The therapeutic potential of exercise in post-traumatic stress disorder and its underlying mechanisms: A living systematic review of human and non-human studies.

Q1 Medicine
Wellcome Open Research Pub Date : 2025-04-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23033.2
Simonne Wright, Virginia Chiocchia, Olufisayo Elugbadebo, Ouma Simple, Toshi A Furukawa, Claire Friedrich, Charlotte Austin, Hossein Dehdarirad, David Gilbert, Jaycee Kennett, Edoardo G Ostinelli, Jennifer Potts, Fiona Ramage, Emily Sena, Spyridon Siafis, Claire Stansfield, James Thomas, Francesca Tinsdeall, Thomy Tonia, Malcolm Macleod, Andrea Cipriani, Georgia Salanti, Soraya Seedat
{"title":"The therapeutic potential of exercise in post-traumatic stress disorder and its underlying mechanisms: A living systematic review of human and non-human studies.","authors":"Simonne Wright, Virginia Chiocchia, Olufisayo Elugbadebo, Ouma Simple, Toshi A Furukawa, Claire Friedrich, Charlotte Austin, Hossein Dehdarirad, David Gilbert, Jaycee Kennett, Edoardo G Ostinelli, Jennifer Potts, Fiona Ramage, Emily Sena, Spyridon Siafis, Claire Stansfield, James Thomas, Francesca Tinsdeall, Thomy Tonia, Malcolm Macleod, Andrea Cipriani, Georgia Salanti, Soraya Seedat","doi":"10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23033.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Exercise for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a potentially effective adjunct to psychotherapy. However, the biopsychosocial mechanisms of exercise are not well understood. This co-produced living systematic review synthesizes evidence from human and non-human studies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We Included controlled human and non-human studies involving searches of multiple electronic databases (until 31.10.23). Records were screened, extracted, assessed for risk of bias, and reconciled by two independent reviewers. The primary outcome for human studies was PTSD symptom severity, while outcomes of interest for non-human studies included freezing behaviour, fear memory, fear generalization, startle response, and locomotion. Data were synthesised with random-effects meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven human studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall, exercise was not associated with symptom severity improvement compared to control (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.24 to 0.07; 8 studies, one at low risk of bias). High-intensity exercise reduced PTSD symptoms scores more than moderate-intensity exercise. There was insufficient data to examine the effects of exercise on functional impairment, PTSD symptom clusters, and PTSD remission. Only three studies, all at high risk of bias, examined mechanisms of exercise with inconclusive results. Exercise was associated with improvement in all behavioural outcomes, including locomotor activity (SMD 1.30, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.87, 14 studies), and changes in several neurobiological markers, including increase in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (SMD 1.79, 95% CI 0.56 to 3.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While non-human studies provide compelling evidence for the beneficial effects of exercise, human trials do not. Evidence from non-human studies suggest that exercise might increase the levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, enhance cognitive appraisal, and improve perceived exertion. Overall, the paucity of data on the effectiveness of exercise in PTSD and mechanisms of action underscore the need for rigorous trials.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID:453615; 22.08.2023).</p>","PeriodicalId":23677,"journal":{"name":"Wellcome Open Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"720"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11959255/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wellcome Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23033.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Exercise for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a potentially effective adjunct to psychotherapy. However, the biopsychosocial mechanisms of exercise are not well understood. This co-produced living systematic review synthesizes evidence from human and non-human studies.

Methods: We Included controlled human and non-human studies involving searches of multiple electronic databases (until 31.10.23). Records were screened, extracted, assessed for risk of bias, and reconciled by two independent reviewers. The primary outcome for human studies was PTSD symptom severity, while outcomes of interest for non-human studies included freezing behaviour, fear memory, fear generalization, startle response, and locomotion. Data were synthesised with random-effects meta-analysis.

Results: Eleven human studies met the eligibility criteria. Overall, exercise was not associated with symptom severity improvement compared to control (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.24 to 0.07; 8 studies, one at low risk of bias). High-intensity exercise reduced PTSD symptoms scores more than moderate-intensity exercise. There was insufficient data to examine the effects of exercise on functional impairment, PTSD symptom clusters, and PTSD remission. Only three studies, all at high risk of bias, examined mechanisms of exercise with inconclusive results. Exercise was associated with improvement in all behavioural outcomes, including locomotor activity (SMD 1.30, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.87, 14 studies), and changes in several neurobiological markers, including increase in brain-derived neurotrophic factor (SMD 1.79, 95% CI 0.56 to 3.01).

Conclusions: While non-human studies provide compelling evidence for the beneficial effects of exercise, human trials do not. Evidence from non-human studies suggest that exercise might increase the levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor, enhance cognitive appraisal, and improve perceived exertion. Overall, the paucity of data on the effectiveness of exercise in PTSD and mechanisms of action underscore the need for rigorous trials.

Registration: The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (ID:453615; 22.08.2023).

运动对创伤后应激障碍的治疗潜力及其潜在机制:对人类和非人类研究的系统回顾。
背景:运动治疗创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)是一种潜在有效的心理治疗辅助手段。然而,运动的生物心理社会机制尚未得到很好的理解。这篇共同制作的生活系统综述综合了来自人类和非人类研究的证据。方法:我们纳入了涉及多个电子数据库检索的对照人类和非人类研究(截止到23年10月31日)。对记录进行筛选、提取、评估偏倚风险,并由两名独立审稿人进行核对。人类研究的主要结果是PTSD症状严重程度,而非人类研究的主要结果包括冻结行为、恐惧记忆、恐惧泛化、惊吓反应和运动。数据采用随机效应荟萃分析综合。结果:11项人体研究符合入选标准。总体而言,与对照组相比,运动与症状严重程度改善无关(标准化平均差[SMD] -0.08, 95%可信区间[CI] -0.24至0.07;8项研究,1项低偏倚风险)。高强度运动比中等强度运动更能降低PTSD症状得分。没有足够的数据来检验运动对功能损伤、PTSD症状群和PTSD缓解的影响。只有三项具有高偏倚风险的研究考察了运动的机制,但结果不确定。运动与所有行为结果的改善相关,包括运动活动(SMD 1.30, 95% CI 0.74至1.87,14项研究),以及一些神经生物学标志物的改变,包括脑源性神经营养因子的增加(SMD 1.79, 95% CI 0.56至3.01)。结论:虽然非人体研究为运动的有益效果提供了令人信服的证据,但人体试验却没有。来自非人类研究的证据表明,运动可能会增加脑源性神经营养因子的水平,增强认知评估,并改善感知运动。总的来说,缺乏关于运动对创伤后应激障碍的有效性和作用机制的数据强调了严格试验的必要性。注册:协议在PROSPERO注册(ID:453615;22.08.2023)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wellcome Open Research
Wellcome Open Research Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: Wellcome Open Research publishes scholarly articles reporting any basic scientific, translational and clinical research that has been funded (or co-funded) by Wellcome. Each publication must have at least one author who has been, or still is, a recipient of a Wellcome grant. Articles must be original (not duplications). All research, including clinical trials, systematic reviews, software tools, method articles, and many others, is welcome and will be published irrespective of the perceived level of interest or novelty; confirmatory and negative results, as well as null studies are all suitable. See the full list of article types here. All articles are published using a fully transparent, author-driven model: the authors are solely responsible for the content of their article. Invited peer review takes place openly after publication, and the authors play a crucial role in ensuring that the article is peer-reviewed by independent experts in a timely manner. Articles that pass peer review will be indexed in PubMed and elsewhere. Wellcome Open Research is an Open Research platform: all articles are published open access; the publishing and peer-review processes are fully transparent; and authors are asked to include detailed descriptions of methods and to provide full and easy access to source data underlying the results to improve reproducibility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信