A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of The Efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Celiac Plexus Blocks for Chronic Pancreatitis Pain.

IF 0.9 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Luke Kar Man Chan, Tanish Rao, Paolo Masangcay, Samuel Chia Lin Kuo, Tai-Tak Wan
{"title":"A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of The Efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Celiac Plexus Blocks for Chronic Pancreatitis Pain.","authors":"Luke Kar Man Chan, Tanish Rao, Paolo Masangcay, Samuel Chia Lin Kuo, Tai-Tak Wan","doi":"10.1080/15360288.2025.2479481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic pancreatitis is a globally prevalent progressive disease, with pain affecting up to 90% of patients, significantly impairing quality of life and leading to high rates of disability, hospitalizations, and opioid dependence. Pain management is crucial in treating chronic pancreatitis, with endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block (EUS-CPB) recognized as an interventional option. This systematic review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines, synthesized data from 12 studies (5 randomized control trials and 7 observational) on the efficacy of EUS-CPB in managing chronic pancreatitis pain. The overall analysis revealed a significant pain relief proportion of 0.64 (n=612) with moderate heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses revealed a proportion of 0.72 in RCTs and 0.59 in observational studies. Common complications included diarrhea and exacerbation of abdominal pain, with no reported mortality. Despite variations in efficacy due to study heterogeneity and patient differences, the findings suggest EUS-CPB as a safe and effective option, with effects lasting weeks to months. Recent studies have demonstrated the applicability of EUS-CPB across ethnically diverse and pediatric populations. However, limitations including small sample sizes and study variability highlight the need for personalized treatment approaches. Future larger randomized sham-controlled trials are recommended to better assess the duration of pain relief and impact on opioid use.</p>","PeriodicalId":16645,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15360288.2025.2479481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic pancreatitis is a globally prevalent progressive disease, with pain affecting up to 90% of patients, significantly impairing quality of life and leading to high rates of disability, hospitalizations, and opioid dependence. Pain management is crucial in treating chronic pancreatitis, with endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block (EUS-CPB) recognized as an interventional option. This systematic review and meta-analysis, following PRISMA guidelines, synthesized data from 12 studies (5 randomized control trials and 7 observational) on the efficacy of EUS-CPB in managing chronic pancreatitis pain. The overall analysis revealed a significant pain relief proportion of 0.64 (n=612) with moderate heterogeneity. Subgroup analyses revealed a proportion of 0.72 in RCTs and 0.59 in observational studies. Common complications included diarrhea and exacerbation of abdominal pain, with no reported mortality. Despite variations in efficacy due to study heterogeneity and patient differences, the findings suggest EUS-CPB as a safe and effective option, with effects lasting weeks to months. Recent studies have demonstrated the applicability of EUS-CPB across ethnically diverse and pediatric populations. However, limitations including small sample sizes and study variability highlight the need for personalized treatment approaches. Future larger randomized sham-controlled trials are recommended to better assess the duration of pain relief and impact on opioid use.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信