Concurrent Depression Management in Patients with Opioid Use Disorder Undergoing Buprenorphine Therapy: Association with Buprenorphine Discontinuation.
Vaishnavi Tata, Tyler J Varisco, Dipali V Rinker, Susan Abughosh, Clay Rhodes, J Douglas Thornton
{"title":"Concurrent Depression Management in Patients with Opioid Use Disorder Undergoing Buprenorphine Therapy: Association with Buprenorphine Discontinuation.","authors":"Vaishnavi Tata, Tyler J Varisco, Dipali V Rinker, Susan Abughosh, Clay Rhodes, J Douglas Thornton","doi":"10.1080/15504263.2025.2474949","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> The relationship between concurrent depression and Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) treatment outcomes remains incompletely understood. Prior studies found mixed results regarding the impact of psychiatric comorbidities on retention to medications for OUD. This study aims to evaluate how the receipt of pharmacotherapy for depression impacts retention to buprenorphine therapy among patients with OUD and concurrent depression. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Humana Healthcare Research claims database (2014-2020) on a sample of adult patients who initiated buprenorphine for OUD between January 2015, and September 2019. Patients were required to have a 180-day buprenorphine-free period pre-index. Patients with concurrent depression were identified via diagnosis in a medical claim within the baseline period. Antidepressant use was defined as cumulative exposure from the start of the baseline through the end of the 180-day follow-up period. The primary outcome was time to buprenorphine discontinuation, defined as a gap of more than 30 days from the day of last supply. Cox Proportional Hazards regression was used to estimate the association between antidepressant receipt and buprenorphine discontinuation. Sensitivity analyses on specific classes of antidepressants were also conducted. <b>Results:</b> The final analytical cohort included 1,973 patients with OUD and concurrent depression. Of these, 235 (11.91%) discontinued buprenorphine during the follow-up period, with a mean time to discontinuation of 97.92 (±68.64) days. Survival analysis revealed that patients who received antidepressants had a significantly lower hazard of discontinuation [aHR (95% CI): 0.995 (0.994, 0.996); <i>p <</i> .0001]. Initiated dose of buprenorphine also had a significant effect on the hazard of discontinuation [0.976 (0.956, 0.997); <i>p =</i> .0270]. <b>Conclusions:</b> Our findings support the notion that continuation of antidepressants when initiating buprenorphine therapy for OUD positively influences buprenorphine retention among patients with OUD and concurrent depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":46571,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dual Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15504263.2025.2474949","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The relationship between concurrent depression and Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) treatment outcomes remains incompletely understood. Prior studies found mixed results regarding the impact of psychiatric comorbidities on retention to medications for OUD. This study aims to evaluate how the receipt of pharmacotherapy for depression impacts retention to buprenorphine therapy among patients with OUD and concurrent depression. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Humana Healthcare Research claims database (2014-2020) on a sample of adult patients who initiated buprenorphine for OUD between January 2015, and September 2019. Patients were required to have a 180-day buprenorphine-free period pre-index. Patients with concurrent depression were identified via diagnosis in a medical claim within the baseline period. Antidepressant use was defined as cumulative exposure from the start of the baseline through the end of the 180-day follow-up period. The primary outcome was time to buprenorphine discontinuation, defined as a gap of more than 30 days from the day of last supply. Cox Proportional Hazards regression was used to estimate the association between antidepressant receipt and buprenorphine discontinuation. Sensitivity analyses on specific classes of antidepressants were also conducted. Results: The final analytical cohort included 1,973 patients with OUD and concurrent depression. Of these, 235 (11.91%) discontinued buprenorphine during the follow-up period, with a mean time to discontinuation of 97.92 (±68.64) days. Survival analysis revealed that patients who received antidepressants had a significantly lower hazard of discontinuation [aHR (95% CI): 0.995 (0.994, 0.996); p < .0001]. Initiated dose of buprenorphine also had a significant effect on the hazard of discontinuation [0.976 (0.956, 0.997); p = .0270]. Conclusions: Our findings support the notion that continuation of antidepressants when initiating buprenorphine therapy for OUD positively influences buprenorphine retention among patients with OUD and concurrent depression.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Dual Diagnosis is a quarterly, international publication that focuses on the full spectrum of complexities regarding dual diagnosis. The co-occurrence of mental health and substance use disorders, or “dual diagnosis,” is one of the quintessential issues in behavioral health. Why do such high rates of co-occurrence exist? What does it tell us about risk profiles? How do these linked disorders affect people, their families, and the communities in which they live? What are the natural paths to recovery? What specific treatments are most helpful and how can new ones be developed? How can we enhance the implementation of evidence-based practices at clinical, administrative, and policy levels? How can we help clients to learn active recovery skills and adopt needed supports, clinicians to master new interventions, programs to implement effective services, and communities to foster healthy adjustment? The Journal addresses each of these perplexing challenges.