Women's satisfaction with breast reconstruction after mastectomy and a survey on the decision process for type of reconstructive surgery.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ingrid Jelinek, Rupert Koller, Michael Kundi
{"title":"Women's satisfaction with breast reconstruction after mastectomy and a survey on the decision process for type of reconstructive surgery.","authors":"Ingrid Jelinek, Rupert Koller, Michael Kundi","doi":"10.1007/s00508-025-02526-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast reconstruction is an option for women after breast cancer surgery to improve the quality of life. While data about satisfaction after reconstruction are available, little is known about the decision process and about factors shaping this process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 100 selected women, 72 women between 30 and 65 years of age (median 50.3 years, interquartile range 44-57 years) with breast reconstruction conducted in a single center in Vienna (Austria) consented to take part in this study. The role of family, social environment and healthcare providers during decision making, body image, thoughts about hospital stay and potential complications were assessed by a questionnaire. The decision for autologous tissue versus silicone implants was analyzed by structural equation modelling.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 69% of the women chose autologous tissue either alone or in combination with a silicone prosthesis. Visual appearance was the most important reason (86%) for choosing reconstruction. Thoughts about the stay in hospital and possible complications were important for the mediating role of healthcare providers in deciding on the type of reconstruction. If women had no concerns about complications they made the choice on their own and favoring autologous tissue reconstruction. In contrast, if such concerns existed women tended to seek help from healthcare providers and tended to choose silicone implants.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Counselling of women after breast cancer surgery and during decision making for breast reconstruction should include an esthetic outcome but also possible complications and related length of hospital stay.</p>","PeriodicalId":23861,"journal":{"name":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-025-02526-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Breast reconstruction is an option for women after breast cancer surgery to improve the quality of life. While data about satisfaction after reconstruction are available, little is known about the decision process and about factors shaping this process.

Methods: From 100 selected women, 72 women between 30 and 65 years of age (median 50.3 years, interquartile range 44-57 years) with breast reconstruction conducted in a single center in Vienna (Austria) consented to take part in this study. The role of family, social environment and healthcare providers during decision making, body image, thoughts about hospital stay and potential complications were assessed by a questionnaire. The decision for autologous tissue versus silicone implants was analyzed by structural equation modelling.

Results: Overall, 69% of the women chose autologous tissue either alone or in combination with a silicone prosthesis. Visual appearance was the most important reason (86%) for choosing reconstruction. Thoughts about the stay in hospital and possible complications were important for the mediating role of healthcare providers in deciding on the type of reconstruction. If women had no concerns about complications they made the choice on their own and favoring autologous tissue reconstruction. In contrast, if such concerns existed women tended to seek help from healthcare providers and tended to choose silicone implants.

Conclusion: Counselling of women after breast cancer surgery and during decision making for breast reconstruction should include an esthetic outcome but also possible complications and related length of hospital stay.

女性对乳房切除术后乳房重建的满意度及重建手术方式选择过程的调查。
背景:乳房重建术是乳腺癌术后妇女改善生活质量的一种选择。虽然关于重建后满意度的数据是可用的,但对决策过程和影响这一过程的因素知之甚少。方法:从100名选定的妇女中,有72名30至65岁(中位数50.3岁,四分位数范围44-57岁)的妇女在维也纳(奥地利)的一个中心接受乳房重建,同意参加本研究。通过问卷调查评估家庭、社会环境和医疗保健提供者在决策、身体形象、住院和潜在并发症方面的作用。采用结构方程模型分析了自体组织与硅胶植入的选择。结果:总体而言,69%的女性选择单独使用自体组织或与硅胶假体联合使用。选择重建的最重要原因是外观(86%)。考虑住院时间和可能的并发症对医疗保健提供者在决定重建类型时的调解作用很重要。如果女性不担心并发症,她们会自行选择自体组织重建。相反,如果存在这样的担忧,女性倾向于向医疗保健提供者寻求帮助,并倾向于选择硅胶植入物。结论:乳腺癌手术后妇女的咨询和乳房重建的决策应包括美学结果,但可能的并发症和相关的住院时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is an international scientific medical journal covering the entire spectrum of clinical medicine and related areas such as ethics in medicine, public health and the history of medicine. In addition to original articles, the Journal features editorials and leading articles on newly emerging topics, review articles, case reports and a broad range of special articles. Experimental material will be considered for publication if it is directly relevant to clinical medicine. The number of international contributions has been steadily increasing. Consequently, the international reputation of the journal has grown in the past several years. Founded in 1888, the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is certainly one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world and takes pride in having been the first publisher of landmarks in medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信