Anti-Adalimumab Antibodies in Patients with Noninfectious Uveitis Who Use Adalimumab Weekly or Every Other Week.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Leman Ismayilova, Hilal Eser-Ozturk, Asuman Birinci, Yuksel Sullu
{"title":"Anti-Adalimumab Antibodies in Patients with Noninfectious Uveitis Who Use Adalimumab Weekly or Every Other Week.","authors":"Leman Ismayilova, Hilal Eser-Ozturk, Asuman Birinci, Yuksel Sullu","doi":"10.1080/09273948.2025.2487164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Adalimumab (ADA) is the only biologic agent approved for treating non-infectious uveitis (NIU). Anti-drug antibodies (AAA) may be an essential factor associated with treatment failure. We conducted a study to determine the clinical response to ADA treatment in patients with NIU. We also aimed to determine AAA's frequency and clinical importance in these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 60 NIU patients who used ADA therapy every other week or weekly for at least three months. The clinical findings recorded before starting ADA and on the day included in the study were compared. Serum AAA formation was evaluated. AAA-positive and AAA-negative patients were compared in terms of etiology, duration, and localization of uveitis, duration of ADA treatment, and additional IMT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The increase in visual acuity, decrease in central macular thickness, improvement in the number of attacks/year, and decrease in need for CS were statistically significant with ADA treatment. AAA was positive in 15 (25%) patients. The improvement in median visual acuity, CMT, and number of attacks/year was statistically significant in both ADA-positive and negative patients. The effect of disease etiology, disease duration, uveitis localization, ADA treatment duration, and additional IMT use on serum AAA formation could not be demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ADA is mostly associated with favorable clinical response in treating NIU. In insufficient clinical response, the dose escalation method may increase treatment success. AAA formation may not be the only factor in the ineffectiveness of treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19406,"journal":{"name":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocular Immunology and Inflammation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09273948.2025.2487164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Adalimumab (ADA) is the only biologic agent approved for treating non-infectious uveitis (NIU). Anti-drug antibodies (AAA) may be an essential factor associated with treatment failure. We conducted a study to determine the clinical response to ADA treatment in patients with NIU. We also aimed to determine AAA's frequency and clinical importance in these patients.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 60 NIU patients who used ADA therapy every other week or weekly for at least three months. The clinical findings recorded before starting ADA and on the day included in the study were compared. Serum AAA formation was evaluated. AAA-positive and AAA-negative patients were compared in terms of etiology, duration, and localization of uveitis, duration of ADA treatment, and additional IMT.

Results: The increase in visual acuity, decrease in central macular thickness, improvement in the number of attacks/year, and decrease in need for CS were statistically significant with ADA treatment. AAA was positive in 15 (25%) patients. The improvement in median visual acuity, CMT, and number of attacks/year was statistically significant in both ADA-positive and negative patients. The effect of disease etiology, disease duration, uveitis localization, ADA treatment duration, and additional IMT use on serum AAA formation could not be demonstrated.

Conclusion: ADA is mostly associated with favorable clinical response in treating NIU. In insufficient clinical response, the dose escalation method may increase treatment success. AAA formation may not be the only factor in the ineffectiveness of treatment.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
15.20%
发文量
285
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ocular Immunology & Inflammation ranks 18 out of 59 in the Ophthalmology Category.Ocular Immunology and Inflammation is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and vision scientists. Published bimonthly, the journal provides an international medium for basic and clinical research reports on the ocular inflammatory response and its control by the immune system. The journal publishes original research papers, case reports, reviews, letters to the editor, meeting abstracts, and invited editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信