Dana AlTarrah, Lulwa Al-Abdullah, Mohammed Alhusayan, Dulce Canha, Sulaiman Almazeedi, Ahmad Al-Serri, Maryam Abulhasan, Talia Alsomly, Naif Almutawa, Mohammed Al-Onaizi, Guy Fagherazzi, Fawaz Alzaid
{"title":"Cross-sectional analysis of eating disorder risk and risk correlates in candidates for bariatric surgery from the BariPredict cohort.","authors":"Dana AlTarrah, Lulwa Al-Abdullah, Mohammed Alhusayan, Dulce Canha, Sulaiman Almazeedi, Ahmad Al-Serri, Maryam Abulhasan, Talia Alsomly, Naif Almutawa, Mohammed Al-Onaizi, Guy Fagherazzi, Fawaz Alzaid","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-95614-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bariatric surgery is an effective intervention for managing obesity. Persons with obesity are a high-risk population for eating disorders (ED), and these can negatively impact perioperative and long-term outcomes of surgery. We aim to understand prevalence and correlates of ED in preintervention patients, identifying those needing psychological support. Baseline cross-sectional analysis of 275 patients of the BariPredict cohort (NCT06480058), a study to assess predictors of long-term surgery outcomes. Psychological assessments were conducted using SCOFF, KUAS, and BDI tools. Data were analyzed for prevalence of high ED risk and for associations of clinical, biological and demographic factors. Mean age was 38.5 years, mean BMI was 42.3 kg/m², with 62.5% being female. 65.8% of patients had a SCOFF score ≥ 2 indicating high ED risk. Class II obesity (p < 0.05), younger age (p < 0.01), and higher depression (p < 0.01) were associated with ED risk in a logistic regression adjusted for age, obesity class, diabetes, HbA1c, depression and anxiety scores. We report high preintervention prevalence of ED, with a risk profile corresponding to BMI of 35-39.9 Kg/m<sup>2</sup> in younger adults with concurrent depression. This patient profile should be prioritized for psychological assessment and support to potentially improve outcomes of bariatric surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"11191"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95614-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Bariatric surgery is an effective intervention for managing obesity. Persons with obesity are a high-risk population for eating disorders (ED), and these can negatively impact perioperative and long-term outcomes of surgery. We aim to understand prevalence and correlates of ED in preintervention patients, identifying those needing psychological support. Baseline cross-sectional analysis of 275 patients of the BariPredict cohort (NCT06480058), a study to assess predictors of long-term surgery outcomes. Psychological assessments were conducted using SCOFF, KUAS, and BDI tools. Data were analyzed for prevalence of high ED risk and for associations of clinical, biological and demographic factors. Mean age was 38.5 years, mean BMI was 42.3 kg/m², with 62.5% being female. 65.8% of patients had a SCOFF score ≥ 2 indicating high ED risk. Class II obesity (p < 0.05), younger age (p < 0.01), and higher depression (p < 0.01) were associated with ED risk in a logistic regression adjusted for age, obesity class, diabetes, HbA1c, depression and anxiety scores. We report high preintervention prevalence of ED, with a risk profile corresponding to BMI of 35-39.9 Kg/m2 in younger adults with concurrent depression. This patient profile should be prioritized for psychological assessment and support to potentially improve outcomes of bariatric surgery.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.