Speech and language therapy plus electroacupuncture or non-invasive brain stimulation for post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lanlan Zhang, Bingbing Lin, Yunshi Huang, Mengxue Wang, Jinglei Ni, Jian Song, Jia Huang
{"title":"Speech and language therapy plus electroacupuncture or non-invasive brain stimulation for post-stroke aphasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Lanlan Zhang, Bingbing Lin, Yunshi Huang, Mengxue Wang, Jinglei Ni, Jian Song, Jia Huang","doi":"10.1177/10538135241312600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe combination of speech and language therapy (SLT) with acupuncture, electroacupuncture, and non-invasive brain stimulation is commonly used in clinical practice and scientific research for post-stroke aphasia (PSA).ObjectiveThis study assesses the therapeutic effectiveness of SLT-based combination therapies in improving language function in patients with PSA.MethodsPubMed, CBM, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang Data and Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP) were searched through 2 December, 2024. This study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the influence of SLT-based combination treatments and controls on language function in patients with PSA. The meta-analysis was conducted using random effects NMA.ResultsA total of 66 studies were included. The NMA assessing the effectiveness of various interventions for improving speech, repetition, and listening comprehension skills following SLT revealed that combined therapies generally outperformed SLT alone. For speaking skills, SLT + Electroacupuncture demonstrated the highest likelihood of improvement (SUCRA = 84.6). For repetition scores, SLT + Electroacupuncture was effective (SUCRA = 92.0). In listening comprehension, SLT + tDCS showed the greatest potential for improvement (SUCRA = 89.8).ConclusionsThe results revealed that any type of SLT-based combination intervention was more effective than SLT alone. <b>PROSPERO registration number:</b> CRD42022343595.</p>","PeriodicalId":19717,"journal":{"name":"NeuroRehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538135241312600"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroRehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538135241312600","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe combination of speech and language therapy (SLT) with acupuncture, electroacupuncture, and non-invasive brain stimulation is commonly used in clinical practice and scientific research for post-stroke aphasia (PSA).ObjectiveThis study assesses the therapeutic effectiveness of SLT-based combination therapies in improving language function in patients with PSA.MethodsPubMed, CBM, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wan Fang Data and Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP) were searched through 2 December, 2024. This study included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the influence of SLT-based combination treatments and controls on language function in patients with PSA. The meta-analysis was conducted using random effects NMA.ResultsA total of 66 studies were included. The NMA assessing the effectiveness of various interventions for improving speech, repetition, and listening comprehension skills following SLT revealed that combined therapies generally outperformed SLT alone. For speaking skills, SLT + Electroacupuncture demonstrated the highest likelihood of improvement (SUCRA = 84.6). For repetition scores, SLT + Electroacupuncture was effective (SUCRA = 92.0). In listening comprehension, SLT + tDCS showed the greatest potential for improvement (SUCRA = 89.8).ConclusionsThe results revealed that any type of SLT-based combination intervention was more effective than SLT alone. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022343595.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
NeuroRehabilitation
NeuroRehabilitation CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: NeuroRehabilitation, an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal, publishes manuscripts focused on scientifically based, practical information relevant to all aspects of neurologic rehabilitation. We publish unsolicited papers detailing original work/research that covers the full life span and range of neurological disabilities including stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, neuromuscular disease and other neurological disorders. We also publish thematically organized issues that focus on specific clinical disorders, types of therapy and age groups. Proposals for thematic issues and suggestions for issue editors are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信