Comparison of Analgesic Efficiency between Local Infiltration of a Long-Acting Analgesic and Regional Nerve Block among Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 1.9 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-14 DOI:10.4055/cios23149
Carlo F Fernandez, Byron S Angeles
{"title":"Comparison of Analgesic Efficiency between Local Infiltration of a Long-Acting Analgesic and Regional Nerve Block among Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Carlo F Fernandez, Byron S Angeles","doi":"10.4055/cios23149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is gaining popularity. Different kinds of anesthetic techniques are used; however, regional nerve block (RNB) such as femoral nerve block is considered the most popular choice. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of long-acting local anesthesia infiltration (LAI) versus RNB used to control pain and reduce opioid consumption in patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a meta-analysis using a comprehensive literature search of Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library. All randomized trials comparing the use of infiltration anesthesia versus RNB in patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were included. Methodological quality, risk of bias, and grade of the eligible studies were assessed by 3 independent reviewers. The risk of bias was analyzed using contour-enhanced funnel plots.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 671 records. Eight studies were included in the systematic review. The study focused on the assessment of immediate, 24-hour, and 48-hour postoperative pain scores and total opioid consumption. There was no significant difference between the use of LAI and RNB with regard to the immediate (<i>p</i> = 0.962), 24-hour (<i>p</i> = 0.156), and 48-hour postoperative pain scores (<i>p</i> = 0.216). The results suggested that LAI could lead to a similar level of opioid consumption as RNB (<i>p</i> = 0.304). However, there was considerable heterogeneity in the opioid consumption outcome due to the different anesthetic techniques used in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Regarding postoperative pain control, LAI showed similar clinical effects when compared to the conventional RNB, while maintaining a similar level of opioid consumption postoperatively, decreasing the risk of any adverse effects of morphine. In summary, LAI offers a simpler method of achieving pain relief without the motor weakness associated with RNB. It also allows surgeons to perform ACL reconstruction in institutions without specialized anesthesia for RNB.</p>","PeriodicalId":47648,"journal":{"name":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","volume":"17 2","pages":"228-237"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11957829/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4055/cios23149","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is gaining popularity. Different kinds of anesthetic techniques are used; however, regional nerve block (RNB) such as femoral nerve block is considered the most popular choice. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of long-acting local anesthesia infiltration (LAI) versus RNB used to control pain and reduce opioid consumption in patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction.

Methods: We conducted a meta-analysis using a comprehensive literature search of Google Scholar, PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane Library. All randomized trials comparing the use of infiltration anesthesia versus RNB in patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were included. Methodological quality, risk of bias, and grade of the eligible studies were assessed by 3 independent reviewers. The risk of bias was analyzed using contour-enhanced funnel plots.

Results: The search yielded 671 records. Eight studies were included in the systematic review. The study focused on the assessment of immediate, 24-hour, and 48-hour postoperative pain scores and total opioid consumption. There was no significant difference between the use of LAI and RNB with regard to the immediate (p = 0.962), 24-hour (p = 0.156), and 48-hour postoperative pain scores (p = 0.216). The results suggested that LAI could lead to a similar level of opioid consumption as RNB (p = 0.304). However, there was considerable heterogeneity in the opioid consumption outcome due to the different anesthetic techniques used in the included studies.

Conclusions: Regarding postoperative pain control, LAI showed similar clinical effects when compared to the conventional RNB, while maintaining a similar level of opioid consumption postoperatively, decreasing the risk of any adverse effects of morphine. In summary, LAI offers a simpler method of achieving pain relief without the motor weakness associated with RNB. It also allows surgeons to perform ACL reconstruction in institutions without specialized anesthesia for RNB.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信