[Qualitative Systematic Review Research Method: A Meta-Ethnographic Synthesis].

Q3 Nursing
Wei-Ting Lai, Li-Min Wu, Min-Tao Hsu
{"title":"[Qualitative Systematic Review Research Method: A Meta-Ethnographic Synthesis].","authors":"Wei-Ting Lai, Li-Min Wu, Min-Tao Hsu","doi":"10.6224/JN.202504_72(2).12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this paper, meta-ethnographic synthesis is introduced as a qualitative systematic review method to provide researchers with a comprehensive theoretical foundation of this method and an understanding of its analytical steps. Grounded in interpretivism, this method incorporates Geertz's concept of \"thick description\" and Turner's concept of \"translation\" and emphasizes the exploration of meaning within cultural contexts. By continuously comparing and synthesizing similar and divergent concepts and metaphors across multiple qualitative studies, this approach highlights the cultural context and interpretive significance of integrated phenomena, thereby constructing higher-order interpretive frameworks. Moreover, comprehensive explanations are given of the seven phases proposed by Noblit and Hare (1988), i.e., getting started, determining relevant content for the initial inquiry, reading the studies, establishing how the studies are related, translating the studies into each other, synthesizing the translations, and presenting the final synthesis. Furthermore, potential applications of meta-ethnographic synthesis in the field of healthcare are described, including synthesizing multicultural caregiving experiences to elucidate the lived worlds of patients and caregivers. Meta-ethnographic synthesis not only fosters deeper cultural insights but also provides concrete qualitative evidence to inform policy-making and facilitates the translation and exchange of knowledge between academia and clinical practice. The insights provided in this paper highlight that meta-ethnographic synthesis, through its comparison and interpretation, offers unique insights into human experience and cultural diversity, enriching qualitative research with new perspectives and theoretical contributions.</p>","PeriodicalId":35672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing","volume":"72 2","pages":"96-106"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6224/JN.202504_72(2).12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, meta-ethnographic synthesis is introduced as a qualitative systematic review method to provide researchers with a comprehensive theoretical foundation of this method and an understanding of its analytical steps. Grounded in interpretivism, this method incorporates Geertz's concept of "thick description" and Turner's concept of "translation" and emphasizes the exploration of meaning within cultural contexts. By continuously comparing and synthesizing similar and divergent concepts and metaphors across multiple qualitative studies, this approach highlights the cultural context and interpretive significance of integrated phenomena, thereby constructing higher-order interpretive frameworks. Moreover, comprehensive explanations are given of the seven phases proposed by Noblit and Hare (1988), i.e., getting started, determining relevant content for the initial inquiry, reading the studies, establishing how the studies are related, translating the studies into each other, synthesizing the translations, and presenting the final synthesis. Furthermore, potential applications of meta-ethnographic synthesis in the field of healthcare are described, including synthesizing multicultural caregiving experiences to elucidate the lived worlds of patients and caregivers. Meta-ethnographic synthesis not only fosters deeper cultural insights but also provides concrete qualitative evidence to inform policy-making and facilitates the translation and exchange of knowledge between academia and clinical practice. The insights provided in this paper highlight that meta-ethnographic synthesis, through its comparison and interpretation, offers unique insights into human experience and cultural diversity, enriching qualitative research with new perspectives and theoretical contributions.

定性系统评价研究方法:一种元民族志综合。
本文将元民族志综合作为一种定性的系统综述方法进行介绍,为研究人员提供该方法的全面理论基础和分析步骤。这种方法以解释主义为基础,融合了格尔茨的“厚描述”概念和特纳的“翻译”概念,强调在文化语境中探索意义。该方法通过对多个定性研究中相似或不同的概念和隐喻的不断比较和综合,突出了综合现象的文化语境和解释意义,从而构建了更高层次的解释框架。此外,对Noblit和Hare(1988)提出的七个阶段进行了全面的解释,即开始,确定初始调查的相关内容,阅读研究,建立研究之间的关系,将研究相互翻译,综合翻译,并提出最终的综合。此外,描述了元民族志综合在医疗保健领域的潜在应用,包括综合多元文化护理经验来阐明患者和护理者的生活世界。元民族志综合不仅促进了更深层次的文化见解,而且为政策制定提供了具体的定性证据,并促进了学术界和临床实践之间的知识翻译和交流。本文提供的见解强调,元民族志综合通过其比较和解释,为人类经验和文化多样性提供了独特的见解,以新的视角和理论贡献丰富了定性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Nursing
Journal of Nursing Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信