Autologous and implant based immediate breast reconstructive trends following unilateral modified radical and radical mastectomy: a SEER database analysis.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Jian H Li, Stephen A Stearns, Angelica Hernandez Alvarez, Samuel J Lin
{"title":"Autologous and implant based immediate breast reconstructive trends following unilateral modified radical and radical mastectomy: a SEER database analysis.","authors":"Jian H Li, Stephen A Stearns, Angelica Hernandez Alvarez, Samuel J Lin","doi":"10.2340/jphs.v60.43198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Longitudinal trends in breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy remain under described. This study aims to assess procedural trends in autologous reconstruction (AR) and implant-based reconstruction (IBR), to analyse demographic shifts in these patients, and to examine differences in oncologic management. This retrospective study utilizes the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to investigate trends in immediate breast reconstruction from 2000 to 2020 following unilateral modified radical and radical mastectomy. Demographic and oncologic variables were collected, and reconstruction types were categorised as IBR, AR, or a combination. Subgroup analyses compared IBR and AR patients, and demographic changes between the 2000-2010 and 2010-2020 cohorts were examined. Chi-square tests in R studio were used for statistical analysis. Of the 25,649 patients, 51.8% underwent IBR and 48.2% AR. AR patients were typically younger, more frequently Black, had higher incomes, and were less likely to live in rural areas compared to IBR patients. A shift from AR to IBR was observed, with AR decreasing from 41.8% in 2000 to 24.5% in 2020. Significant demographic changes in AR patients included increased age, higher proportions of Black and Asian patients, reduced income, and increased non-marital status. Oncologic management differed, as AR patients were less likely to have received chemotherapy and radiation prior to their reconstruction, and experienced longer reconstruction times compared to IBR patients. This study highlights a decline in AR and rising IBR popularity, and reveals evolving patient characteristics. Understanding these trends is crucial for equitable access and informed decision-making in breast cancer reconstructive care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","volume":"60 ","pages":"78-83"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/jphs.v60.43198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Longitudinal trends in breast reconstruction after modified radical mastectomy remain under described. This study aims to assess procedural trends in autologous reconstruction (AR) and implant-based reconstruction (IBR), to analyse demographic shifts in these patients, and to examine differences in oncologic management. This retrospective study utilizes the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to investigate trends in immediate breast reconstruction from 2000 to 2020 following unilateral modified radical and radical mastectomy. Demographic and oncologic variables were collected, and reconstruction types were categorised as IBR, AR, or a combination. Subgroup analyses compared IBR and AR patients, and demographic changes between the 2000-2010 and 2010-2020 cohorts were examined. Chi-square tests in R studio were used for statistical analysis. Of the 25,649 patients, 51.8% underwent IBR and 48.2% AR. AR patients were typically younger, more frequently Black, had higher incomes, and were less likely to live in rural areas compared to IBR patients. A shift from AR to IBR was observed, with AR decreasing from 41.8% in 2000 to 24.5% in 2020. Significant demographic changes in AR patients included increased age, higher proportions of Black and Asian patients, reduced income, and increased non-marital status. Oncologic management differed, as AR patients were less likely to have received chemotherapy and radiation prior to their reconstruction, and experienced longer reconstruction times compared to IBR patients. This study highlights a decline in AR and rising IBR popularity, and reveals evolving patient characteristics. Understanding these trends is crucial for equitable access and informed decision-making in breast cancer reconstructive care.

单侧改良根治性和根治性乳房切除术后自体和植体即刻乳房重建趋势:SEER数据库分析。
改良根治性乳房切除术后乳房重建的纵向趋势仍未得到描述。本研究旨在评估自体重建(AR)和基于植入物的重建(IBR)的手术趋势,分析这些患者的人口统计学变化,并检查肿瘤管理的差异。本回顾性研究利用监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库调查2000年至2020年单侧改良根治性乳房切除术和根治性乳房切除术后立即乳房重建的趋势。收集人口统计学和肿瘤学变量,并将重建类型分类为IBR, AR或组合。亚组分析比较了IBR和AR患者,并检查了2000-2010年和2010-2020年队列之间的人口统计学变化。采用R studio中的卡方检验进行统计分析。在25,649名患者中,51.8%的患者接受了IBR, 48.2%的患者接受了AR。与IBR患者相比,AR患者通常更年轻,更常见的是黑人,收入更高,居住在农村地区的可能性更小。观察到从AR到IBR的转变,AR从2000年的41.8%下降到2020年的24.5%。AR患者的显著人口统计学变化包括年龄增加、黑人和亚裔患者比例增加、收入减少和非婚姻状况增加。肿瘤治疗不同,因为AR患者在重建前接受化疗和放疗的可能性较小,与IBR患者相比,重建时间更长。这项研究强调了AR的下降和IBR的流行,并揭示了不断变化的患者特征。了解这些趋势对于乳腺癌重建治疗的公平获取和知情决策至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of the Journal of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery is to serve as an international forum for plastic surgery, hand surgery and related research. Interest is focused on original articles on basic research and clinical evaluation. The scope of the journal comprises: • Articles concerning operative methods and follow-up studies • Research articles on subjects related to plastic and hand surgery • Articles on cranio-maxillofacial surgery, including cleft lip and palate surgery. Extended issues are published occasionally, dealing with special topics such as microvascular surgery, craniofacial surgery, or burns. Supplements, usually doctoral theses, may also be published. The journal is published for the Acta Chirurgica Scandinavica society and sponsored by the Key Foundation, Sweden. The journal was previously published as Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信