When Should Surgical Human Subject Research Involve Patients Who Are Incarcerated?

Q2 Social Sciences
Lubna Khan, Marcus Hoffman
{"title":"When Should Surgical Human Subject Research Involve Patients Who Are Incarcerated?","authors":"Lubna Khan, Marcus Hoffman","doi":"10.1001/amajethics.2025.283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical research involving patients who are incarcerated is fraught with ethical, logistical, and practical questions. This article first considers important moments in the history of research with people who are incarcerated and suggests how they have contributed to evolution in human subject research ethics and regulation. This article also examines the problem of limited data about surgical disease burden and describes barriers to enrolling individuals who are incarcerated in surgical clinical trials, including study exclusion criteria and clinician-investigator bias. Finally, this article recommends strategies for balancing human research subject protections with the need for equitable enrollment in surgical clinical trials, especially later-phase trials in which benefit is more likely than in early-phase trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":38034,"journal":{"name":"AMA journal of ethics","volume":"27 4","pages":"E283-290"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMA journal of ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/amajethics.2025.283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Surgical research involving patients who are incarcerated is fraught with ethical, logistical, and practical questions. This article first considers important moments in the history of research with people who are incarcerated and suggests how they have contributed to evolution in human subject research ethics and regulation. This article also examines the problem of limited data about surgical disease burden and describes barriers to enrolling individuals who are incarcerated in surgical clinical trials, including study exclusion criteria and clinician-investigator bias. Finally, this article recommends strategies for balancing human research subject protections with the need for equitable enrollment in surgical clinical trials, especially later-phase trials in which benefit is more likely than in early-phase trials.

什么时候外科人体受试者研究应该涉及被监禁的患者?
涉及被监禁病人的外科研究充满了伦理、后勤和实际问题。这篇文章首先考虑了研究历史上与被监禁的人有关的重要时刻,并提出了他们如何为人类受试者研究伦理和监管的进化做出贡献。本文还探讨了关于外科疾病负担数据有限的问题,并描述了招募被监禁在外科临床试验中的个体的障碍,包括研究排除标准和临床医生-研究者偏见。最后,本文推荐了平衡人体研究受试者保护与外科临床试验公平入组需求的策略,特别是后期试验,其中获益比早期试验更有可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
AMA journal of ethics
AMA journal of ethics Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
期刊介绍: The AMA Journal of Ethics exists to help medical students, physicians and all health care professionals navigate ethical decisions in service to patients and society. The journal publishes cases and expert commentary, medical education articles, policy discussions, peer-reviewed articles for journal-based and audio CME, visuals, and more. Since its inception as an editorially-independent journal, we promote ethics inquiry as a public good.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信