Preliminary Development and Validation of the Inventory of Goals and Anti-Goals.

IF 2 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Giuseppe Femia, Isabella Federico, Guyonne Rogier, Francesca D'Olimpio, Francesco Mancini, Andrea Gragnani
{"title":"Preliminary Development and Validation of the Inventory of Goals and Anti-Goals.","authors":"Giuseppe Femia, Isabella Federico, Guyonne Rogier, Francesca D'Olimpio, Francesco Mancini, Andrea Gragnani","doi":"10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The clinical and empirical investigation of the role of investment in goals and anti-goals is limited by the lack of an easy-to-use tool. This is critical, as psychopathology, and specifically pathological personality, is characterized by an overinvestment in goals and anti-goals, rigidity in these investments and, consequently, by a poor existential plan that generates suffering and resistance to change. To develop a preliminary version of a self-report questionnaire measuring investment levels in goals and anti-goals, described as core features of the most common psychopathological conditions. To test the factorial structure of the tool and examine preliminary data on its construct validity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The Inventory of Goals and Anti-Goals (IGAG) was developed. A total of 572 participants (Mage= 33.05 years; SD= 10.01; 61.62 % females), including community participants (n =424) and patients (n =148), was asked to complete a battery of questionnaires including the IGAG, the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 and the Symptom-Checklist-90-Revised. Exploratory factor analysis, Mann-Whitney U tests and correlations were computed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analyses identified an eight-factor structure and significant differences between groups on several factors. IGAG scores were largely significantly and positively correlated with the PID-5 and SCL-90-R in the expected directions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The IGAG appears to be a promising instrument for both research and clinical practice. Results suggest a strong relationship between overinvestment in goals and anti-goals and psychopathology. Several limitations necessitate future modifications of its content and additional efforts for validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46700,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","volume":"22 1","pages":"99-108"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11956880/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20250108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The clinical and empirical investigation of the role of investment in goals and anti-goals is limited by the lack of an easy-to-use tool. This is critical, as psychopathology, and specifically pathological personality, is characterized by an overinvestment in goals and anti-goals, rigidity in these investments and, consequently, by a poor existential plan that generates suffering and resistance to change. To develop a preliminary version of a self-report questionnaire measuring investment levels in goals and anti-goals, described as core features of the most common psychopathological conditions. To test the factorial structure of the tool and examine preliminary data on its construct validity.

Method: The Inventory of Goals and Anti-Goals (IGAG) was developed. A total of 572 participants (Mage= 33.05 years; SD= 10.01; 61.62 % females), including community participants (n =424) and patients (n =148), was asked to complete a battery of questionnaires including the IGAG, the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 and the Symptom-Checklist-90-Revised. Exploratory factor analysis, Mann-Whitney U tests and correlations were computed.

Results: Analyses identified an eight-factor structure and significant differences between groups on several factors. IGAG scores were largely significantly and positively correlated with the PID-5 and SCL-90-R in the expected directions.

Conclusions: The IGAG appears to be a promising instrument for both research and clinical practice. Results suggest a strong relationship between overinvestment in goals and anti-goals and psychopathology. Several limitations necessitate future modifications of its content and additional efforts for validation.

目标与反目标清单的初步开发与验证。
目的:由于缺乏一种易于使用的工具,对投资在目标和反目标中的作用的临床和实证研究受到限制。这是至关重要的,因为精神病理学,特别是病态人格,其特征是对目标和反目标的过度投资,这些投资的僵化,结果是一个糟糕的存在计划,产生痛苦和对改变的抵制。开发自我报告问卷的初步版本,测量目标和反目标的投资水平,描述为最常见的精神病理状况的核心特征。检验该工具的因子结构,并检验其结构效度的初步数据。方法:编制目标与反目标量表(IGAG)。共572名参与者(年龄= 33.05岁;SD = 10.01;61.62%(女性),包括社区参与者(n =424)和患者(n =148),被要求完成一系列问卷调查,包括IGAG、DSM-5人格量表和症状检查表-90-修订版。进行探索性因子分析、Mann-Whitney U检验和相关性计算。结果:分析确定了一个八因素结构,组间在几个因素上有显著差异。IGAG得分与PID-5和SCL-90-R呈显著正相关。结论:IGAG在研究和临床实践中都是一个很有前途的工具。结果表明,过度投资目标和反目标与精神病理之间存在密切关系。由于一些限制,未来需要对其内容进行修改,并进行额外的验证工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychiatry
Clinical Neuropsychiatry CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
1.60%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信