.9 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI:10.4055/cios23149
Carlo F Fernandez, Byron S Angeles
{"title":"Comparison of Analgesic Efficiency between Local Infiltration of a Long-Acting Analgesic and Regional Nerve Block among Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Carlo F Fernandez, Byron S Angeles","doi":"10.4055/cios23149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is gaining popularity. Different kinds of anesthetic techniques are used; however, regional nerve block (RNB) such as femoral nerve block is considered the most popular choice. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of long-acting local anesthesia infiltration (LAI) versus RNB used to control pain and reduce opioid consumption in patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis using a comprehensive literature search of Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library. All randomized trials comparing the use of infiltration anesthesia versus RNB in patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were included. Methodological quality, risk of bias, and grade of the eligible studies were assessed by 3 independent reviewers. The risk of bias was analyzed using contour-enhanced funnel plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 671 records. Eight studies were included in the systematic review. The study focused on the assessment of immediate, 24-hour, and 48-hour postoperative pain scores and total opioid consumption. There was no significant difference between the use of LAI and RNB with regard to the immediate (<i>p</i> = 0.962), 24-hour (<i>p</i> = 0.156), and 48-hour postoperative pain scores (<i>p</i> = 0.216). The results suggested that LAI could lead to a similar level of opioid consumption as RNB (<i>p</i> = 0.304). However, there was considerable heterogeneity in the opioid consumption outcome due to the different anesthetic techniques used in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regarding postoperative pain control, LAI showed similar clinical effects when compared to the conventional RNB, while maintaining a similar level of opioid consumption postoperatively, decreasing the risk of any adverse effects of morphine. In summary, LAI offers a simpler method of achieving pain relief without the motor weakness associated with RNB. It also allows surgeons to perform ACL reconstruction in institutions without specialized anesthesia for RNB.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"17 2","pages":"228-237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios23149","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is gaining popularity. Different kinds of anesthetic techniques are used; however, regional nerve block (RNB) such as femoral nerve block is considered the most popular choice. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of long-acting local anesthesia infiltration (LAI) versus RNB used to control pain and reduce opioid consumption in patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.

Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis using a comprehensive literature search of Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library. All randomized trials comparing the use of infiltration anesthesia versus RNB in patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were included. Methodological quality, risk of bias, and grade of the eligible studies were assessed by 3 independent reviewers. The risk of bias was analyzed using contour-enhanced funnel plots.

Results: The search yielded 671 records. Eight studies were included in the systematic review. The study focused on the assessment of immediate, 24-hour, and 48-hour postoperative pain scores and total opioid consumption. There was no significant difference between the use of LAI and RNB with regard to the immediate (p = 0.962), 24-hour (p = 0.156), and 48-hour postoperative pain scores (p = 0.216). The results suggested that LAI could lead to a similar level of opioid consumption as RNB (p = 0.304). However, there was considerable heterogeneity in the opioid consumption outcome due to the different anesthetic techniques used in the included studies.

Conclusions: Regarding postoperative pain control, LAI showed similar clinical effects when compared to the conventional RNB, while maintaining a similar level of opioid consumption postoperatively, decreasing the risk of any adverse effects of morphine. In summary, LAI offers a simpler method of achieving pain relief without the motor weakness associated with RNB. It also allows surgeons to perform ACL reconstruction in institutions without specialized anesthesia for RNB.

关节镜下前交叉韧带重建患者局部浸润长效镇痛药与局部神经阻滞镇痛效果比较:随机对照试验荟萃分析
背景:关节镜下前交叉韧带(ACL)重建越来越受欢迎。使用不同种类的麻醉技术;然而,局部神经阻滞(RNB)如股神经阻滞被认为是最受欢迎的选择。本研究的目的是比较长效局麻浸润(LAI)与RNB在关节镜下ACL重建患者控制疼痛和减少阿片类药物消耗方面的有效性。方法:我们对谷歌Scholar、PubMed、Medline和Cochrane Library进行了综合文献检索,并进行了meta分析。所有比较浸润麻醉与RNB在关节镜下ACL重建患者中的应用的随机试验均被纳入。入选研究的方法学质量、偏倚风险和分级由3位独立审稿人进行评估。采用轮廓增强漏斗图分析偏倚风险。结果:搜索得到671条记录。系统评价纳入了8项研究。该研究的重点是评估即刻、24小时和48小时术后疼痛评分和阿片类药物总消耗量。术后即刻疼痛评分(p = 0.962)、24小时疼痛评分(p = 0.156)、48小时疼痛评分(p = 0.216), LAI与RNB的使用差异无统计学意义。结果表明,LAI可导致与人民币相似的阿片类药物消费水平(p = 0.304)。然而,由于纳入研究中使用的麻醉技术不同,阿片类药物消费结果存在相当大的异质性。结论:在术后疼痛控制方面,LAI与常规RNB相比具有相似的临床效果,同时术后阿片类药物的消耗保持在相似水平,降低了吗啡不良反应的风险。综上所述,LAI提供了一种更简单的方法来缓解疼痛,而不会出现与RNB相关的运动无力。它还允许外科医生在没有专门麻醉的情况下在机构进行前交叉韧带重建。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信